@ARTICLE{Glinicka_Małgorzata_On_2020,
 author={Glinicka, Małgorzata},
 volume={vol. LXXIII},
 number={No 2},
 pages={111-145},
 journal={Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2020},
 publisher={The Polish Academy of Sciences, Division I Humanities and Social Sciences, and The Publishing House ELIPSA / Polska Akademia Nauk, Wydział I Nauk Humanistycznych i Społecznych oraz Dom Wydawniczy ELIPSA},
 abstract={The main concern of the present paper is to determine which types of linguistic descriptions are fit to properly express a complex reality such as developed in Jaina theory of universals and particulars presented in the Jaina Literature of the Classical Period (5th–10th c. CE) in order to demonstrate a way in which the Jaina theory of universals and particulars has an impact upon the way we describe reality through language. I take into consideration the fact that, according to the Jaina philosophy, reality is not describable in the complete way and that there is always – in any linguistic act of picturing the world – the margin of non-cognizance and non-expressiveness. The Jaina philosophy of language offers the original solutions, different from those given by other Indian thinkers, to the abovementioned problems.},
 type={Article},
 title={On how to Speak about Universals and Particulars in the Jaina Philosophical Literature of the Classical Period (5th–10th c. CE)},
 URL={http://ochroma.man.poznan.pl/Content/118025/PDF/ROrient%2073%20z.%202-20%205Glinicka.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/ro.2020.135022},
 keywords={sāmānya, viśeṣa, vastu, artha, pramāṇa, substance, mode},
}