@ARTICLE{Drozdowicz_Zbigniew_On_2020, author={Drozdowicz, Zbigniew}, number={No 4}, journal={Nauka}, pages={75-88}, howpublished={online}, year={2020}, publisher={Biuro Upowszechniania i Promocji Nauki PAN}, abstract={How we speak of and write about stands, or at least it should stand, in relation what we speak of and write. If such a relation does not exist, or it is little visible for the people involved in the written or spoken message there might occur and often they do important doubts by the latter on its intention or even the assumption of bad intention. However, the existence of a clear dissonance between how we speak and write and what we speak of and write about tends many of these people addressed to perceive it as someone who breaks the norms prevailing in such speaking and writing. Those situations took place and still do often when we speak of and write about religion and religiosity without a sort of deliberation that is linked to seriousness and pompousness or even exaltation. In these remarks I do recall examples of such speaking on one side presented by libertines like M. Montaigne and Voltaire, and on the other by theologisans like St. Augustine. M. Luther and J. Tischner.}, type={Artykuły / Articles}, title={On religion and religiosity without deliberation}, URL={http://ochroma.man.poznan.pl/Content/118615/PDF/N%23420-04-Drozdowicz.pdf}, doi={10.24425/nauka.2020.135677}, keywords={libertarian speaking of religion and religiosity, speaking without deliberation of Christian theologians}, }