@ARTICLE{Sauffi_Ahmad_Syauqi_Phase_2022,
 author={Sauffi, Ahmad Syauqi and Ibrahim, Wan Mastura Wan and Al Bakri Abdullah, Mohd Mustafa and Ibrahim, Masdiyana and Ahmad, Romisuhani and Zaidi, Fakhryna Ahmad},
 volume={vol. 67},
 number={No 1},
 journal={Archives of Metallurgy and Materials},
 pages={247-250},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2022},
 publisher={Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science of Polish Academy of Sciences},
 publisher={Committee of Materials Engineering and Metallurgy of Polish Academy of Sciences},
 abstract={Geopolymer is widely studied nowadays in various scope of studies. Some of the ongoing studies are the study of the various materials towards the geopolymer strength produced. Meanwhile, some of the studies focus on the mixing of the geopolymer itself. This paper discussed the phase analysis of metakaolin/dolomite geopolymer for different solid to the liquid ratio which was, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0, and the properties that affected the geopolymer based on the phases. The constant parameters in this study were the percentage of metakaolin and dolomite used. The metakaolin used was 80% meanwhile dolomite usage was 20%. Besides that, the molarity of NaOH used is 10M and the alkaline activator ratio used is 2.0. All the samples were tested at 28 days of curing. The results show that the 0.8 solid to the liquid ratio used gave better properties compare to other solid to liquid ratio. The phases analyzed were quartz, sillimanite, mullite, and faujasite. The 0.8 S/L ratio shows the better properties compared to others by the test of phase analysis, compressive strength morphology analysis, and functional group analysis.},
 type={Article},
 title={Phase Analysis of Different Liquid Ratio on Metakaolin/Dolomite Geopolymer},
 URL={http://ochroma.man.poznan.pl/Content/122535/PDF/AMM-2022-1-32-Mastura%20Wan%20Ibrahim.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/amm.2022.137497},
 keywords={geopolymer, Metakaolin, dolomite, phase analysis},
}