@ARTICLE{Filiani_Pasquale_Macroprudential_2022,
 author={Filiani, Pasquale},
 number={No 2},
 journal={Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics},
 pages={161-198},
 howpublished={online},
 year={2022},
 publisher={Oddział PAN w Łodzi},
 abstract={We consider a monetary DSGE model featuring a borrowing constraint such that the amount of debt cannot be larger than a fraction - the debt-to-income (DTI) limit - of borrowers' labor income and the DTI limit is endogenous. The coexistence of financial amplification mechanisms warranted by this model provides a role for a specific macroprudential tool: a countercyclical DTI limit. Conditional on the pre-crisis sample and in a more recent out-of-sample period, our ex-post normative analysis shows that when this policy is implemented the cooperation between central bank and macroprudential authority in pursuing the “two instruments for two goals” strategy delivers an efficient performance in terms of macroeconomic stabilization, significantly outperforming the central bank's policy of “leaning against the wind”. This implies that a central bank should only be focused on its standard objectives (inflation and output stabilization) while financial stability be monitored by a macroprudential authority.},
 type={Article},
 title={Macroprudential Debt-to-Income Ratio and Monetary Policy Rules},
 URL={http://ochroma.man.poznan.pl/Content/124000/PDF-MASTER/mainFile.pdf},
 doi={10.24425/cejeme.2022.142629},
 keywords={household debt, house prices, loss function, macroprudential policy, monetary policy},
}