Title

Evaluation And Selection Process of Suppliers Through Analytical Framework: An Emprical Evidence of Evaluation Tool

Journal title

Management and Production Engineering Review

Yearbook

2015

Issue

No 3

Authors

Shpend Imeri ; Khuram Shahzad ; Josu Takala ; Yang Liu ; Sillanpää, Ilkka ; Tahir Ali

Keywords

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Divisions of PAS

Wydział IV Nauk Technicznych

Publisher

Production Engineering Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Polish Association for Production Management

Date

2015[2015.01.01 AD - 2015.12.31 AD]

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/mper-2015-0022

Source

Management and Production Engineering Review; 2015; No 3

References

Presutti (2007), The supply chain - finance link Supply Chain, Management Review, 11, 32. ; Snook (1989), Component analysis versus common factor analysis A monte carlo study, Psychological Bulletin, 106, 148, doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.148 ; Groves (2014), Agentassisted supply chain management : Analysis and lessons learned, Decision Support Systems, 57, 274, doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.09.006 ; Loppacher (2011), Key drivers of buyer - supplier relationships in global sourcing strategies of Procurement Management, International Journal, 4, 156. ; Cousins (2006), An empirical taxonomy of purchasing functions, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26, 775, doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672239 ; Dickson (1966), An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions of Purchasing, Journal, 2, 5. ; Droge (2004), The effects of internal versus external integration practices on time - based performance and overall firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 557, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.08.001 ; Choy (2002), Development of a case based intelligent customer - supplier relationship management system Systems with Applications, Expert, 23, 281. ; Nassimbeni (2003), Evaluation of supplier contribution to product development : Fuzzy and neuro - fuzzy based approaches, International Journal of Production Research, 41, 2933, doi.org/10.1080/0020754021000043967 ; Robinson (1991), An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15, 13. ; Missopoulos (2007), Decisive factors for the adoption of just - in - time in greek SMEs A pro - bit model of Logistics Systems and Management, International Journal, 3, 344. ; Takeishi (2001), Bridging inter - and intra - firm boundaries : Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 403, doi.org/10.1002/smj.164 ; Mandal (1994), Vendor selection using interpretive structural modelling ( ISM ), International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14, 52, doi.org/10.1108/01443579410062086 ; Modi (2007), Supplier development : Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer, Journal of Operations Management, 25, 42, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.001 ; Lee (2013), Quality uncertainty and quality - compensation contract for supply chain coordination, European Journal of Operational Research, 228. ; Wynstra (2000), Managing supplier involvement in new product development A portfolio approach of Purchasing & Supply Management, European Journal, 6, 49. ; Nunnally (2010), Psychometric theory ed Tata McGraw, Hill Education, 3. ; Heikkilä (2002), From supply to demand chain management : Efficiency and customer satisfaction, Journal of Operations Management, 20, 747, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00038-4 ; Song (2008), Supplier s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures, Journal of Operations Management, 26, 1, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.001 ; Chen (2004), Strategic purchasing supply management and firm performance, Journal of Operations Management, 22, 505, doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2004.06.002 ; Gong (2008), An economic evaluation model of supply chain flexibility, European Journal of Operational Research, 184. ; Heizer (2008), Operations management Education India, Pearson. ; Fahy (2002), A resource - based analysis of sustainable competitive advantage in a global environment, International Business Review, 11, 57, doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00047-6 ; Cho (2012), A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62, 801, doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014 ; Lamming (1996), Beyond vendor assessment : Relationship assessment programmes of Purchasing & Supply Management, European Journal, 2, 173. ; Weber (1996), A data envelopment analysis approach to measuring vendor performance Supply Chain : An, Management International Journal, 1. ; Szamosi (2002), Development of a measure to assess organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 184, doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423107 ; Fredriksson (2003), The evaluation of supplier performance A case study of volvo cars and its module suppliers of Customer Behavior, Journal, 2, 365. ; Araz (2007), Supplier evaluation and management system for strategic sourcing based on a new multicriteria sorting procedure, International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 585, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.008 ; Dou (2013), Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey - analytical network process - based methodology, European Journal of Operational Research, 233. ; Weber (1991), Vendor selection criteria and methods a, European Journal of Operational Research, 50, 2, doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90033-R ; Cebi (2003), An integrated approach for supplier selection, Logistics Information Management, 16, 395, doi.org/10.1108/09576050310503376 ; Droge (2012), Does supply chain integration mediate the relationships between product / process strategy and service performance ? an empirical study, International Journal of Production Economics, 137. ; Forker (2001), An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21, 195, doi.org/10.1108/01443570110358530 ; Uzzi (1997), Social structure and competition in interfirm networks : The paradox of embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 35, doi.org/10.2307/2393808 ; Caridi (2012), Linking product modularity and innovativeness to supply chain management in the Italian furniture industry, International Journal of Production Economics, 136. ; Tracey (2001), Empirical analysis of supplier selection and involvement customer satisfaction and firm performance Supply Chain : An, Management International Journal, 6, 174. ; Fawcett (2008), Benefits barriers and bridges to effective supply chain management Supply Chain : An, Management International Journal, 13, 35. ; Stadtler (2005), Supply chain management and advanced planning - basics overview and challenges, European Journal of Operational Research, 163. ; Gunasekaran (2004), A framework for supply chain performance measurement, International Journal of Production Economics, 87, 333, doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.08.003 ; Panayides (2009), The impact of trust on innovativeness and supply chain performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 122. ; Krause (2001), Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing, Journal of Operations Management, 19, 497, doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00047-X ; Jaber (2010), Coordinating a three - level supply chain with learning - based continuous improvement, International Journal of Production Economics, 127. ; Hammami (2014), A scenariobased stochastic model for supplier selection in global context with multiple buyers currency fluctuation uncertainties and price discounts, European Journal of Operational Research, 233. ; Inemek (2013), The impact of buyer - supplier relationships on supplier innovativeness : An empirical study in cross - border supply networks, Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 580, doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.10.011 ; Ulaga (2006), Value - based differentiation in business relationships : Gaining and sustaining key supplier status, Journal of Marketing, 70, 119, doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.119 ; Saraph (1989), An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management, Decision Sciences, 20, 810, doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x ; Das (2011), Integrating effective flexibility measures into a strategic supply chain planning model, European Journal of Operational Research, 211. ; Aksoy (2011), Supplier selection and performance evaluation in just - in - time production environments Systems with Applications, Expert, 38, 6351. ; Pi (2006), Supplier evaluation and selection via taguchi loss functions and an AHP, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 27, 625, doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2227-z ; Ho (2010), Multi - criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection A literature review, European Journal of Operational Research, 202. ; Shin (2009), Quantifying suppliers product quality and delivery performance A sourcing policy decision model, Computers & Operations Research, 36, 2462, doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.10.005 ; Qi (2009), Indirect adaptive controller based on a self - structuring fuzzy system for nonlinear modeling and control, Int J Appl Math Comput, 19, 619. ; Churchill (1984), Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales A metaanalysis, Journal of Marketing Research, 21, 360, doi.org/10.2307/3151463

Aims and scope

MISSION STATEMENT Management and Production Engineering Review (MPER) is a peer-refereed, international, multidisciplinary journal covering a broad spectrum of topics in production engineering and management. Production engineering is a currently developing stream of science encompassing planning, design, implementation and management of production and logistic systems. Orientation towards human resources factor differentiates production engineering from other technical disciplines. The journal aims to advance the theoretical and applied knowledge of this rapidly evolving field, with a special focus on production management, organisation of production processes, manage- ment of production knowledge, computer integrated management of production flow, enterprise effectiveness, maintainability and sustainable manufacturing, productivity and organisation, forecasting, modelling and simu- lation, decision making systems, project management, innovation management and technology transfer, quality engineering and safety at work, supply chain optimization and logistics. Management and Production Engineering Review is published under the auspices of the Polish Academy of Sciences Committee on Production Engineering and Polish Association for Production Management. The main purpose of Management and Production Engineering Review is to publish the results of cutting- edge research advancing the concepts, theories and implementation of novel solutions in modern manufacturing. Papers presenting original research results related to production engineering and management education are also welcomed. We welcome original papers written in English. The Journal also publishes technical briefs, discussions of previously published papers, book reviews, and editorials. Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are highly encouraged.
SUBMISSION Papers for submission should be prepared according to the Authors Instructions available at: www.journals.pan.pl/mper
SUBSCRIPTION Only subscription guarantees receiving this journal. Subscription orders stating the period of time, along with the subscriber’s name and address should be sent directly to biuro@ptzp.org.pl. Back issues of all previously published volumes are available on request. Subscription price for 2023, Volume 14, including postage and handling, is 240 PLN.

Abstracting & Indexing

Index Copernicus
Web of Science - Clarivate (ESCI)
Scopus - Elsevier
SCIMAGO:
(CiteScore 2020 - 2.5
SJR 2020 - 0.332
SNIP 2020 - 1.061)