Tytuł artykułu

Effects of Speech Intensity on the Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT) and Modified Rhyme Test (MRT) Presented in Noise

Tytuł czasopisma

Archives of Acoustics

Rocznik

2012

Wolumin

vol. 37

Numer

No 2

Autorzy

Blue-Terry, Misty ; McBride, Maranda ; Letowski, Tomasz

Słowa kluczowe

speech intelligibility ; speech intensity ; speech-to-noise ratio

Wydział PAN

Nauki Techniczne

Zakres

199-203

Wydawca

Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Committee on Acoustics

Data

2012

Typ

Artykuły / Articles

Identyfikator

DOI: 10.2478/v10168-012-0026-3 ; ISSN 0137-5075 ; eISSN 2300-262X

Źródło

Archives of Acoustics; 2012; vol. 37; No 2; 199-203

Referencje

Blue M. (2004), Speech intelligibility of the callsign acquisition test in a quiet environment, International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 10, 179, doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2004.11076606 ; Blue M. (2010), Speech intelligibility measured with shortened versions of callsign acquisition test (CAT) lists, Applied Ergonomics, 41, 291, doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.07.011 ; Fairbanks G. (1958), Test of phonemic difference: The rhyme test, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 596, doi.org/10.1121/1.1909702 ; House A. (1965), Articulation testing methods: Consonantal differentiation with a closed-response set, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 37, 158, doi.org/10.1121/1.1909295 ; Howes D. (1957), On the relation between intelligibility and frequency of occurrence of English words, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 296, doi.org/10.1121/1.1908862 ; Letowski T., Karsh R., Vause N., Shilling R., Ballas J., Brungart D., McKinley R. (2001), <i>Human factors military lexicon: Auditory displays</i>, ARL Technical Report (ARL-TR-2526), U. S. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Grounds, MD. ; Morton J. (1969), Interaction of information in word recognition, Psychological Review, 76, 165, doi.org/10.1037/h0027366 ; Nickerson J. F., Miller A. W. Jr., Shyne N. A. (1960), <i>A comparison of five articulation tests</i>, U. S. Air Force Research and Development Command, Report No. RADC-TR-60-71, Griffiss AFB (NY): U. S. Air Force. ; Rao M. (2003), Speech intelligibility of the call sign acquisition test (CAT) for army communication systems, null. ; Rao M. (2006), Callsign acquisition test (CAT): Speech intelligibility in noise, Ear and Hearing, 27, 120, doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000202289.32228.f6 ; Schultz M. (1964), Word familiarity influences in speech discrimination, Journal of Speech Hearing Research, 7, 395. ; Studebaker G. (1985), A "rationalized" arcsine transform, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 455. ; Studebaker G. (1999), Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105, 2431, doi.org/10.1121/1.426848 ; Williams C. (1968), Relation between intelligibility scores on four test methods and three types of speech distortion, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1002, doi.org/10.1121/1.1911189 ; Zera J. (2004), Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure, Speech Communication, 42, 313, doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2003.08.007