Title

Entropy generation and thermodynamic analysis of solar air heaters with artificial roughness on absorber plate

Journal title

Archives of Thermodynamics

Yearbook

2017

Issue

No 3

Authors

Prasad, Radha K. ; Sahu, Mukesh K.

Keywords

entropy generation analysis ; entropy generation number ; irreversibility ; Bejan number

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Coverage

23-48

Publisher

The Committee of Thermodynamics and Combustion of the Polish Academy of Sciences and The Institute of Fluid-Flow Machinery Polish Academy of Sciences

Date

2017

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

DOI: 10.1515/aoter-2017-0014

Source

Archives of Thermodynamics; 2017; No 3; 23-48

References

OmidM (2014), generation during water nanofluid flow in a solar collector : Effects of tube roughness nanoparticle size and different thermophysical models, Entropy Int J Heat Mass Tran, 16, 64. ; RosenM (1991), Second law analysis approaches implications, Int J Energy Res, 23, 415. ; SainiS (2008), of correlations for Nusselt number and friction factor for solar air heater with roughened duct having arc - shaped wire as artificial roughness Sol, Development Energy, 26, 1118. ; ZimaW (2010), modelling of heat transfer in liquid flat - plate solar collector tubes Arch, Mathematical, 29, 45. ; BejanA (1996), Generation Minimization New York, Entropy. ; IncroperaF (2006), Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer th New York, Edn, 25. ; TingK (2006), KoT generation and optimal analysis for laminar forced convection in curved rectangular ducts numerical study, Entropy Int J Therm Sci, 13, 138. ; MinaS (2011), generation due to natural convection cooling of a nanofluid, Entropy Int Commun Heat Mass, 15, 972. ; PrasadR (1991), Thermal Performance Characteristics of Unidirectional Flow Porous Bed Collectors for Heating Air Ph thesis Institute of Technology, Solar Energy. ; SukhatmeS (2011), rd New Delhi, Solar Energy Edn. ; SciacovelliA (null), generation analysis as a design tool a, Entropy review Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 22, 2015. ; SahinA (1998), Irreversibilities in various duct geometries with constant wall heat flux and laminar flow, null, 23, 465. ; BehuraA (2016), Heat transfer friction factor and thermal performance of three sides artificially roughened solar air heaters, Solar Energy, 20, 130. ; HaydarKucuk (2010), Numerical analysis of entropy generation in concentric curved annular ducts, Mech Sci Technol, 14, 1927. ; BejanA (1981), Second law analysis and synthesis of solar collector systems Sol -, Energ ASME, 24, 103. ; KumarA (2013), of correlations for Nusselt number and friction factor for solar air heater with roughened duct having multi v - shaped with gap rib as artificial roughness, Development Renew Energ, 21, 151. ; MalhotraA (1981), Heat loss calculation of flat plate solar collectors, Therm, 27, 59. ; PrasadR (1992), Packed - bed solar air heater with unidirectional flow arrangement In on in Buildings The Institute of Engineers, Proc Energy Conversion, 29. ; RybińskiW (2014), Analytical solutions of heat transfer for laminar flow in rectangular channels, Arch, 28, 4. ; DagtekinI (2005), An analysis of entropy generation through a circular duct with different shaped longitudinal fins for laminar flow, Int J Heat Mass Tran, 12, 1. ; DuffieJ (1991), Solar of Thermal Processes nd New York, Engineering Edn. ; SahuM (2016), based performance evaluation of solar air heater with arc shaped wire roughened absorber plate, Renew Energ, 233. ; BejanA (1988), Thermodynamics, Advanced Engineering. ; NaphonP (2005), On the performance and entropy generation of the double - pass solar air heater with longitudinal fins, Renew Energ, 19, 1345. ; LayekA (2007), Second law optimization of a solar air heater having chamfered rib groove roughness on absorber plate, Renew Energ, 18, 1967.

Editorial Board

International Advisory Board

J. Bataille, Ecole Central de Lyon, Ecully, France

A. Bejan, Duke University, Durham, USA

W. Blasiak, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

G. P. Celata, ENEA, Rome, Italy

L.M. Cheng, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

M. Colaco, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

J. M. Delhaye, CEA, Grenoble, France

M. Giot, Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium

K. Hooman, University of Queensland, Australia

D. Jackson, University of Manchester, UK

D.F. Li, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China

K. Kuwagi, Okayama University of Science, Japan

J. P. Meyer, University of Pretoria, South Africa

S. Michaelides, Texas Christian University, Fort Worth Texas, USA

M. Moran, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA

W. Muschik, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

I. Müller, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany

H. Nakayama, Japanese Atomic Energy Agency, Japan

S. Nizetic, University of Split, Croatia

H. Orlande, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

M. Podowski, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, USA

A. Rusanov, Institute for Mechanical Engineering Problems NAS, Kharkiv, Ukraine

M. R. von Spakovsky, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA

A. Vallati, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

H.R. Yang, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China