Details
Title
Investment challenges pertaining to the achievement of the goals of the Mobility Policy based on the analysis of the results of traffic surveys in WroclawJournal title
Archives of Civil EngineeringYearbook
2021Volume
vol. 67Issue
No 3Affiliation
Kruszyna, Maciej : Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego 27, 50-370 Wrocław, PolandAuthors
Keywords
mobility policy ; sustainability ; modal split ; traffic survey ; investmentsDivisions of PAS
Nauki TechniczneCoverage
505-523Publisher
WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING and COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCESBibliography
[1] Adkins A., Makarewicz C., Scanze M., Ingram M., Luhr G., “Contextualizing Walkability: Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?”, Journal of the American Planning Association Volume 83 (2017) Issue 3, pp. 296–314.
[2] Banister D. “The sustainable mobility paradigm” Transport Policy 15 (2008), pp. 73–80.
[3] Beirão G., Cabral J., “Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study” Transport Policy 14 (2007): pp. 478–489.
[4] Cass N., Faulconbridge J. “Commuting practices: New insights into modal shift from theories of social practice “ Transport Policy 45 (2016), pp. 1–14.
[5] Cervero R., Denman S., Jin Y., “Network design, built and natural environments, and bicycle commuting: Evidence from British cities and towns”, Transport Policy 74 (2019), pp. 153–164.
[6] Comprehensive Traffic Analysis in Wrocław and Its Vicinity [Kompleksowe Badania Ruchu we Wrocławiu i otoczeniu], KBR 2018 http://bip.um.wroc.pl/artykul/565/37499/kompleksowe-badania-ruchu-we-wroclawiu-i-otoczeniu-kbr-2018
[7] Dingil A.E., Schweizer J., Rupi F., Stasiskiene Z. “Transport indicator analysis and comparison of 151 urban areas, based on open source data” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 10 (2018), pp. 58–66.
[8] Fontoura W.B., Chaves G. de L.D., Ribeiro G.M., “The Brazilian urban mobility policy: The impact in São Paulo transport system using system dynamics”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 51–61.
[9] Goodman A., Jones A., Roberts H., Steinach R., Greny J. “ ‘We Can All Just Get on a Bus and Go’: Rethinking Independent Mobility in the Context of the Universal Provision of Free Bus Travel to Young Londoners” Mobilities, 2014 Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 275–293.
[10] Gori S., Nigro M., Petreli M., “The impact of land use characteristics for sustainable mobility: the case study of Rome” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. (2012) 4: pp. 153–166.
[11] Haddad E.A., Lozano-Gracia N., Germani E., Vieira R.S., Nakamura S., Skoufias E., Alves B.B., “Mobility in cities: Distributional impact analysis of transportation improvements in Săo Paulo Metropolitan Region”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 125–142.
[12] Hymel K., “If you build it, they will drive: Measuring induced demand for vehicle travel in urban areas”, Transport Policy 76 (2019), pp. 57–66.
[13] Kruszyna M., Śleszyński P., Rychlewski J., “Dependencies between Demographic Urbanization and the Agglomeration Road Traffic Volumes: Evidence from Poland”, Land 10 (2021), pp. 47–69.
[14] Liu Y., Wang S., Xiea B., “Evaluating the effects of public transport fare policy change together with built and non-built environment features on ridership: The case in South East Queensland, Australia”, Transport Policy 76 (2019), pp. 78–89.
[15] Metz D., “Valuing transport investments based on travel time saving: Inconsistency with United Kingdom policy objectives”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 21 (2017), pp. 716–721.
[16] Mobility Policy of the City of Wrocław, Attachment to the Resolution of Wrocław City Council No XLVIII/1169/12, 19.09.2013, http://bip.um.wroc.pl/uploads/files/WPM_2013_ENGLISH.pdf
[17] Næss P. “Urban form and travel behavior: Experience from a Nordic context” The Journal of Transport and Land Use 5 (2012) no. 2, pp. 21–45.
[18] Phun V.K., Kato H., Chalermpong S., “Paratransit as a connective mode for mass transit systems in Asian developing cities: Case of Bangkok in the era of ride-hailing services”, Transport Policy 75 (2019), pp. 27–35
[19] Schneider R.J., “Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation”, Transport Policy 25 (2013), pp. 128–137.
[20] Sperry B. R., Dye T., „Impact of new passenger rail stations on ridership demand and passenger characteristics: Hiawatha service case study”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 8 (2020), pp. 1158–1169.
[21] Tang S., Lo H.K., “The impact of public transport policy on the viability and sustainability of mass railway transit – The Hong Kong experience”, Transportation Research Part A 42 (2008), pp. 563–576.
[22] Tight M. et al. “Visions for a walking and cycling focussed urban transport system” Journal of Transport Geography 19 (2011), pp. 1580–1589.
[23] Tyrinopoulos Y., Antoniou C., “Factors affecting modal choice in urban mobility” Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. (2013) 5: pp. 27–39.
[24] Williams D. G., Chatterton T., Parkhurst G., Spotswood F., “An assessment of Voluntary Travel Behaviour Change delivery in England as an alternative to highway construction”, Case Studies on Transport Policy 19 (2019), pp. 318–329.
[25] Yan X., Levine J., Marans R., “The effectiveness of parking policies to reduce parking demand pressure and car use”, Transport Policy 73 (2019), pp. 41–50.
[26] Zhang, W., Guhathakurta, S., Khalil, E.B., 2018. The impact of private autonomous vehicles on vehicle ownership and unoccupied VMT generation. Transport. Res. C Emerg. Technol. 90, pp. 156–165.
[27] Zhao X., Chen P., Jiao J., Chen X., Bischak C., “How does ‘park and ride’ perform? An evaluation using longitudinal data”, Transport Policy 74 (2019), pp. 15–23.
[28] Zhou, J., Schweitzer, L., 2011. Getting drivers to switch: transit price and service quality among commuters. Journal of Urban Planning and Development 137, pp. 477–483.
[29] Zhou J., “Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students”, Transportation Research Part A 46 (2012), pp. 1013–1029.