Title

The assessment of the social performance of residential buildings

Journal title

Archives of Civil Engineering

Yearbook

2021

Volume

vol. 67

Issue

No 3

Affiliation

Radziejowska, Aleksandra : AGH University of Science and Technology in Cracow, Department of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering and Geotechnics, Av. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Cracow, Poland

Authors

Radziejowska, Aleksandra

Keywords

residential buildings ; building’s sustainability ; method of assessment ; mathematical model ; the social quality index

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Techniczne

Coverage

543-564

Publisher

WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING and COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL ENGINEERING POLISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

Bibliography

[1] EN 15643-3, Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of buildings – Part 3: Framework for the assessment of social performance, 2012.
[2] EN 16309, Sustainability of construction works – Assessment of social performance of buildings – Calculation methodology, 2014.
[3] A. U.S. Environmental Protection, https://www.epa.gov/, 26.01.2018. [Online].
[4] C. o. t. E. Communities, “Action Plan for sustainable construction,” A Lead market Initiative for Europe, Bruksela, 2007.
[5] H. Daly, “Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development,” 1996.
[6] s. EN 15643-1, Sustainability of construction works - Sustainability assessment of buildings – Part 1: General framework, 2011.
[7] H. Zabihi, F. Habib and L. Mirsaeedie, “Sustainability in Building and Construction: Revising Definitions and Concepts,” International Journal of Emerging Sciences, 2(4), pp. 570–578, December 2012.
[8] M. Bryx, Fundamentals of Real Estate Management, Warsaw: poltext, 2009.
[9] J. Arendalski, Durability and reliability of residential buildings, Warsaw: Arkady, 1978.
[10] P. Knyziak, “Analysis of the Technical State for Large-Panel Residential Buildings Using Artificial Neural Networks,” Wydawnictwo Politechniki Warszawskiej, January 2007.
[11] M. R. M. K. J. Miks L., “Assessment of the technical condition of older urban buildings as a base for reconstruction proposals,” Slovak, pp. 30–34, 03 2004.
[12] A. M. A. S. Langevine R., “Decision support tool for the maintenance management of buildings,,” Joint International Conference on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering, Montreal–Canada, 14–16 June 2006.
[13] K. Firek and J. Dębowski, “Influence of the mining effects on the technical state of the panel housing,” Technical Transactions. Architecture, pp. 275–280, 2007.
[14] A. Wodyński, Technical wear of buildings in mining areas, Cracow: Uczelniane Wydaw. Nauk.-Dydakt. AGH im. S. Staszica, 2007.
[15] M. Wójtowicz, “Durability of buildings in the light of Regulation No. 305/2011,” Building Materials, pp. 28–29, December 2012.
[16] J. Konior, “Technical Assessment of Old Buildings by Fuzzy Approach,” Archives of Civil Engineering 65(1), pp. 130–141, March 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ace-2019-0009
[17] D. Caccavelli and G. H., “TOBUS – an European diagnosis and decision making tool for Office building upgrading Energy and Building,” 2002. [Online]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7788(01)00100-1
[18] B. Nowogońska and J. Cibis, “Technical problems of residential construction,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245 (5), pp. 52–42, October 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/5/052042
[19] A. Kaklauskas, E. Zavadskas and S. Raslanas, “Mulivariant design and multiple criteria analysis of building refurbishemnt,” Energy and Buildings, pp. 361–372, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.07.005
[20] T. Kasprowicz, “Identification analysis of the exploitation of building objects,” in Polish construction a year after joining the European Union. Selected technological and organizational problems, Gdańsk, 2005.
[21] Z. Orłowski and A. Radziejowska, “Model for assessing the utility properties of a building,” in Conference: People, Buildings And Environment, Kromeriz, 2014.
[22] A. Ostańska, “Revitalization programs of settlements with prefabricated buildings in Europe, a contribution to the development of Polish programs”, Przegląd budowlany, 3, 2010.
[23] BREEAM, https://www.breeam.com/, Building Research Establishment, 31.01.2018. [Online].
[24] CASBEE, http://www.ibec.or.jp/CASBEE/english/ Japan Sustainable Building Consortium, 31 01 2018. [Online].
[25] DGNB, http://www.dgnb.de/en/, German Sustainable Building Council, 31.01.2018. [Online].
[26] G. B. C. LEED, https://new.usgbc.org/leed, 31.01.2018. [Online].
[27] N. Ardda, R. Mateus and L. Bragança, “Methodology to Identify and Prioritise the Social Aspects to Be Considered in the Design of More Sustainable Residential Buildings – Application to a Developing Country,” Buildings, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/buildings8100130
[28] E. Radziszewska-Zielina, P. Czerski, Ł. Grześkowiak and K.-S. P. , “Comfort of use assessment in buildings with Interior wall insulation based on silicate and lime system in the context of the elimination of mould growth,” Archives of Civil Engineering, pp. 89–104, 2020. https://doi.org/10.24425/ace.2020.131798
[29] p. 6. Dz. U. Nr 75, Regulation of the Minister of Infrastructure regarding technical conditions that should be met by buildings and their location, 2002.
[30] Z. Orłowski and A. Radziejowska, “Model for assessing „accessibility” - the basic category in the evaluation of social performance of buildings according to standards PN-EN 16309+A1:2014-12,” Technical Transactions, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4467/2353737XCT.17.134.6885

Date

2021.09.08

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/ace.2021.138070