Title

Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to susceptibility to misinformation

Journal title

Polish Psychological Bulletin

Yearbook

2022

Volume

vol. 53

Issue

No 2

Affiliation

Sadowski, Szymon Kamil : Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland ; Szpitalak, Malwina : Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

Authors

Sadowski, Szymon Kamil ; Szpitalak, Malwina

Keywords

high sensitivity ; sensory processing sensitivity ; personality trait ; misinformation effect ; suggestibility ; eyewitness testimony

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

79-87

Publisher

Committee for Psychological Science PAS

Bibliography

Ahadi, B., Basharpoor, S. (2010). Relationship Between Sensory Processing Sensitivity, Personality Dimensions and Mental Health. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 570–574.
Aron, A., Ketay, S., Hedden, T., Aron, E. N., Markus, H. R., Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2010). Temperament trait of sensory processing sensitivity moderates cultural differences in neural response. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 219–226.
Aron, E. N. (2017). Wysoko wrażliwi. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Feeria.
Aron, E. N. (2018). Wysoko wrażliwe dziecko. Sopot: GWP.
Aron, E. N. (2020). Clinical assessment of sensory processing sensitivity. In The Highly Sensitive Brain (pp. 135-164). Academic Press.
Aron, E., Aron, A. (1997). Sensory-Processing Sensitivity and Its Relation to Introversion and Emotionality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 345-368.
Aron, E., Aron, A. (2018). Tips For SPS Research (Revised July 24, 2018).
Aron, E., Aron, A., Jagiellowicz, J. (2012). Sensory Processing Sensitivity: A Review in the Light of the Evolution of Biological Responsivity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(3), 262- 282.
Benham, G. (2006). The highly sensitive person: Stress and physical symptom reports. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1433–1440.
Blank, H., Launay, C. (2014). How to protect eyewitness memory against the misinformation effect: A meta-analysis of post-warning studies. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(2), 77-88.
Bruck, M., Melnyk, L. (2004). Individual differences in children’s suggestibility: A review and synthesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 947-996.
Brydges, C. R., Gignac, G. E., Ecker, U. K. (2018). Working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, and the continued influence effect: A latent-variable analysis. Intelligence, 69, 117-122.
Chyliński, M. (2018). Fałszywe wiadomości: antydobra w ekosystemie informacji. Com. press, 4(1), 6-22.
Craik, F. I. M., Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
Czechow, A. (1983). Trzy siostry. Warszawa: Iskry.
Gerstenberg, F. (2012). Sensory-processing sensitivity predicts perfor-mance on a visual search task followed by an increase in perceived stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 496–500.
Greven, C. U., Lionetti, F., Booth, C., Aron, E., Fox, E., Schendan, H. E., ... Homberg, J. (2019). Sensory Processing Sensitivity in the context of Environmental Sensitivity: A critical review and development of research agenda. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 98, 287-305.
Gudjonsson G. H. (1983). Suggestibility, intelligence, memory recall and personality: An experimental study. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 35–37.
Gudjonsson, G. H. (1993). The Psychology of Interrogations, Confessions and Testimony. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Harris, L. S., Goodman, G. S., Augusti, E. M., Chae, Y., Alley, D. (2009). Children's resistance to suggestion. W: K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (red.), The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations (181–202). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Hoscheidt, S. M., LaBar, K. S., Ryan, L., Jacobs, W. J., Nadel, L. (2014). Encoding negative events under stress: High subjective arousal is related to accurate emotional memory despite misinformation exposure. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 112, 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2013.09.008
Kantor-Martynuska, J. (2012). The princess and the pea. Suggestions for the revision of sensory sensitivity in the regulative theory of temperament. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(4), 237-247.
Liebman, J. I., McKinley-Pace, M. J., Leonard, A. M., Sheesley, L. A., Gallant, C. L., Renkey, M. E., Lehman, E. B. (2002). Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of adults' eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(1), 49-66.
Lindberg, M. (1991). An interactive approach to assessing the suggestibility and testimony of eyewitnesses. W: J. Doris (red.), The suggestibility of children’s recollections (47-59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Lionetti, F., Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Burns, G. L., Jagiellowicz, J., Pluess, M. (2018). Dandelions, tulips and orchids: evidence for the existence of low-sensitive, medium-sensitive and high-sensitive individuals. Translational Psychiatry, 8(24), 1-11.
Lionetti, F., Pastore, M., Moscardino, U., Nocentini, A., Pluess, K., & Pluess, M. (2019). Sensory processing sensitivity and its association with personality traits and affect: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 81, 138-152.
Liss, M., Timmel, L., Baxley, K., Killingworth, P. (2005). Sensory processing sensitivity and its relation to parental bonding, anxiety and depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1429– 1439.
Listou Grimen, H., & Diseth, Å. (2016). Sensory processing sensitivity: Factors of the highly sensitive person scale and their relationships to personality and subjective health complaints. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 123(3), 637-653.
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press.
Loftus, E. F. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30- year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & memory, 12(4), 361-366.
Loftus, E. F., Miller, D. G., Burns, H. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 19–31.
Lovecky, D. (1986). Can You Hear the Flowers Sing? Issues for Gifted Adults. Journal of Counseling and Development, 64, 572–575.
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Nitschke, J. P., Chu, S., Pruessner, J. C., Bartz, J. A., Sheldon, S. (2019). Post-learning stress reduces the misinformation effect: Effects of psychosocial stress on memory updating. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 102, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.008
Pluess, M., Assary, E., Lionetti, F., Lester, K. J., Krapohl, E., Aron, E. N., Aron, A. (2018). Environmental sensitivity in children: Development of the Highly Sensitive Child Scale and identification of sensitivity groups. Developmental Psychology, 54(1), 51-70.
Pluess, M., Belsky, J. (2013). Vantage sensitivity: individual differences in response to positive experiences. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 901–916.
Polczyk, R. (2007). Mechanizmy efektu dezinformacji w kontekście zeznań świadka naocznego. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
Porter, S., Birt, A. R., Yuille, J. C., Lehman, D. (2000). Negotiating of false memories: Interviewer and remember characteristics relate to memory distortion. Psychological Science, 11, 513–516.
Rosnow, R. L., Rosenthal, R. (1989). Definition and interpretation of interaction effects. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 143–146.
Sand, I. (2016). Wrażliwość: dar czy przekleństwo?. Warszawa: Laurum.
Siuta, J. (2006). Inwentarz osobowości NEO-PI-R. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych.
Smolewska, K. A., McCabe, S. B., Woody, E. Z. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of the Highly Sensitive Person Scale: The components of sensory-processing sensitivity and their relation to the BIS/BAS and “Big Five”. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1269- 1279.
Sobocko, K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2015). Trait sensory-processing sensitivity and subjective well-being: Distinctive associations for different aspects of sensitivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 44-49.
Strelau, J., Zawadzki, B. (1993). The Formal Characteristics of Behaviour – Temperament Inventory (FCB-TI): theoretical assumptions and scale construction. European Journal of Personality, 7, 313-336.
Szpitalak, M., Dukała, K., Polczyk, R. (2013). Rola wzmocnionej autoafirmacji i wzmocnionego niepowodzenia w redukowaniu efektu dezinformacji. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 16, 235-248.
Szpitalak, M., Polczyk, R. (2017). Efekt dezinformacji z perspektywy psychologii społecznej: natura i uodparnianie. Psychologia Społeczna, 121(40), 30-41.
Vogel, S., Schwabe, L. (2016). Learning and memory under stress: implications for the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 1, 16011.
Way, B. M., Taylor, S. E. (2010). The serotonin transporter promoter polymorphism is associated with cortisol response to psychosocial stress. Biological psychiatry, 67(5), 487-492.
Wiel, N. M. H. van de, Goozen, S. H. M. van, Matthys, W., Snoek, H., Engeland, H. van. (2004). Cortisol and treatment effect in children with disruptive behavior disorders: a preliminary study. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(8), 1011-1018.
Wojciechowski, B. W. (2015). Psychologiczne uwarunkowania i ocena wartości dowodowej zeznań świadków. Warszawa: Difin.
Wolf, M., Van Doorn, S., Weissing, F. J. (2008). Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. PNAS, 105(41), 15825.
Zawadzki B., Strelau J. (1997). Formalna Charakterystyka Zachowania – Kwestionariusz Temperamentu (FCZ-KT). Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego. Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., Li, H., Xue, G., Lu, Z., Dong, Q. (2010a). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Cognitive factors. Memory, 18(5), 543–555. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2010.487051
Zhu, B., Chen, C., Loftus, E. F., Lin, C., He, Q., Chen, C., Li, H., Moyzis, R. K., Lessard, J., Dong, Q. (2010b). Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 889–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.016

Date

2022.06.08

Type

Article

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/ppb.2022.141135

Aims and scope

Polish Psychological Bulletin (founded in 1970) is an official journal of Polish Academy of Sciences, Committee for Psychological Science.The journal publish a variety of papers, including empirical reports of experiments, surveys and field studies, theoretical articles, controversies and analytic papers on important psychological topics. Relevance for an international readership is our prominent goal, Polish Psychological Bulletin does not publish clinical case studies, or technical articles. Submissions from all domains of psychology are encouraged, especially those that address new developments and pursue innovative approaches.

Periodically, the journal will announce a call for papers for special issues. The journal will also entertain unsolicited proposals for special issues that fit the stated scope of the Polish Psychiological Bulletin (please contact the journal’s Editor-in-Chief with a detailed description of your proposal).

All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous evaluation of content and merit by independent expert reviewers.

For information on specific requirements, please see the Author Guidelines.

Abstracting & Indexing

Abstracting and Indexing Information


• DESY Publication Database

• Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

• Current Contents: Social & Behavioral Sciences

• Dimensions

• EBSCO

• ERIH Plus

• Google Scholar

• Index Copernicus

• ProQuest

• PsychArchives

• Science Open

• SCOPUS (Elsevier)

• Sherpa/RoMEO