Details

PDF BIBTEX RIS

Title

Para w pustym gnieździe – o turbulencjach relacyjnych po wyprowadzce dorosłych dzieci z domu rodzinnego

Journal title

Studia Socjologiczne

Yearbook

2024

Issue

No 3

Affiliation

Zadkowska, Magdalena : Uniwersytet Gdański

Authors

Zadkowska, Magdalena

Keywords

puste gniazdo ; sociologia pary ; Model Turbulencji Relacyjnych

Divisions of PAS

Nauki Humanistyczne i Społeczne

Coverage

31-58

Publisher

Instytut Filozofii i Socjologii PAN ; Komitet Socjologii PAN ; Wydział Socjologii UW

Bibliography

  1. Aeby, G., Gauthier, J-A. (2021). The Contribution of the Life-Course Perspective to the Study of Family Relationships: Advances, Challenges, and Limitations. W: A.M. Castrén, V. Cesnuityte, I. Crespi, J. A. Gauthier, R. Gouveia, C. Martin, A. Moreno Mínguez, K. Suwada (red.), The Palgrave Handbook of Family Sociology in Europe (s. 557-574), Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Anderson, S. A., Russell, C. S., Schumm, W. R. (1983). Perceived marital quality and family life-cycle categories: A further analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 127–139.
  3. Barszcz, P. (2019). Zjawisko gniazdownictwa w krajach Unii Europejskiej – skala, przyczyny, skutki. Casus Polski. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica, 69, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-600X.69.03
  4. Berger, P., Kellner, H. (1964). Marriage and the Construction of Reality: An Exercise in the Microsociology of Knowledge. Diogenes, 12(46), 1–24.
  5. Bouchard, G. (2014). How Do Parents React When Their Children Leave Home? An Integrative Review. Journal of Adult Development, 21, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-013-9180-8
  6. Bouchard, G., McNair, J. L. (2016). Dyadic Examination of the Influence of Family Relationships on Life Satisfaction at the Empty-Nest Stage. Journal of Adult Development, 23(3), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-016-9233-x
  7. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Gray, D. (2017). Collecting qualitative data: A practical guide to textual, media and virtual techniques. Cambridge University Press.
  8. Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.
  9. Brisini, K. St. C., Taylor, S. H. (2023). The Spillover of Parenting Stress onto Marital Qualities and Communication During Parenting Disagreements: A Relational Turbulence Theory Perspective. Journal of Family Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2023.2264264
  10. Brubaker, T. H. (1985). Later life families. Sage.
  11. Cooney, T. M. (2022). Introduction to Special Issue on „Divorce and the Life Course”. Social Sciences, 11(202), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11050202
  12. Craig, P. L., Truswell, A. S. (1988). Dynamics of food habits of newly married couples: food-related activities and attitudes towards food. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 1, 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-277X.1988.tb00214.x
  13. Crowley, B. J., Hayslip, B. J., Hobdy, J. (2003). Psychological hardiness and adjustment to life events in adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 237–248.
  14. Dennerstein, L., Dudley, E., Guthrie, J. (2002). Empty nest or revolving door: A prospective study of women’s quality of life in midlife during the phase of children leaving and re-entering the home. Psychological Medicine, 32, 545–550.
  15. Dewilde, C. (2003). A life-course perspective on social exclusion and poverty. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 109–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131032000045923
  16. Dowgiałło, B., Giraud, C., Herzberg-Kurasz, M. (2024). Navigating emotional terrain: women’s experiences of loss and gain. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 291–308). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_13
  17. Duvall, E. M. (1971). Family development. Lippincott.
  18. Elder, G. H. (1985). Perspectives on the life course. W: G.H. Elder, Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions (1st edition, s. 23–49). Cornell University Press.
  19. Elder, G. H. Jr. (1995). The Life Course Paradigm: Social Change and Individual Development. W: P. Moen, G. H. Jr. Elder, K. Luscher (red.), Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development (s. 101–139). American Psychological Association.
  20. Erikson, J. J., Martinengo, G., Hill, E. J. (2010). Putting work and family experiences in context: differences by family life stage. Human Relations, 63, 955–979.
  21. Feeney, J., Peterson, C., Noller, P. (1994). Equity and marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. Personal Relationships, 1(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1994.tb00056.x
  22. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying Families. Sociology, 41, 65–81.
  23. Gabb, J. (2008). Researching intimacy in families. Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Gabb, J., Fink. J. (2018). Couple relationships in the 21st century. Palgrave Macmillan.
  25. Gajewska, M., Herzberg-Kurasz, M., Żadkowska, M., Kostecka, M., Dowgiałło, B. (2023). Room of her own: remaking empty nest and creating herspaces in practices of Polish mothers whose children left home. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 30, 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068221110336
  26. Gajewska, M., de Singly, F., Żadkowska, M., Giraud, C., Kostecka, M., David-Goretta, S. (2024). Animals in the empty nest: recomposition of family roles. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 159–177). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_8
  27. Gądecki, J., Jewdokimow, M., Żadkowska, M. (2018). New technologies and family life in the context of work at home. The strategies of work-life balance. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 17, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.7494/human.2018.17.4.77
  28. Giraud, C., Kossakowski, R., Żadkowska, M., Dowgiałło, B. (2024). The empty nest as a phase of fatherhood. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 65–89). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_4
  29. Herzberg-Kurasz, M. (2023). Motherhood in the empty nest – a lack of social recognition? Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje, 62, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.31971/pps/173555
  30. Herzberg-Kurasz, M., Giraud ,Ch., Gajewska, M. (2024). Reconfiguration of the mother’s role after the departure of the children. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 159–177). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_8
  31. Glenn, N. D. (1990). Quantitative Research on Marital Quality in the 1980s: A Critical Review, Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 818–831.
  32. Glenn, N. D. (2003). Distinguishing Age, Period, and Cohort Effects. W: Mortimer, J.T., Shanahan, M. J. (red.), Handbook of the Life Course. Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_21
  33. Gorchoff, S. M., John, O. P, Helson, R. (2008). Contextualizing change in marital satisfaction during middle age: an 18-year longitudinal study. Psychological Science, 19(11), 1194–1200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02222.x
  34. Harper, J. M., Schaalje, B. G., Sandberg, J. G. (2000). Daily hassles, intimacy, and marital quality in later life marriages. American Journal of Family Therapy, 28(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/019261800261770
  35. Heiman, J. R., Long, J. S., Smith, S. N., Fisher, W. A., Sand, M. S., Rosen, R. C. (2011). Sexual Satisfaction and Relationship Happiness in Midlife and Older Couples in Five Countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9703-3
  36. Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N. (2020). Research on marital satisfaction and stability in the 2010s: challenging conventional wisdom. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12635
  37. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1992). La Trame conjugale: analyse du couple par son linge. Editions Nathan.
  38. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1993). Sociologie du coupe, wyd. 4, Presses Universitaires de France.
  39. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1996). L’entretien compréhensif. Editions Nathan.
  40. Kaufmann, J.-C. (1997). Le coeur à l’ouvrage. Theorie de l’action ménagère. Editions Nathan.
  41. Kaufmann, J.-C. (2004). Ego. Socjologia jednostki. (Tłum. K.Wakar). Oficyna Naukowa.
  42. Kemmer, D., Anderson, A. S., Marshall, D.W. (2002). Living Together and Eating Together: Changes in Food Choice and Eating Habits during the Transition from Single to Married/Cohabiting. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00089
  43. Knobloch, L. K., Solomon, D. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278.
  44. Knobloch, L. K., Carpenter-Theune, K. E. (2004). Topic avoidance in developing romantic relationships: Associations with intimacy and relational uncertainty. Communication Research, 31, 173–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650203261516
  45. Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A. (2012). Experiences of U.S. military couples during the post-deployment transition: Applying the relational turbulence model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 423–450.
  46. Koppetsch, C., Burkart, G. (1999). Die Illusion der Emanzipation: zur Wirksamkeit latenter Geschlechtsnormen im Milieuvergleich. UVK.
  47. Kostecka, M., Żadkowska, M., Dowgiałło, B., David-Goretta, S. (2024). Without children at home: transition to herplaces and hisplaces. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 265–289). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_12
  48. Kossakowski, R., Kosakowska-Berezecka, N., David-Goretta, S. (2024). Struggling with limitations, creating new possibilities: perspective of men experiencing the empty nest. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 309–325). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_14
  49. Kreider, R.M. (2005). Number, timing, and duration of marriages and divorces: 2001. Current Population Reports, 70–97. US Census Bureau.
  50. Krzaklewska, E. (2017). W stronę międzypokoleniowej współpracy? – wyprowadzenie się z domu rodzinnego z perspektywy dorosłych dzieci i ich rodziców. Societas/Communitas, 24(2), 159–176.
  51. Kulik, L., Shilo-Levin, S., Liberman, G. (2010). Work family role conflict and well-being among women and men. Career Assessment, 24(4), 651–668.
  52. Kwak, A., Rosochacka-Gmitrzak, M., Bieńko, M. (2017). Wciąż jeszcze w gnieździe rodzinnym? Socjologiczne spojrzenie na młodych dorosłych. Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie.
  53. Lenz, K. (2009). Soziologie der Zweierbeziehung: Eine Einführung. Springer-Verlag.
  54. Liberska, H. (2014). Rozwój rodziny i rozwój w rodzinie. W: I. Janicka, H. Liberska (red.), Psychologia rodziny, (s. 221–240). Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  55. Marshall, D.W., Anderson, A.S. (2002). Proper meals in transition: young married couples on the nature of eating together. Appetite, 39(3), 193–206.
  56. Mitchell, B.A. (2016). Happily ever after? Marital satisfaction during the middle adulthood years. Couple relationships in the middle and later years: their nature, complexity, and role in health and illness. American Psychological Association, 17–36.
  57. Mitchell, B. A., Lovegreen, L. D. (2009). The Empty Nest Syndrome in Midlife Families: A Multimethod Exploration of Parental Gender Differences and Cultural Dynamics. Journal of Family Issues, 30(12), 1651–1670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09339020
  58. Mizielińska, J. (2017). Odmienne czy zwyczajne? Rodziny z wyboru w Polsce. WN PWN.
  59. Mizielińska, J., Stasińska, A., Żadkowska, M., Halawa, M. (2018). Dylematy etyczne w badaniu pary intymnej. Doświadczenia z pracy badawczej. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(230), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.24425/122473
  60. Morgan, D. (2011a). Locating „Family Practices”. Sociological Research Online, 16(4), 1–9.
  61. Morgan, D. (2011b). Rethinking Family Practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
  62. Nagy, M. E., Theiss, J. A. (2013). Applying the Relational Turbulence Model to the Empty-Nest Transition: Sources of Relationship Change, Relational Uncertainty, and Interference from Partners. Journal of Family Communication, 13(4), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2013.823430
  63. Olcoń-Kubicka, M., Halawa, M. (2018). Making a living: how middle-class couples in Warsaw start and practice a household. Kultura i Społeczeństwo, 62(4), 91–111.
  64. Paprzycka, E., Mianowska, E. (2019). Płeć i związki intymne – strukturalne uwarunkowania trwałości pary intymnej. Dyskursy Młodych Andragogów/Adult Education Discourses, 20. https://doi.org/10.34768/dma.vi20.38
  65. Pernau, M. (2014). Space and Emotion: Building to Feel. History Compass, 12(7), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/hic3.12170
  66. Przybył, I. (2017). Historie przedślubne. Przemiany obyczajowości i instytucji zaręczyn. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
  67. Pustułka, P., Sarnowska, J., Buler, M. (2022). Resources and pace of leaving home among young adults in Poland. Journal of Youth Studies, 25(7), 946–962. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1925638
  68. Radina, M. E., Hennon, C. B., Gibbons, H. M. (2008). Divorce and mid- and later life families: A phenomenological analysis with implications for family life educators. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 49, 142–170.
  69. Rancew-Sikora, D., Skowrońska, M. (2022). Adult children move out: family and reflections on parental self-sacrifice at the moment of transition. Sociological Research Online, 28, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804211065050
  70. Rancew-Sikora, D., Żadkowska, M. (2023). The mother of all worries: formulations of parents’ gender in their talk about the transition to the empty nest phase. Journal of Pragmatics, 213, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2023.06.003
  71. Randhawa, M., Kaur, J. (2021). Acknowledging Empty Nest Syndrome: Eastern and Western Perspective. Mind and Society, 10(03-04), 38–42.
  72. Reckwitz, A. (2012). Affective spaces: a praxeological outlook. Rethinking History, 16(2), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2012.681193
  73. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.
  74. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge University Press.
  75. Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., Savigny, E. von. (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Psychology Press.
  76. Schmidt, F. (2016). Materializacja pary: napięcia w procesie budowania domowej codzienności we dwoje. W: M. Łukasiuk, M., Jewdokimow (red.), Socjologia zamieszkiwania: narracje, dyfuzje, interwencje (s. 153–172). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
  77. Schmidt, F., Mizielińska, J., Stasińska, A., Olcoń-Kubicka, M., Żadkowska, M., Jasińska, J., Halawa, M. (2018). W stronę socjologii pary: propozycja paradygmatu teoretyczno-badawczego. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(230), 11–39. https://doi.org/10.24425/122471
  78. Schmidt, F., Skowrońska, M., Żadkowska, M., Giraud, C. (2024). Redefining a couple’s relationship in the empty nest: the new honeymoon. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 181–208). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_9
  79. Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience: The Social Organization of Normality. Berg.
  80. Sikorska, M. (2019). Praktyki rodzinne i rodzicielskie we współczesnej Polsce - rekonstrukcja codzienności. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  81. Singly, de F. (1996). Le soi, le couple et la famille, Essais et recherches. Sociologie du travail, 39 (1), 123–125.
  82. Singly, de F. (2005). Libres ensemble: l’individualisme dans la vie commune. Nathan.
  83. Skowrońska, M., Schmidt, F. (2023). Teorie praktyk a praktyka badawcza: potencjał i ryzyka na przykładzie studiów nad rodziną. Studia Socjologiczne, 251(4), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.148175
  84. Skowrońska, M., Schmidt, F., Giraud, C., Żadkowska, M. (2024). Redefining a couple’s relationship in the empty nest: together apart. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 209–238). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_10
  85. Smart, C. (2007). Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Polity Press.
  86. Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K. (2001). Relationships uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 804–820.
  87. Solomon, D. H., Theiss, J. A. (2008). A longitudinal test of the relational turbulence model of romantic relationship development. Personal Relationships, 15, 339–357.
  88. Solomon, D. H., Weber, K. M., Steuber, K. R. (2010). Turbulence in relational transitions. W: S. W. Smith, S. R. Wilson (red.), New directions in interpersonal communication research (s. 115–134). CA: Sage.
  89. Solomon, D. H., Knobloch, L. K., Theiss, J. A., McLaren, R. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42, 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
  90. Stasińska, A. (2018). Socjologia pary. Praktyki intymne w związkach nieheteroseksualnych. Nomos.
  91. Steuber, K. R., Solomon, D. H. (2008). Relational uncertainty, partner interference, and infertility: A qualitative study of discourse within online forums. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 831–855.
  92. Szlendak, T. (2010). Socjologia rodziny. Ewolucja, historia, zróżnicowanie. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  93. Trost, J. (1993). Family from a Dyadic Perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 14 (1), 92–104.
  94. Weber, K. M., Solomon, D. H. (2008). Locating relationship and communication issues among stressors associated with breast cancer. Health Communication, 23, 548–559.
  95. White, L. K., Edwards, J. N. (1990). Emptying the Nest and Parental Well-Being: An Analysis of National Panel Data. American Sociological Review, 55, 235–242.
  96. Woroniecka, G. (2014). „Ja” czy „my” w przestrzeni? Doświadczenia i klasyfikacje w sytuacjach współzamieszkiwania. W: M. Łukasiuk, M. Jewdokimow (red.), Socjologia zamieszkiwania (s. 37–62). Wydawnictwo Naukowe Sub Lupa.
  97. Żadkowska, M. (2016). Para w praniu: codzienność, partnerstwo, obowiązki domowe. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  98. Żadkowska, M., Giraud, C. (2024). Recoupling transitions in the empty nest: women’s perspective. W: M. Żadkowska, M. Skowrońska, C. Giraud, F. Schmidt (red.), Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay (s. 239–261). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7_11
  99. Żadkowska, M., Herzberg-Kurasz, M. (2022). „Boomeranging covidowy” – o powrotach dorosłych dzieci do domów. Perspektywa rodziców. Przegląd Socjologii Jakościowej, 18, 40–61. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8069.18.1.03
  100. Żadkowska, M., Olcoń-Kubicka, M., Gądecki, J., Mizielińska, J., Stasińska, A., Schmidt, F., Halawa, M. (2018). Metodologiczne aspekty jakościowych badań par – synteza doświadczeń terenowych. Studia Socjologiczne, 3(230), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.24425/122472
  101. Żadkowska, M., Skowrońska, M., Giraud, C., Schmidt, F. (2024). Reconfiguring relations in the empty nest: those who leave and those who stay. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50403-7

Date

2024.09.23

Type

Artykuły / Articles

Identifier

DOI: 10.24425/sts.2024.151933
×