How to search?
advanced search
Humanities and Social Sciences

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne

Description

HISTORYKA. STUDIES IN HISTORICAL METHODS is a journal dedicated to the theory of history, historical methods and history of historiography. The journal is published once a year since 1967.

ISSN
ISSN 0073-277X; e-ISSN 3071-6608
Publishers
Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział PAN w Krakowie, Instytut Historii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
HISTORYKA. STUDIES IN HISTORICAL METHODS is a journal dedicated to the theory of history, historical methods and history of historiography. The journal is published once a year since 1967
Jakub Basista (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Dipesh Chakrabarty (University of Chicago),
Andrzej Chwalba (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Ewa Domańska (Stanford University; Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza),
Maciej Dymkowski (SWPS, Wrocław),
François Hartog (L'École des hautes études en sciences sociales, L'EHESS),
Marta Kurkowska-Budzan (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Allan Megill (University of Virginia), Tomasz Pawelec (Uniwersytet Śląski),
Jan Pomorski (Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej),
Maciej Salamon (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Rafał Stobiecki (Uniwersytet Łódzki),
Jan Skoczyński (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Piotr Sztompka (Uniwersytet Jagielloński),
Veronica Tozzi (Universidad de Buenos Aires),
Wojciech Wrzosek (Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza),
Anna Ziębińska-Witek (Maria Curie Skłodowska University)


EDITORS IN CHIEF

Krzysztof Zamorski (Jagiellonian University) is the editor of "Historyka. Studia Metodologiczne" since 2019. He was its co-editor in 1997-2019.

Zamorski works at the Institute of History at the Jagiellonian University and is head of the Chair of Historical Anthropology and Theory of History. He studied history and sociology at Jagiellonian University. He has held research fellowships at the University of Geneva and the EESH Laboratory of Historical Demography in Paris and the University of Liege. He was a visiting scholar at Columbia University and twice at Rochester University (1999, 2005).

ffAuthor of five books, co-editor of three, author of 170 articles. From 1993 to 2003 he was director of the Jagiellonian Library in Cracow, Poland. Member of the board of directors of the Polish Historical Society, he served as president of the Cracow Branch of the Polish Historical Society in 2013- 2022. He created the series "History of Life" published by the renowned Polish publishing house "Universitas".

His fields of research are: theory of history and history of historiography (recent publ. in English: “The Warsaw Congress: A Historiographic Reflection”, in With a Zest and in a Refined Form..., Krzysztof Makowski, Maciej Michalski, Tomasz Schramm, Karolina Filipowska eds., XXIII International Congress on Historical Sciences, Poznan 2022, 2020-2022); historical demography and social and economic history of modern and recent times (Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. History, Memory, Legacy. Andrzej Chwalba and Krzysztof Zamorski. Eds., Routledge. New York and London, 2020.)

ASSISTANT EDITORS

Jakub Muchowski (Jagiellonian University), Rafał Swakoń (Jagiellonian University)

LANGUAGE CONSULTANTS

Barbara Ratecka, Caroline Stupnicka, Robin Gill

e-mail: historyka@uj.edu.pl

Department of History

Jagiellonian University

Golebia 13

31-007 Krakow

Poland

Historyka is an open access journal with all content available with no charge in full text version. The journal content is available under the licencse CC BY-NC-SA 4.
Historyka is indexed in databases:
Arianta
BazHum
CEJSH
ERIH Plus

Historyka is archived in the repository of the Polish Academy of Sciences and made available on the academy's Journal PAS platform.


  • Volumes
  • Instructions for authors
  • Publication Ethics Policy
  • Peer-review Procedure
  • Reviewers

Select number

Content

Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52

1 Introduction
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 7-8
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex
2 Chemistry of history
Karolina Polasik‑Wrzosek
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 9-28 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142715
Keywords: Wojciech Wrzosek Jerzy Topolski Jerzy Kmita seminar non‑classical historiography
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper is a conversation about Wojciech Wrzosek's biography and academic work. It describes his university education at Adam Mickiewicz University, especially his participation in the seminars of Jerzy Topolski and Jerzy Kmita. The paper goes on to outline the subsequent stages of Wrzosek's academic career, his research travels abroad and the leading of the Interdisciplinary History Seminar, which was intended as a continuation of Topolski's seminar. The paper also discusses Wrzosek's two books – History – Culture – Metaphor and On Historical Thinking – their intellectual genealogy, context of their writing and reception.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karolina Polasik‑Wrzosek
3 Wrzosek's conception of historiographical metaphor
Artur Dobosz
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 29-60 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142716
Keywords: Wojciech Wrzosek Paul Ricoeur (1913–2005) metaphor philosophy of history Annales
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the paper I try to demonstrate that interactive concept of metaphor, in particular, that proposed by Ricoeur – contrary to what Wrzosek preaches – has a very limited use in the study of thought processes leading to the formulation of the metaphors used by the science.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Artur Dobosz
1
  1. Politechnika Poznańska (emeritus)
4 Postwar reality: borders, humans, administration and policy in motion
Tomasz Pudłocki , Kamil Ruszała
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 61-65 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142717
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Pudłocki
1
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Ruszała
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Jagiellonian University
5 Great changes at home: Latvians abroad and the proclamation of the Republic of Latvia in 1918
Kristīne Beķere
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 67-90 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142718
Keywords: Latvia 1918 postimperial transition transformation
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper examines how Latvian communities abroad reacted to and were influenced by a change of the first magnitude in the political life of their homeland, namely, the proclamation of the Republic of Latvia on November 18, 1918. News of the proclamation, first of all, necessitated diaspora Latvians choosing attitudes towards the new phenomenon, which highlighted the political pre‑dispositions of the different groups within the diaspora. Polarisation of opinions was followed shortly by a wave of activities both in support of and against the new Republic. These activities included gathering financial resources for war victims and state institutions in Latvia, public relations campaigns in diaspora host countries, political lobbying etc. The establishment of the Republic of Latvia also profoundly influenced and intensified the internal formation processes within the diaspora. A marked increase of activity is observable in all fields of engagement that are characteristic of an active ethno‑national diaspora: the internal organisational structure was further developed; contacts with the homeland intensified; mutual links between geographically distant diaspora groups became closer. The great political changes in the homeland gave the Latvian diaspora the push necessary to fully develop and become an active ethno‑national diaspora.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kristīne Beķere
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. University of Latvia
6 Between unification and particularism: Pomerania and independence
Tomasz Krzemiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 91-106 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142719
Keywords: Pomerania 1918 postimperial transformation post–WW1 period
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Vistula Pomeranian (the former Prussian province of West Prussia) remained the longest dependent part of the partitioning power of Poland, which was reborn after 1918. In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Polish population of these lands, whose original ethnic component was Kashubians, strengthened their national awareness under the influence of modernisation processes. As in the entire Prussian partition, the dominant factor here was the idea of national solidarity built around an attachment to Catholicism. The defeat of Germany in World War I was associated by the local Poles with the incorporation of Pomeranian lands into the borders of the Polish Republic. The decisions of the Paris Conference of 1919 were awaited with hope and enthusiasm. Independence, however, brought disappointment caused by the economic crisis, as well as the inability of the central authorities to deal with the native population. Against this background, there were conflicts and misunderstandings throughout the entire interwar period. After 1920, the slogans of regional particularism gained popularity among the indigenous Pomeranian population. However, the German threat of the yoke forced local political and social activists to respond to the idea of unification of Pomeranian lands with the rest of the country, pushed by the central authorities.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Krzemiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń
7 “Unwelcome guests”: Situation of Galician refugees in Austro-Hungary at the end of the First World War and at the time of dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy
Kamil Ruszała
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 107-121 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142720
Keywords: refugees wartime migrations repatriations 1918 postimperial space Galicia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper investigates the situation of Galician refugees in the Habsburg Empire during the last year of the First World War. The majority of the refugees returned home following the eastward movement of the frontline in 1915 (i.e. after the Gorlice‑Tarnów campaign). However, many others stayed deep within the Austro‑Hungarian Empire till the end of the war. According to the official reports of the Ministry of the Interior, there were still 90 thousand refugees (25% Poles, 28% Jews, and 46% Ukrainians, then known as Ruthenians) receiving social benefits from the state in the Austrian part of the Empire on 1st September 1918. Moreover, one can add countless refugees who stayed in the interior of the Empire at their own expense. The situation became even more complicated when the feelings of enmity on the part of the local inhabitants escalated. Pressed by society, the local authorities started expelling the refugees. As a consequence, some of them returned home, while others still stayed in exile in search of a better life. What is even more interesting is that some of them (mostly Jews) emphasised the lack of a bond with the new Polish state born in November 1918.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kamil Ruszała
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Jagiellonian University
8 Nationalism, violence, and education: secondary schools in Polish-Ukrainian borderland between 1918 and 1919
Tomasz Pudłocki
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 123-144 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142721
Keywords: nationalism violence secondary education schools Eastern Galicia Lviv Przemyśl Sambir Yavoriv
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this article is to take a closer look at school communities in the Polish‑Ukrainian borderland in the 1918/1919 school year. Their members, particularly the headteachers, previously focused on teaching the students obedience and loyalty towards the emperor in Vienna, had to completely redefine their roles in order to find themselves in the new reality in the late autumn of 1918. Moreover, another year of the turmoil of war, countless teachers and students in the army, enormous economic problems, exacerbated by the fights for dominance on the disputed territory, forced the headteachers to deal with matters as they arose, and the decisions they made did not always work in practice. What cast a shadow over secondary school activity apart from the Polish‑Ukrainian war was also Polish‑Jewish relations.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Tomasz Pudłocki
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Jagiellonian University
9 Question of identity of the aristocratic families in the new national states after 1918: An example of Habsburg & Hochberg families in Poland
Mateusz Drozdowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 145-164 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142722
Keywords: identity questions Habsburg Hofburg aristocracy 1918 postimperial transition
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The independence of newly born (or reborn) states at the end of 1918 raised the question of the future of the aristocratic families who had built their position in the pre‑war empires. An interesting example of such dilemmas arose in Poland. This was connected with the fate of two originally German‑speaking families. One of them was a branch of the imperial Habsburg family that settled in Żywiec (German: Saybush) in western Galicia. The other: rich and powerful family of Hofburg von Pless having their main seat in Pszczyna (German: Pless) in Prussian Upper Silesia. They were both members of the absolute elite of European aristocracy, being related to many noble and royal families and playing important roles in the political and economic life of Austro‑Hungary and Germany. What they also had in common was the fact, that their estates were located in a borderland between different ethnic and national groups. After the end of World War One, almost all these properties became part of the independent Polish state. As a result, the new administration treated the families with serious distrust. However, their national choices were different: the Habsburgs of Żywiec started to consider themselves as pure Polish, while the Hofburgs radically adhered to their German self‑identity. This article shows what the criteria were behind these choices.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mateusz Drozdowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Pedagogical University of Cracow
10 Women, gender, and political imprisonment in the Hungarian Siberia, 1919–1924
Emily Gioielli
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 165-183 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142723
Keywords: Hungary Hungarian Soviet Republic Postwar society gender political imprisonment
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The incarceration of those determined to be security risks was a common feature of the wartime regimes of most European belligerents throughout the Great War. Yet, especially in several of the Habsburg successor states, internment and politicised incarceration continued as the war morphed into smaller wars, revolutions, and counterrevolutions. This paper traces the social history of political incarceration in Hungary between approximately 1914–1924, with special attention to the post‑armistice period, during which wartime emergency laws were extended or revised to deal with political upheaval and renewed regional warfare. Within this framework, the paper focuses on the experience of one woman, a university‑educated teacher, who became a leading leftist educator and was imprisoned for her role in the Hungarian Republic of Councils (also called the Hungarian Soviet Republic) in 1920. She left Hungary for the Soviet Union in the 1920s as part of a prisoner exchange, and she remained there until the end of World War Two. She later returned to Hungary, and in 1953, published a memoir about her experiences during World War One and its aftermath. Using a gendered analysis to move from the larger context to the individual experience helps reveal continuity and change from Hungary’s Great War to its “war after war,” as well as the systematic and improvised nature of carceral deprivation and violence against female political prisoners. It also shows how the gendered memories of the Long World War One inflected the post‑1945 socialist party’s ideological mobilisation of women, putting forward an example of socialist womanhood that simultaneously challenged and reinforced the categories of prisoners and activists.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Emily Gioielli
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts
11 The creation of the state: The fate of old institutions of political power and the creation of new ones in the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes from 1918-1923
Stipica Grgić , Ivan Hrstić
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 185-203 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142724
Keywords: Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes history of institutions development of state administration centralisation
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the first years of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes, the foundations were laid for a political crisis that later marked its entire existence until its collapse at the outset of World War II. One of the basic causes for this situation was the centralist policy implemented by the dominant political actors, despite the complexities and heterogeneity of the new state. This study analyses the direction and tempo with which this centralist system was built from 1918 to 1923, with a focus on the western regions which had been a part of the Austro‑Hungarian Empire until 1918, and whose political representatives most strongly opposed centralisation.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Stipica Grgić
1
ORCID: ORCID
Ivan Hrstić
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Croatian Institute of History
  2. Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar
12 Venezia Giulia and Dalmatia: geography and the relationship with the Slavs at the University of Padua after the First World War
Alessio Conte
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 205-225 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142725
Keywords: Padua university geography irredentism nationalism Italy Istria Dalmatia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The issue of the Italian eastern border after World War I has interested many Italian, Slovenian and Croatian scholars in the field of politics and diplomatic relations. It is known that Italy's diplomatic failure at Versailles in 1919 led to the rise of D'Annunzio's nationalism, which was entirely adopted by Fascism. The question of the Italian eastern border was provisionally resolved in 1920 but its final conclusion came with the Treaty of Rome signed in 1924 concerning the partition of the Free State of Fiume.
During this period several Italian intellectuals contributed to the political debate on borders. Before, during and after the war, the city of Padua was one of the main centres of Italian democratic irredentism. Within its university, some professors influenced students through their lectures and historical‑geographical teaching and set a basis for a new kind of knowledge, in between populism and scientific instances.
With this contribution, the author considers some particular cases that during the First World War and immediately afterwards exposed their positions through their academic teaching. Among these, the liberal‑patriotic Friulian geographers Arrigo Lorenzi and Francesco Musoni, both professors in Padua, affirming that Italy should reach its natural borders along the Alpine ridge as far as the Istrian and, for Musoni, Dalmatian mountains. Noteworthy at a time, when nationalism pitted peoples against each other, they considered Slavic culture as a natural and historical characteristic of north‑eastern Italy: even if they affirmed it had been used by the Germans to annihilate Italian culture, it should not be eliminated but integrated jointly with the creation of friendly relations with the Kingdom of SCS.
Despite their ideas, history would turn out differently. Their example, however, bears witness to the fact that in intellectual circles and in higher education in Italy after the Great War, in particular among geographers, there was a minority aiming at a peace that went beyond nationalism and was based on study and knowledge regarding neighbouring countries.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alessio Conte
1 2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. University of Padua, Ca'Foscari of Venice
  2. University of Verona
13 Government land policies in occupied enemy territory: the case of British rule in Ottoman Palestine, 1917–1920
Martin Bunton
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 227-246 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142726
Keywords: Palestine Occupation policy Ottoman Empire Postimperial administration transition
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the chaotic situation following the British invasion of southern Palestine at the end of 1917, military officials faced several countervailing pressures. In addition to ongoing military priorities (including international norms pertaining to military occupations, such as the law of the ‘status quo’), pressing humanitarian concerns, and even the personal religious sentiments of individual officers, the British occupation administration was forced to take into account international pressures and interventions resulting from the overlapping and conflicting promises made during the war (inter alia, Sykes‑Picot agreement, Husayn‑McMahon correspondence, Balfour Declaration, and President Wilson’s 14 Points). This paper focuses on the land policy‑making process as a case study with which to weigh the various factors pressing upon the military occupation as it evolved during its first three years. Land ownership was a huge concern: a properly functioning land registry was seen as key to the improvement of economic and social conditions in the largely agricultural economy, and British interventions were followed closely by all interested parties. The land has also been at the centre of the ensuing century‑long conflict between Arabs and Jews. Thus, a close examination of land policies (and especially the 1920 land ordinance) offers an extremely important window on both the rule of law in the aftermath of the war and our understanding of the current, unending conflict in the land.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Martin Bunton
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. University of Victoria
14 On the ruins of Ottoman Empires: Edip Adivar’s narration of the War of Independence
Karolina Wanda Olszowska
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 247-259 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142727
Keywords: Halide Edip Adıvar Ateşten Gömlek war of independence Turkish women
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Halide Edip Adıvar was one of the best‑known symbols of the modern, pro‑Western daughters of the Republic of Turkey. Through her own life and work, she exemplified how Turkish women should change. One of her greatest works is “The Daughter of Smyrna” (“Ateşten Gömlek”); its story takes place during the war of independence. Women participated in the fight and they encouraged the fighters, similarly to Ayşe, the character from the novel. They were the symbol of Anatolia and Turkey.
In the article, the context of the war of independence is briefly sketched. Then, the figure of Halide Edip is presented with the special attention paid to the period of her fight by Mustafa Kemal’s side. In the last part, the figures of the women presented in the book are analysed. The important questions asked in the article concern the similarities between the author and the characters created by her and how modern Turkish women living in the Republic of Turkey at the beginning of its existence should have looked.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Karolina Wanda Olszowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Jagiellonian University
15 Historia więcej-niż-ludzka. Filozofia historii w czasach antropocenu
Marek Tamm , Zoltán Boldizsár Simon
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 261-287 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142728
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Tamm
1
ORCID: ORCID
Zoltán Boldizsár Simon
2
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Tallinn University
  2. Bielefeld University
16 Let us honour the memory of our fathers, but let us not take an example from them”. The history of the Second World War and alternative visions of its course in the light of selected works by Polish historical revisionists
Dawid Gralik
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 289-310 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142729
Keywords: alternative history historical narrations historical revisionism Polish campaign of 1939 World War 2
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In recent years, some authors have departed from the classical presentation of World War 2. This article analyses selected alternative and revisionist narratives present in the works of Tymoteusz Pawłowski, Rafał Ziemkiewicz and Piotr Zychowicz in terms of historical and ahistorical thinking, presents the authors' attitude towards the achievements of historiography, and presents the way in which they create their narratives, the content of those narratives, and evaluates them in terms of their correctness from the point of view of compliance with historical facts.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dawid Gralik
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Wydział Historii
17 Economic crises in the Polish countryside in the 17th and 18th centuries and the demands of rescue history. The example of the Krzeczów starosty
Patryk Kuc
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 311-325 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142730
Keywords: rescue history farm and serf economy rural communities economic crisis war damage
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Research on the economy of the Polish‑Lithuanian Commonwealth usually follows one of two paths: searching for the genesis of the crisis of the farm and serf economy or estimating the scale of war damage. Is it possible to join these two paths and present a complex model of the functioning of local communities during the crisis? Can it be used in the field of the rescue history?
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Patryk Kuc
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Jagielloński
18 The role of counterfactual thinhing in the transformation of Eastern Roman religiosity towards the series of catastrophes of the Justinian age
Marta Helena Nowak
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 327-348 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142731
Keywords: Counterfactual thinking Justinian's plague conceptual blending iconolatry the cult of Virgin Mary
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In the sixth century, a series of natural disasters struck the Eastern Roman Empire, the most serious of which was the plague that raged from 541 to 542. The contemporary consensus is that Justinian's reign brought a fundamental cultural transformation and, according to Misha Meier's (2016) research, the plague marked a significant caesura in the transition from late antiquity to the Byzantine Middle Ages. The article is based on the assumption that the catastrophic events were a trigger for the transformation of the therapeutic piety, the development of which was conditioned by the ability to project the unreal. The purpose of the paper was to analyse counterfactual projections in rituals created as a response to the disasters besetting in the age of the Emperor Justinian. The author proposes to treat these religious formulas as visualised forms of counterfactual thinking based on the integration of cause and effect, according to the theory of conceptual blending. The article concludes that in case of the 6th century, counterfactual thinking enabled the transformation and development of early mediaeval culture and may have reduced the stress associated with the catastrophic events that affected the society of the Byzantine Empire.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marta Helena Nowak
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
19 The desirable heaviness of being. Solidarity’s nostalgia for heavy modernity in the times of crisis, 1980–81.
Piotr Perkowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 349-370 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142732
Keywords: heavy modernity nostalgia late state socialism Eastern Europe Solidarity movement
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Late, unlike heavy, modernity until now has been devoid of any radical project for the future. It rather makes people use a rose‑tinted past to cope with future‑oriented anxieties. Solidarity’s desire for heavy modernity demonstrates that this sickness has been around for a long time. In what ways were the people of Solidarity nostalgic, and how did modernity’s global crisis reinvigorate the “desirable heaviness of being”? “The desirable heaviness of being” depicts the phenomenon of nostalgia for postwar heavy modernity within the early Solidarity movement. The theory of post‑socialist nostalgia highlights the importance of nostalgia for the future‑oriented past of heavy modernity in appraising the system during the Solidarity period. The interplay between Solidarity, late state socialism, and the crisis of heavy modernity exemplifies Eastern Europe’s interactions with globalising economies before and after 1989. The recollections of the August Strike as well as the Solidarity trade union’s programme provide examples for the longing. The links between state socialism and the global crisis of modernity shed light on current reasons for nostalgia, which may be of interest to “rescue history”.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Piotr Perkowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Gdański
20 Historiographic drugs for national catastrophes. About the work on the codex diplomaticus Silesiae before and after 1945
Oleksandr Pestrykov
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 371-386 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142733
Keywords: edition and publication of historical sources Silesia diplomatics catastrophe pharmakon
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to answer the question: can the process of historical source construction be a way of responding to national catastrophe?
The primary meaning of the word catastrophe is the unexpected but logical conclusion of a play. Although the word "catastrophe" has changed its meaning, it still retains its connotation. It is not a meaningless ending. History cannot be the cure for catastrophe in the classical sense. Its effects are well described by the idea of Pharmakon, which we can find in Plato. Pharmakon is both a medicine and a poison. A person suffering a catastrophe is not cured, but rather is inebriated by history. It is what gives one the strength to survive the trauma of catastrophe. Historians are no exception.
The second half of the article is a concrete example (case‑study) of how, under the guise of objective studies of historical documents, historians create realities that help them to relive (but not cure) the trauma of catastrophe. Often the historical source is perceived as an immutable, natural basis for the construction of a historical narrative. A historical source has no nationality, but it can obtain it. The most popular and simple way is the publication of new (or first) historical sources edition as "nationals" This article examines a specific example of the race between Polish and German historians (after 1945) on the issue of publishing historical sources concerning mediaeval Silesian history. Since the very same documents had to be published, the primacy in publication of new editions had to determine its "nationality".
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oleksandr Pestrykov
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
21 Ethnogenetic storytelling and the workshop of the 16th century historian
Krystyna Szelągowska
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 387-408 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142734
Keywords: Marcin Kromer Umbra Saxonis origo gentis Renaissance historiography historical craft
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main topic of this paper focuses on the interdependencies between the 16th century historian’s craft and the legendary origo gentis. Two specific examples would be analysed: Marcin Kromer’s Sarmatian origine of the Poles and Nicolaus Petreius’s Cimbrian origine of the Danes. The general presentation of non‑political and non‑ideological presumptions for accepting the mythical past known from the medieval texts delivers the background on which it can be grasped, how Early Modern historians treated that tradition. The analysis of the working methods would be also preceeded by showing the variety of approaches observed in terms of the topic: when dealing with the ethogenetic theories, the historians decided to use polemical oration/treatise as the main form. Another form: the legendary history was applied for presenting the past “before” and “after” the process of shaping the nation/state. The scholarly methods used by both historians included both tradition and novelty: ethymological deductions, endorsment of the classical authorities (and obviously, the Bible), forgery, but at the same time impressive erudition and attempts to addopt some historical criticism.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Krystyna Szelągowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
22 Clio feels: the reflection on international history on the example of the issue of emotions
Przemysław Piotr Damski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 409-434 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142735
Keywords: international history emotions methodology universal history diplomatic history history of international relations craft of historian
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents the issue of researching emotions in international history. It has been noticed that the development of the research on emotions within other sub‑disciplines of history, humanities, social sciences and neuroscience, provides an international historian with many outcomes enabling further research opportunities. At the same time, it was indicated that the tools traditionally used by historians (i.e., internal and external critique of the sources, and the intuitive approach) may be useful in conducting such research. A historian who decides to deal with the problem of emotions, is, however, forced to pay special attention to the context in which the people whose lives he examines functioned. Therefore, the research on emotions, also in the international context, requires greater awareness of the achievements of other academic disciplines from the historian. This task is difficult and perhaps demands from the historian that they be more sensitive and intuitive than in case of other studies. Nevertheless, by approaching the issue of emotions, international historians have a chance to obtain a more credible image of the past.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Przemysław Piotr Damski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Akademia Finansów i Biznesu Vistula
23 Police of the Second Republic of Poland – between negation and glorification. Historiography and research postulates. Part 1 – The state of research until 1989
Robert Litwiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 435-452 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142736
Keywords: Polish historiography 1919–1989 Modern history State Police Police of the Silesian Voivodeship the Second Republic of Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article is part one of a discussion that attempts to examine the state of research on the history of the police in the Second Republic of Poland as presented in to‑date historiography. My interest includes literature concerning both the State Police and the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship, two organisations independent from each other. The 1989/1990 timeline is obviously not accidental, as it was of great significance for the way research on public security organs in the interwar period was conducted.
The recent 100‑year anniversary of the National Police created an excellent opportunity to assess the achievements pertaining to its history and the organisation modelled on it, i.e., the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship (PWŚl). Although their history has been the subject of several studies, it is worth taking a closer look at them trying to assess both the problems addressed and the quality of these studies. The author has made an attempt to carry out a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the existing literature, which is to lead to the identification of significant accomplishments, as well as to highlighting unexplored possibilities.
The author has chosen scientific publications as a basis for his analyses. Publications of an occupational nature, that is, manuals, specialist materials, handbooks, course books, etc., remain outside the area of the author’s interest.
The resulting analysis leads to the conclusion that it was not until the late 1980s that the one‑sided image of the pre‑war police, constructed through the discourse of repression against the “progressive” communist and workers’ movements, began to be abandoned. However, still dominating was the factual history, unfortunately not preceded by theoretical reflections.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Litwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
24 Police of the Second Republic of Poland – between negation and glorification. Historiography and research postulates. Part 2 – The state of research since 1990
Robert Litwiński
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 453-506 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142737
Keywords: Polish historiography since 1990 Modern history State Police Police of the Silesian Voivodeship the Second Republic of Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present article is part two of the discussion attempting to assess the state of research on the history of the police in the Second Republic of Poland in historiography. This time I focus on the publications since 1990. I am interested in the literature concerning both the State Police and the Police of the Silesian Voivodeship, two independent organisations. The subsequent part deals with works published since 1990, and the last part is focused on the fate of police officers after September 1, 1939. This section also contains more complete summaries and research postulates. Obviously, the 1989/1990 timeline is not accidental, as it had a significant impact on the way historiography dealing with public security organs in the interwar period was conducted. The turn of the 1980s and 1990s was extremely fruitful for Polish historiography, including research on the history of the pre‑war police. On the one hand, access to archival materials became free and easy, thus opening new perspectives for researchers. This unrestricted possibility of using documents from the family archives of police officers and their family members was of great importance for gaining information about the everyday service of police officers. On the other hand, in some publications we notice a prevailing tendency to over‑heroise and sometimes even mythologise the pre‑war police, and this unfortunately is still happening today. All this coincided with the fact that there were an increasing number of authors dealing with the history of the police in the Second Republic, and consequently, the scope of research I was interested in had to expand.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Robert Litwiński
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
25 One or multiple comparative methods? The comparatism in Polish mediaeval studies
Rafał Rutkowski
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 507-529 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142738
Keywords: comparative method analogy methodology of history Polish historiography Georges Dumézil
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is an attempt to look at the mediaevalist work of Jacek Banaszkiewicz through the prism of statements of other scholars using the comparative method (including M. Handelsman, M. Małowist, M. Tymowski, K. Modzelewski). The aim is to answer the question of whether there is a set of guidelines that every comparatist should follow. The specific issues discussed here include the role of difference and similarity in comparison, the notions of function, analogy and homology, geographical and chronological limitations of comparative studies, and the role of influence and reception.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Rafał Rutkowski
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN
26 Szczury w roli głównej
Dariusz Jarosz
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 531-539 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142739
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Dariusz Jarosz
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Instytut Historii Polskiej Akademii Nauk
27 Przywrócić głos rzekomo milczącym
Marcin Kula
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 541-545 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142740
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Kula
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Warszawski (emeritus)
28 Historycy grają w gry. Recenzja książki: Gra w historię, historia w grach
Bartłomiej Stolarz
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 547-555 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142741
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Bartłomiej Stolarz
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet Marii Curie‑Skłodowskiej w Lublinie
29 Historycy rosyjscy o przemianach w nauce historycznej kraju w latach dwudziestych i trzydziestych XX stulecia
Jan Krzysztof Witczak
Historyka Studia Metodologiczne | 2022 | tom 52 | 557-565 | DOI: 10.24425/hsm.2022.142714
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Authors and Affiliations

Jan Krzysztof Witczak
1
ORCID: ORCID
  1. Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza

Instructions for authors

Guidelines for authors

1) General information:
► submitted texts are reviewed and published free of charge;
► Historyka accept for publication only materials not previously published;
► Historyka accepts articles of 6000-8000 words (including footnotes and references); ► articles should be submitted in files *.doc or *.docx;
► The submitted paper should be accompanied by:
(a) a 200-word abstract (does not apply to reviews and review notes);
b) five keywords (does not apply to reviews and review notes);
c) author's ORCID number (can be generated here: https://orcid.org/signin);
d) the author's affiliation.

2) Main text:
►font: Times New Roman, 12 points
► spacing: 1.5 lines;
► longer, multi-line quotations should be separated from the main text and set in smaller font (10 points), separated from the main text with one empty line from the top and bottom; ►omissions in the quoted passage should be marked with square brackets [...];
► titles of books, newspapers, magazines, journals, films, musical works, works of art, etc. should be italicized, whereas titles of articles or book chapters, etc. should be marked with quotation marks;
► in the main text, please give full names at least the first time a given character appears, e.g. John Kowalski (the next time - it can be just the surname; avoid the form: J. Kowalski); ► in numerical expressions that specify a range (e.g. 3-20 [pages], years 1888-1900), use a semi-clause -, not a dash -;
► please do not use full clause -;
► once the paper has been prepared according to the above guidelines, please check that it uses one type of font (Times New Roman), especially if some parts of the text (e.g. web addresses) have been copied from external sources. Hyperlinks should be removed;
► quotations from foreign language sources should be translated (without giving their original wording, unless it belongs to the body of the paper) - if the author of the translation is the author of the article, it should be noted in a footnote in the first example: "Citation in translation by the authors of the paper".
► expanded numbers in the records of acts, scenes, chapters: in the third act, in the fifth scene, the eighth chapter.
► titles of legal acts: without quotation marks, first word in the title in capitals, e.g. Decree on the Punishment of Fascist Criminals.
► terms in foreign languages: in italics (e.g. terrorscapes).

3) Figures:
► files: *.jpg or *.tiff;
► resolution: min. 300 dpi at long side 10 cm, compression min. 10;
► Figures for publication must be of good quality, standardized form and descriptions;
► each figure should be provided as a separate file with its name (consistent with the description); tables, diagrams, charts, drawings and photographs should be numbered and adequately described;
► description of the figure: figure number, description, date (and place if not obvious from the context), information on the author or source.

4) Footnotes:
► use Chicago style ( https://www.citationmachine.net/chicago);
► font: Times New Roman, 10 points;
► line spacing: 1 line;
► please write consecutive bibliographic entries in footnotes in a consistent manner;
► please write the full name of the authors, editors, translators of the texts at the first appearance (only the surname in subsequent editions);
► do not use abbreviations in either English or Latin (e.g. idem, eadem, ibidem, or ibid.)
► in footnotes, include the publishers of the works cited; Example:
Michel Foucault, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Richard Howard (New York: Random House, 1988), 67.
► the first time an publication appears in a footnote, the full title (i.e., title and subtitle) of the work must be given; example:
Allan Megill, H istorical Knowledge, Historical Error. A Contemporary Guide to Practice (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007), 55–65.
[in subsequent footnotes] example:
Megill, Historical Knowledge, 65.
► example of a footnote of an article in a collective volume:
Marek Tamm, „Future-Oriented History”, in: Historical Understanding. Past, Present, and Future, ed. Zoltán Boldizsár Simon, Lars Deile (Bloomsbury: London, 2022), 163.
[in subsequent footnotes] example:
Tamm, “Future-Oriented History”, 176.
► example of a journal article footnote:
Bruno Latour, „Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”, Critical Inquiry 30 (Winter 2004): 225–248.
[in subsequent footnotes] example:
Latour, „Why Has Critique”, 110.
► Further guidelines for Chicago-style citation: ( https://www.citationmachine.net/chicago)

5) Acknowledgements:
The article should be accompanied by acknowledgements, which include information about:
► the contribution of any co-authors to the publication;
► sources of funding for the publication, contributions from scientific and research institutions, associations and other entities.

6) References:
► the article must be accompanied by references listing all works cited;
► the bibliographic notation in the references is different from that used in footnotes:
a) Book:
Megill, Allan. Historical Knowledge, Historical Error. A Contemporary Guide to Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2007.
b) Multiauthored volume: Tamm, Marek. „Future-Oriented History”. In: Historical Understanding. Past, Present, and Future, ed. Zoltán Boldizsár Simon, Lars Deile, 163–190. Bloomsbury: London, 2022.
c) Article in journal:
Latour, Bruno. „Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern”, Critical Inquiry 30 (Winter 2004): 225–248.

Publication Ethics Policy

PUBLICATION ETHICS AND PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE


The following are the standards of expected ethical behaviour for all parties involved in publishing in the Historyka journal: the author, the journal editor and editorial board, the peer reviewers and the publisher.
All the articles submitted for publication in Historyka are peer reviewed for authenticity, ethical issues and usefulness.


DUTIES OF EDITORS


Monitoring the ethical standards: Editorial board is monitoring the ethical standards of scientific publications and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices.

Fair play: Submitted manuscripts are evaluated for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, citizenship, or political ideology.

Publication decisions: The editor is responsible for deciding which of the submitted articles should or should not be published. The decision to accept or reject a paper for publication is based on its importance, originality, clarity, and its relevance to the scope of the journal.

Confidentiality: The editor and the members of the editorial board must ensure that all materials submitted to the journal remain confidential while under review. They must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher.

Disclosure and conflict of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in the submitted manuscript must not be used by the editor and the editorial board in their own research without written consent of authors. Editors always precludes business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.

Maintain the integrity of the academic record: The editors will guard the integrity of the published academic record by issuing corrections and retractions when needed and pursuing suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct. Plagiarism and fraudulent data is not acceptable.

Editorial board always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed.

Retractions of the articles: Journals editors will consider retracting a publication if:
- they have a clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error)
- the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper cross-referencing, permission or justification (cases of redundant publication)
- it constitutes plagiarism or reports unethical research.

Notice of the retraction should be linked to the retracted article (by including the title and authors in the retraction heading), clearly identify the retracted article and state who is retracting the article. Retraction notices should always mention the reason(s) for retraction to distinguish honest error from misconduct.

Retracted articles will not be removed from printed copies of the journal nor from electronic archives but their retracted status will be indicated as clearly as possible.


DUTIES OF AUTHORS


Reporting standards: Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. The paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. The fabrication of results and making of fraudulent or inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and may cause rejection or retraction of a manuscript or a published article.

Originality and plagiarism: Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others they need to be cited or quoted. Plagiarism and fraudulent data is not acceptable.

Data access retention: Authors may be asked to provide the raw data for editorial review, should be prepared to provide public access to such data, and should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication of their paper.

Multiple or concurrent publication: Authors should not in general publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Authorship of the manuscript: Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the report study. All those who have made contributions should be listed as co-authors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Acknowledgement of sources: The proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. The authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the scope of the reported work.

Fundamental errors in published works: When the author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


DUTIES OF REVIEWERS

Contribution to editorial decisions: Peer reviews assist the editor in making editorial decisions and may also help authors to improve their manuscript.

Promptness: Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its timely review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself/herself from the review process.

Confidentiality: All manuscript received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except those authorized by the editor.

Standards of objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with appropriate supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of sources: Reviewers should identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by authors. Any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper should be reported to the editor.

Disclosure and conflict of Interest: Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider evaluating manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relations with any of the authors, companies, or institutions involved in writing a paper.


Peer-review Procedure

PEER-REVIEW PROCESS

1) All submissions to Historyka are subjected to peer-review.
2) Authors are obliged to participate in peer review process.
3) Peer-review is defined as obtaining advice on individual manuscripts from at least two academic experts in the field.
4) Publishers and editors make sure that the appointed reviewers have no conflict of interest.
5) Reviewers are required to offer objective judgments, to point out relevant published work which is not yet cited.
6) The review has a written form and concludes with unequivocal decision concerning submitted article.
7) The reviewers judge whether or not the submission qualifies for publication, taking into account the following criteria (among others): whether the subject is treated in an innovative manner; whether the article takes into account recent subject literature; whether the methodology is adequate; the article’s impact on the current state of research in the field.
8) Reviewed articles are treated confidentially (double-blind review process).
9) The reviews remain confidential.
10) All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
11) Once a year in the printed issue of the journal as well as on the website of Historyka the editorial board will publish a list of reviewers collaborating with the journal.
12) Reviewers use the following form when evaluating an article

Reviewers

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2012

dr hab. Maciej Bugajewski (UAM), prof. Keely Stauter-Halsted (University of Illinois), dr hab. Violetta Julkowska (UAM), prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Libera (UJ) , prof. dr hab. Andrzej Nowak (UJ), prof. dr hab. Ryszard Nycz (UJ), dr hab. Łukasz Tomasz Sroka (UP), prof. dr hab. Rafał Stobiecki (UŁ), Dr hab. Wiktor Werner, prof. UAM (UAM), dr hab. Mariusz Wołos, prof. UP (UP), prof. Nathan Wood (University of Kansas), dr hab. Anna Ziębińska-Witek (UMCS)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2013

Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza), Adam Izbebski (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), Barbara Klich-Kluczewska (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), Marcin Kula (Uniwersytet Warszawski), Wojciech Piasek (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika), Radosław Poniat (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku), Isabel Röskau-Rydel (Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie), Roma Sendyka (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), Jarosław Stolicki (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), Jan Swianiewicz (Uniwersytet Warszawski), Marek Wilczyński (Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN w Krakowie), Piotr Witek (Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej), Marek Woźniak (Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej), Anna Ziębińska-Witek (Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2014

Jan Surman (Herder-Institut, Marburg), Zbigniew Romek (IH PAN), Andrzej Chwalba (UJ), dr hab. prof. UW Michał Kopczyński (UW), dr hab. Maciej Bugajewski (UAM), Marek Woźniak (UMCS), Piotr Witek (UMCS) , Barbara Klich Kluczewska (UJ), Marcin Jarząbek (UJ), Maria Kobielska (UJ) MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2015 Sebastian Bernat (Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej), Tomasz Falkowski (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza), Dorota Głowacka (University of King's College), Maciej Jabłoński (Uniwersytet Adama Mickiewicza), Bartłomiej Krupa (Instytut Badań Literackich PAN), Marcin Kula (Akademia Teatralna im. Aleksandra Zelwerowicza w Warszawie, Uniwersytet Warszawski [emeritus]), Mirosława Kupryjanowicz (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku), Jacek Leociak (Instytut Badań Literackich PAN), Maria Lityńska-Zając (Instytut Archeologii i Etnologii PAN), Anna Muller (University of Michigan), Tomasz Pawelec (Uniwersytet Śląski), Katarzyna Pękacka-Falkowska (Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu), Wojciech Piasek (Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika), Bożena Popiołek (Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie), Roma Sendyka (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), Ewelina Szpak (Instytut Historii PAN), Wojciech Tylmann (Uniwersytet Gdański), Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek (Uniwersytet Śląski)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2016

Tomasz Błaszczak (Vytautas Magnus University), Krzysztof Buchowski (UwB), Andrzej Buko (UW), Paweł Bukowiec (UJ), Ewa Domańska (UAM/Stanford University), Bartosz Drzewiecki (UP), Mateusz Jerzy Falkowski (New York University), Maciej Fic (UŚ), Piotr Guzowski (UwB), Joanna Janik (UJ), Maciej Janowski (CEU/IH PAN), Dariusz Jarosz (IH PAN), Elisabeth Johann (Austrian Forest Association), Klemens Kaps (Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla), Michał Kara (IAiE PAN), Andrzej Karpiński (UW), Edmund Kizik (UG), Barbara Klassa (UG), Jolanta Kolbuszewska (UŁ), Andrea Komlosy (Universität Wien), Jacek Kowalewski (UWM), Elżbieta Kościk (UWr), Adam Kożuchowski (IH PAN), Eryk Krasucki (USz), Barbara Krysztopa-Czuprynska (UWM), Cezary Kuklo (UwB), Jacek Małczyński (UWr), Konrad Meus (UP), Grzegorz Miernik (UJK), Michael Morys-Twarowski (UJ), Jadwiga Muszyńska (UJK), Jakub Niedźwiedź (UJ), Marcin Pawlak (UMK), Radosław Poniat (UwB), Bożena Popiołek (UP), Tomasz Przerwa (UWr), Rajmund Przybylak (UMK), Andrzej Rachuba (IH PAN), Judyta Rodzińska-Nowak (UJ), Isabel Röskau-Rydel (UP), Stanisław Roszak (UMK), Tomasz Samojlika (IBS PAN), Paweł Sierżęga (URz), Volodymyr Sklokin (Ukrainian Catholic University), Maria Solarska (UAM), Jan Surman (), Aurimas Švedas (Vilnius University), Michał Targowski (UMK), Robert Twardosz (UJ), Justyna Tymieniecka-Suchanek (UŚ), Jacek Wijaczka (UMK), Hubert Wilk (IH PAN), Tomasz Wiślicz (IH PAN), Elena Xoplaki (Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen), Anna Zalewska (UMCS), Marcin Zaremba (UW), Anna Ziębińska-Witek (UMCS), Paweł Żmudzki (UW)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2017

Michał Bilewicz (UW), Anna Brzezińska (UŁ), Michał Choptiany (UMK), Jacek Chrobaczyńcki (UP), Rafał Dobek (UAM), Iwona Janicka (UG), Anna D. Jaroszynska-Kirchmann (Eastern Connecticut State University), Jolanta Kluba (Centrum Historii Zajezdnia), Piotr Koprowski (UG), Jacek Kowalewski (UWM), Wiktoria Kudela (NCN), Aleksandra Leinwand (IH PAN), Gabriela Majewska (UG), Łukasz Mikołajewski (UW), Stephan Moebius (Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz), Tim B. Müller (Hamburger Institut für Sozialforschung), Tomasz Pawelec (UŚ), Wioletta Pawlikowska-Butterwick (IH PAN), Wojciech Piasek (UMK), Radosław Poniat (UwB), Zbigniew Romek (IH PAN), Izabela Skórzyńska (UAM), Ewa Solska (UMCS), Rafał Stobiecki (UŁ), Michał Trębacz (UŁ), Jan Swianiewicz (UW), Anna Waśko (UJ), Tomasz Wiślicz (IH PAN), Piotr Witek (UMCS), Joanna Wojdon (UWr), Agata Zysiak (UW)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2018

Magdalena Barbaruk (University of Wrocław), Radosław Bomba (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Joana Brites (Universidade de Coimbra), Anna Brzezińska (University of Lodz), Marta Chmiel-Chrzanowska (University of Szczecin), Bernadetta Darska (University of Warmia and Mazury), Paweł Dobrosielski (University of Warsaw), Dariusz Dolański (University of Zielona Gora), Maciej Dymkowski (University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Wrocław), Tomasz Falkowski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Agnieszka Gajewska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Neil Galway (Queen's University Belfast), Ryszard Gryglewski (Jagiellonian University), Maud Guichard-Marneur (Göteborgs Universitet), Mariola Hoszowska (University of Rzeszów), Marcin Jarząbek (Jagiellonian University), Karina Jarzyńska (Jagiellonian University), Violetta Julkowska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Olga Kaczmarek (University of Warsaw), Barbara Klassa (University of Gdansk), Maria Kobielska (Jagiellonian University), Jolanta Kolbuszewska (University of Lodz), Paweł Komorowski (Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences), Jacek Kowalewski (University of Warmia and Mazury), Adam Kożuchowski (Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences), Lenka Krátká (Akademie Věd České Republiky), Cezary Kuklo (UwB), Iwona Kurz (University of Warsaw), Halina Lichocka (Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences), Anita Magowska (Poznan University of Medical Sciences), Paulina Małochleb (Jagiellonian University), Andrea Mariani (Adam Mickiewicz University), Adam Mazurkiewicz (University of Lodz), Lidia Michalska-Bracha (Jan Kochanowski University), Anna Muller (University of Michigan-Dearborn), Monika Napora (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Jakub Niedźwiedź (Jagiellonian University), Anna Odrzywolska-Kidawa (Jan Dlugosz University), Magdalena Paciorek (Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences), Tomasz Pawelec (University of Silesia), Joanna Pisulińska (University of Rzeszów), Sławomir Poleszak (Institute for National Remembrance in Lublin), Aleksandra Porada (University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Wrocław), Stanisław Roszak (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Paweł Sierżęga (University of Rzeszów), Kinga Siewior (Jagiellonian University), Izabela Skórzyńska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Dorota Skotarczak (Adam Mickiewicz University), Bogusław Skowronek (Pedagogical University of Cracow), Tomasz Ślepowroński (University of Szczecin), Rafał Stobiecki (University of Lodz), Ksenia Surikova (St-Petersburg State University), Adam Szarszewski (Medical University of Gdańsk), Justyna Tabaszewska (Institute of Literary Research of Polish Academy of Sciences), Paweł Tomczok (University of Silesia), Anna Trojanowska (Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences), Izabela Trzcińska (Jagiellonian University), Marek Tuszewicki (Jagiellonian University), Bożena Urbanek (Institute for the History of Science, Polish Academy of Sciences), Jan Krzysztof Witczak (Adam Mickiewicz University), Tomasz Wiślicz-Iwańczyk (Institute of History, Polish Academy of Sciences), Joanna Wojdon (University of Wrocław), Marta Zimniak-Hałajko (University of Warsaw)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2019

Maciej Bugajewski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Agnieszka Czarnecka (Jagiellonian University), Tadeusz Czekalski (Jagiellonian University), Isabelle Davion (University of Paris), Alexander Dmitriev (Higher School of Economics. National Research University), Tomasz Falkowski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Dariusz Grzybek (Jagiellonian University), Marc Hertogh (Universitet of Groningen), Maciej Janowski (The Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Science), Violetta Julkowska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Krzysztof Korzeniowski (Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Science), Karol Kościelniak (Adam Mickiewicz University), Przemysław Krzywoszyński (Adam Mickiewicz University), Stefan Machura (Bangor University), Marianna Michałowska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Łukasz Mikołajewski (University of Warsaw), Magdalena Najbar-Agičić (University of Zagreb), Bartosz Ogórek (Pedagogical University of Kraków), Tomasz Pawelec (University of Silesia), Zdzisław Pietrzyk (Jagiellonian University), Jure Ramšak (The Science and Research Centre Koper), Myroslav Shkandrij (University of Manitoba), Paweł Sierżęga (University of Rzeszów), Volodymyr Sklokin (Ukrainian Catholic University), Dorota Skotarczak (Adam Mickiewicz University), Janusz Smołucha (Ignatianum University in Kraków), Ewa Solska (Maria Curie-Skłodowska University), Anna Sosnowska (University of Warsaw), Krzysztof Stopka (Jagiellonian University), Aurimas Švedas (Vilnius University), Mikołaj Szołtysek (University of Warsaw), Urszula Świderska-Włodarczyk (University of Zielona Gora), Wiktor Werner (Adam Mickiewicz University), Jacek Wijaczka (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Marcin Wolniewicz (The Tadeusz Manteuffel Institute of History, Polish Academy of Science), Jakub Wysmułek (Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Science), Mateusz Wyżga (Pedagogical University of Kraków)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2020

Urszula Augustyniak (University of Warsaw), Radosław Bomba (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Adam Mickiewicz University), Maciej Bugajewski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Karolina Ćwiek-Rogalska (Polish Academy of Sciences), Marek Drwięga (Jagiellonian University), Wojciech Gajewski (University of Gdansk), Antoni Grabowski (Polish Academy of Sciences), Piotr Guzowski (University of Bialystok), Adam Izdebski (Jagiellonian University), Maciej Janowski (Polish Academy of Sciences), Marcin Jarząbek (Jagiellonian University), Małgorzata Kołacz-Chmiel (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Bartosz Kołoczek (Jagiellonian University), Piotr Koryś (University of Warsaw), Danuta Kowalewska (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Piotr Kowalewski Jahromi (University of Silesia), Adam Kożuchowski (Polish Academy of Sciences), Sławomir Łotysz (Polish Academy of Sciences), Rafał Matera (University of Lodz), Włodzimierz Mędrzecki (Polish Academy of Sciences), Tomasz Mojsik (University of Bialystok), Bartosz Ogórek (Pedagogical University of Cracow), Wojciech Piasek (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Stanisław Roszak (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Jan Skoczyński (Jagiellonian University), Ewa Solska (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Marcin Stasiak (Jagiellonian University), Rafał Stobiecki (University of Lodz), Jan Swaniewicz (Stołeczne Centrum Edukacji Kulturalnej im. Komisji Edukacji Narodowej), Piotr Weiser (Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University), Wiktor Werner (Adam Mickiewicz University), Marek Więcek (Małopolskie Centrum Nauki Cogiteon/ Jagiellonian University), Jacek Wijaczka (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Magdalena Zdrodowska (Jagiellonian University)

MANUSCRIPTS REVIEWERS 2021

Ada Arendt (University of Warsaw), Gabriel Borowski (Jagiellonian University), Lidia Bracha (Jan Kochanowski University), Krzysztof Brzechczyn (Adam Mickiewicz University), Maciej Bugajewski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Anita Całek (Jagiellonian University), Stanisław Czekalski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Bartosz Działoszyński (University of Warsaw), Jerzy Franczak (Jagiellonian University), Brygide Gasztold (Koszalin University of Technology), Małgorzata Głowacka-Grajper (University of Warsaw), Agnieszka Gondor-Wiercioch (Jagiellonian University), Violetta Julkowska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Andrzej Karpiński (Polish Academy of Sciences), Edmund Kizik (University of Gdańsk), Małgorzata Kołacz-Chmiel (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Danuta Kowalewska (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Marcin Kula (University of Warsaw), Piotr Kuligowski (Polish Academy of Sciences), Marta Kurkowska-Budzan (Jagiellonian University), Jacek Leociak (Polish Academy of Sciences), Arkadiusz Marciniak (Adam Mickiewicz University), Magdalena Matczak (University of Liverpool), Konrad Matyjaszek (Polish Academy of Sciences), Jerzy Mazurek (University of Warsaw), Maciej Michalski (Adam Mickiewicz University), Wojciech Opioła (University of Opole), Joanna Orzeł (University of Łódź), Michał Pawleta (Adam Mickiewicz University), Ivan Peshkov (Adam Mickiewicz University), Jarosław Pietrzak (Pedagogical University of Cracow), Jan Pomorski (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Radosław Poniat (Uniwersytet w Białymstoku), Maciej Ptaszyński (University of Warsaw), Anna Ratke-Majewska (University of Zielona Gora), Andrzej Radomski (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Paweł Rodak (University of Warsaw), Tadeusz Rutkowski (University of Warsaw), Roma Sendyka (Jagiellonian University), Izabela Skórzyńska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Maria Solarska (Adam Mickiewicz University), Ewa Solska (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Monika Stobiecka (University of Warsaw), Jan Swianiewicz (Stołeczne Centrum Edukacji Kulturalnej w Warszawie), Rafał Szmytka (Jagiellonian University), Wiktor Werner (Adam Mickiewicz University), Hubert Wierciński (University of Warsaw), Wiesław Caban (Jan Kochanowski University), Jacek Wijaczka (Nicolaus Copernicus University), Tomasz Wiślicz (University of Warsaw), Władysław Witalisz (Jagiellonian University), Stanisław Witecki (Jagiellonian University), Piotr Witek (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Marek Woźniak (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Anna Zalewska (Maria Curie-Sklodowska University), Jakub Zamorski (Jagiellonian University), Edyta Zierkiewicz (University of Wrocław).

REVIEWERS 2022

Michał Jacek Baranowski, University of Warsaw; Katarzyna Błachowska, University of Warsaw; Zofia Brzozowska, University of Łódź; Kathryn Ciancia, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Amir Duranovic, University of Sarajevo; Agnieszka Dziuba, Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski; Gabor Egry, Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Tomasz Falkowski. Adam Mickiewicz University; Andrzej Gałganek, Adam Mickiewicz University; Theresa Garstenauer, University of Vienna; Wacław Gojniczek, Uniwersytet Śląski; Elisabeth Haid, Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Marcin Jarząbek, Jagiellonian University; Eriks Jekabson, University of Latvia; Violetta Julkowska, Adam Mickiewicz University; Katarzyna Kącka, Nicolaus Copernicus University; Andrzej Karpiński, University of Warsaw; Naoum Kaytchev, Sofia University 'St. Kliment Ohridski'; Barbara Klich-Kluczewska, Jagiellonian University; Iwona Krzyżanowska-Skowronek, Jagiellonian University; Cezary Kuklo, University of Bialystok; Dorota Malczewska-Pawelec, University of Silesia; Sean Martin, John Carroll University; Mariusz Mazur, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University; Roberto Mazza, University of Limerick; Janusz Mierzwa, Jagiellonian University; Andrzej Misiuk, University of Warsaw; Giuseppe Motta, Sapienza Università di Roma; Robert Miklos Nagy, Babeș-Bolyai University; Joanna Orzeł, University of Łódź; Martin Pelc, Silesia University in Opava; Radosław Poniat, University of Bialystok; James Pula, Purdue University North Central, PAHA; Konstantinos Raptis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens; Tamás Révész, Hungarian Academy of Sciences; Klaus Richter, University of Birmingham; Dariusz Sikorski, Adam Mickiewicz University; Dariusz Śnieżko, University of Szczecin; Maria Solarska, Adam Mickiewicz University; Ewa Solska, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University; Jan Surman, Czech Academy of Sciences; Alessandro Vagnini, Sapienza Università di Roma; Philipp Wirtz, SOAS University of London; Andrew Wise, Daemen College; Stanisław Żerko, Institute of Western Affairs; Aleksandar Zlatanov, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski



This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more