Management and Production Engineering Review

Content

Management and Production Engineering Review | 2018 | vol. 9 | No 3

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present an overview of the theoretical basis and stages of the process of opportunities exploration and exploitation in the development of innovativeness of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and its preliminary empirical verification on the basis of experience derived from economic practice. The aim of the paper is realized based on the author’s own empirical research carried out in the form of a case study conducted among 5 innovative SME companies in Poland. The results indicate that the analyzed companies associate opportunities directly with entrepreneurship and the development of innovative activity. They take various actions that are part of theoretical principles of effective opportunities exploration and exploitation, which allows them to obtain a number of pro-innovative benefits and which supports the creation of competitive advantage.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Matejun
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

One of the main problem of innovative projects in Russian Federation is the need to assess the impact of exogenous shocks on their financing and development. The impact of this type of shock in the period of globalization is sharply increasing. In order to assess the impact of exogenous shocks on innovative projects we create a model with two stages using the innovate project of production of water purification plants. The first stage of it is the construction of a simple model of financial risk, stipulating the conditions when investors will invest in this firm in the absence of negative shocks, their expectations will depend on their own confidence in continuing investment at the next stages. This model shows a positive result. At the second stage we take into account the impact of the negative exogenous shocks on the project, and try to trace a reaction of companies involved in financing innovative projects. The results of the project were negative. The investor in this case as a rule can stop financing and has the risk of losses. In order to prevent this situation we propose to use a real option for a possible refusal to implement an innovative project in the event that the net present value after one year of financing will be negative or very small. To our opinion it is one of the best ways to reduce financial risks during the implementation of innovative projects for investors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Oksana A. Karpenko
Tatiana K. Blokhina
Elena V. Savenkova
Ghennadiy F. Abramov
Olga V. Rybakova
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study involves the implementation of an economic order quantity (EOQ) model which is an inventory control method in a ceramic factory. Two different methods were applied for the calculation of EOQs. The first method is to determine EOQ values using a response surface method-based approach (RSM). The second method uses conventional EOQ calculations. To produce a ceramic product, 281 different and additive materials may be used. First, Pareto (ABC) analysis was performed to determine which of the materials have higher priority. Because of this analysis, the value of 21 items among 281 different materials and additives were compared to the ratio of the total product. The ratio was found to be 70.4% so calculations were made for 21 items. Usage value for every single item for the years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014, respectively, were obtained from the company records. Eight different demand forecasting methods were applied to find the amount of the demand in EOQ. As a result of forecasting, the EOQ of the items were calculated by establishing a model. Also, EOQ and RSM calculations for the items were made and both calculation results were compared to each other. Considering the obtained results, it is understood that RSM can be used in EOQ calculations rather than the conventional EOQ model. Also, there are big differences between the EOQ values which were implemented by the company and the values calculated. Because of this work, the RSM-based EOQ approach can be used to decide on the EOQ calculations as a way of improving the system performance.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ramazan Yıldız
Ramazan Yaman
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The main focus of this paper is to propose a method for prioritizing knowledge and technology factor of firms towards sustainable competitive advantage. The data has been gathered and analyzed from two high tech start-ups in which technology and knowledge play major role in company’s success. The analytical hierarchy model (AHP) is used to determine competitive priorities of the firms. Then knowledge and technology part of sense and respond questionnaire is used to calculate the variability coefficient i.e. the uncertainty caused by technology and knowledge factor. The proposed model is tested in terms of two start-ups. Based on the initial calculation of uncertainties, some improvement plan is proposed and the method is applied again to see if the uncertainty of knowledge and technology decreases. In both cases, the proposed model helped to have a clear and precise improvement plan and led in reduction of uncertainty.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Josu Takala
Sara Tilabi
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to analyze the opportunities and the challenges associated with the adoption of Information technology in the Indian SMEs. The significant usage of Information Technology in the SME sector and the factors that influence the business are discussed. SME industry in India has shown substantial growth over the past few years. The implementation of new technologies tends to offer better opportunities to the companies particularly for SME sector in India. However, there are a few challenges associated with technology adaptation that needs attention. This research is focused on improved business quality and responsiveness towards market opportunities while using the latest technologies available. This study is based on a review of research journals and articles including news magazines concerning current SME market situation in India. The current market scenario of Indian SMEs, as well as several policy interventions and new trends in the market were discussed.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ibrahim Khan
Stefan Trzcieliński
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paradox of enterprise management is the company must continually change in a dynamic and difficult-to-predict environment in order to achieve business continuity and profitability goals. The relatively low efficiency and awareness of the need for change at network organizations means the problems connecting with changes implementation, identification of conditions limiting their realizations and importance of final results are still significant. This article described this issue by the diagnosis of current state of the change management in various types of network organizations and showing how this state can be improved in the future. Assuming the organization will strive for conscious and organized change management.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Katarzyna Rostek
Daniel Młodzianowski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Six Sigma as the continuation of comprehensive quality management TQM is of interest to many enterprises. Unfortunately, not everybody successfully implements quality improvement projects using Six Sigma tools. This approach requires proper preparation in many areas of the company’s operation, including: organization of processes, establishing measures, employee engagement and creating conditions for continuous improvement. The goal of the article is to present on the case study the idea of using the organizational maturity model for production management to assess a readiness of organization to implement Six Sigma. The case study presents a company maturity level diagnosis and a successful project of quality and productivity improvement using the Six Sigma concept, confirming that the organization’s maturity model is the appropriate tool for assessing multi-faceted preparation for successful implementation of Six Sigma projects.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Kosieradzka
Olga Ciechańska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Tool travel and tool switch planning are the two major issues in hole-making operations of industrial part which involves drilling, tapping etc. operations. It is necessary to find the sequence of operations, which minimizes the total non productive time and tool switch time of hole-making operations depending upon the hole location and the tool sequence to be followed. In this work, an attempt is made to reduce total non-productive time and tool switch time of hole-making operations by applying a relatively new algorithm known as shuffled frog leaping with modification for the determination of optimal sequence of operations. In order to validate the developed shuffled frog leaping algorithm with modification, it is applied on six different problems of holes and its obtained results are compared with dynamic programming (DP), ant colony algorithm (ACO), and immune based evolutionary approach (IA). In addition, an application example of injection mould is considered in this work to demonstrate the proposed approach. The result obtained by shuffled frog leaping algorithm with modification is compared with those obtained using ACO, particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm and IA. It is observed that the results obtained by shuffled frog leaping algorithm with modification are superior to those obtained using ACO, PSO and IA for the application example presented.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Amol Macchindra Dalavi
Padmakar Jagannath Pawar
Tejinder Paul Singh
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In recent years, due to the growing importance of eco-design and tightening EU regulations entrepreneurs are required to implement activities related to environmental protection. It influences the development of methods and tools enabling the implementation of eco-design into practice, which are increasingly used by modern information technologies. They are based on intelligent solutions that allows them to better match the requirements of designers and allows for the automation of processes, and in some cases they are able to do the work themselves, replacing designers. Details are useful in areas that require calculations, comparisons and making choices, which is the process of eco-design. The paper describes methodology of pro-ecological product design oriented towards recycling, based on agent technology, enables the design of environmentally friendly products including recycling. The description of the methodology was preceded by a literature analysis on the characteristics of tools supporting eco-design and the process of its development was presented. The proposed methodology can be used at the design stage of devices to select the best product in terms of ecology. It is based on the original set of recycling indicators, used to evaluate the recycling of the product, ensure the ability to operate in a distributed design environment, and the use of data from various CAD systems, allows full automation of calculations and updates (without user participation).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ewa Dostatni
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Recent rapid developments in information and network technology have profoundly influenced manufacturing research and its application. However, the product’s functionality and complexity of the manufacturing environments are intensifying, and organizations need to sustain the advantage of huge competitiveness in the markets. Hence, collaborative manufacturing, along with computer-based distributed management, is essential to enable effective decisions and to increase the market. A comprehensive literature review of recent and state-of-the-art papers is vital to draw a framework and to shed light on the future research avenues. In this review paper, the use of technology and management by means of collaborative and cloud manufacturing process and big data in networked manufacturing system have been discussed. A systematic review of research papers is done to draw conclusion and moreover, future research opportunities for collaborative manufacturing system were highlighted and discussed so that manufacturing enterprises can take maximum benefit.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria L.R. Varela
José Machado
Goran D. Putnik
Vijay K. Manupati
Gadhamsetty Rajyalakshmi
Justyna Trojanowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Lean manufacturing [LM], quality management system and environmental management system are clear initiatives with a goal of improving effectiveness and efficiencies of organizations. Many organisations tackle lean philosophy, ISO standards individually but this kind of attempt do not focus on the synergy and the advantage from the potential collaboration. This paper aims to present the possibility of integration Lean Management concept with ISO management systems – Quality Management System [QMS] ISO 9001and Environmental Management System [EMS] ISO 14001 already implemented in the enterprises. The integration of these three concepts can be obtain due to improvement of main KPI’s defined in the organization. Based on critical research literature and participant observation presented as a case study (one of the author of the paper works as a consultant and is being implemented Lean Manufacturing concept in different organization since ten years) authors defined concept of integration of EMS and QMS (already implemented in the organization) with chosen Lean Management tools. Concept has been developed based on literature analysis and experience of the authors. Results and summary from concept implementation has been described in last chapter of the paper.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marek Wirkus
Anna Chmielarz
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

An original fuzzy team control model is presented in this article. The model is based on a non-traditional combination of classical and contemporary achievements of management and mathematical theories of fuzzy logic and fuzzy sets. In methodological terms, the article also offers a set of tools for measuring and evaluating both team performance and the effectiveness of the team control system in the organization. Fuzzy tools and techniques for decision-making, studying of hidden effects and joint influences, and quantification of evaluations are employed in this set of tools. The suggested fuzzy model contributes to overcoming theoretical deficits on the issues of team control, and the methodology of team control fills a gap in the toolkit of team management. The results from verification of the fuzzy team control model at a small-sized Bulgarian enterprise are also discussed in this article. They indicate that it is possible to develop a fuzzy model for team control, increasing the effectiveness of the team control system in the enterprise.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maya Lambovska

Instructions for authors

REVIEW PROCESS

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors.
Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected.
The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/). The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision. The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision.
All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial system ( https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process.
The material formatted in the MPER format must be unpublished and not under submission elsewhere.

REVIEWERS
Once a year a list of co-operating reviewers is publish in electronic version of MPER. All articles published in MPER are published in open access.


APC
In order to provide free access to readers, and to cover the costs of copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, and journal management, an article processing charge (APC) of 800 PLN (about 180 Euro, VAT included) for 10-page article applies to papers accepted after peer review. Each additional page of the article (over 10 pages) costs 80 PLN (about 18 Euro, VAT included).
Maximum length of the article is 18 pages (using MPER template).
There is no submission charge.

Guidelines for Authors

Template for Authors





Additional info

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics. Authorship requires taking accountability for content, consenting to publication via an author publishing agreement, giving contractual assurances about the integrity of the work, among other principles. These are uniquely human responsibilities that cannot be undertaken by AI tools. Therefore, AI tools must not be listed as an author. Authors must, however, acknowledge all sources and contributors included in their work. Where AI tools are used, such use must be acknowledged and documented appropriately.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/


Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (marta.grabowska@put.poznan.pl; mper@put.poznan.pl). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

2024
No Name Surname Affiliation
1 Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Giza , Egypr
2 Wiktor Adamus Jagiellonian University, Poland
3 Shoaib Akhtar Fatima Jinnah Women University, Pakistan
4 Mohammad Al-Adaileh "COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Engineering, Technology, and Management Assistant Professor of Instruction, United States"
5 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
6 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
7 Muhammad Asrol Binus University, Indonesia
8 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
9 Haniyah Bilal Haverford university, United States
10 Berihun Bizuneh "Bahir Dar University Bahir Dar Univ, Ethiopian Inst Text & Fash Technol, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Ethiopia"
11 Łukasz Brzeziński Katedra Organizacji i Zarządzania, Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki w Poznaniu, Poland
12 Waldemar Budner Katedra Logistyki, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Poland
13 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
14 Vishnu C R Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, India
15 Fatih Çetin Başkent Üniversitesi, Turkey
16 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
17 Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania, Romania
18 Hasan Huseyin Coban Department of Electrical Engineering, Bartin University, Turkey
19 Juan Cogollo-Florez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
20 David Coopler Universitat Politècnica de València, Romania
21 Ömer Cora Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
22 Margareta Coteata Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Romania
23 Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
24 Valentina Di Pasquale Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Italy
25 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
26 Luis Edwards Cornell University, United States
27 Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
28 Abdellah El barkany Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, Morocco
29 Chiara Franciosi CRAN UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, France
30 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
31 Tetiana Galushkina State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Ukraine
32 Józef Gawlik Cracow University of Technology, Institut of Production Engineering, Poland
33 Rohollah Ghasemi, College of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
34 Arkadiusz Gola, Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
35 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
36 Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
37 Adriana Grenčíková Industry 4.0, Human factor, Ergonomic, Slovak Republic
38 Patrik Grznár, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Žilina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
39 Anouar Hallioui INTI International University, Malaysia
40 Adam Hamrol Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
41 ni luh putu hariastuti itats, Indonesia
42 Paula Heliodoro, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, Portugal
43 Vitalii Ivanov Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools, Sumy State University, Ukraine
44 Ali Jaboob Dhofar University, Oman
45 Zamberi Jamaludin Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
46 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland
47 Satishbabu ACE India
48 Prasad Kanaka Institute of Industrial Relations and Human Resource Development, India
49 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
50 Waldemar Karwowski University of Central Florida, United States
51 Osmo Kauppila University of Oulu, Finland
52 Tauno Kekale Merinova Technology Centre, Finland
53 Mahmoud Khedr Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
54 Peter Kostal Department of Production Systems, Metrology and Asembly, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
55 Boris Kostow University of Angela Kyncheva in Ruse, Bulgaria
56 Martin Krajčovič, University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
57 Caroline  Kristian Uppsala University, Sweden
58 Robert Kucęba Wydział Zarządzania, Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
59 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology
60 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
61 Bhakaporn Kuljirundhorn Foxford University, Canada
62 Rajeev Kumar Doon University, India
63 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
64 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
65 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
66 Wojciech Lewicki West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland
67 Tetiana Likhouzova National Technical University of Ukraine, “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
68 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
69 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
70 Ildiko Mankova Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
71 Arnaud  Marcelline University of Nantes, France
72 Józef Matuszek University of Bielsko-Biała, Poland
73 Marcin Matuszny Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała
74 Giovanni Mazzuto Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Italy
75 Tomasz Małkus Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
76 Rafał Michalski Katedra Systemów Zarządzania i Rozwoju Organizacji, Politechnika Wrocławska, Poland
77 Jerzy Mikulik AGH University of Krakow, Poland
78 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
79 Norsyahida Mokhtar International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
80 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
81 Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
82 Duc Duy Nguyen Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Ho Chi Minh Technology University (HCMUT), Viet Nam
83 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
84 Filscha Nurprihatin Sampoerna University, Indonesia
85 Rebecca Oliver Stockton University, United States
86 Anita Pavlenko Kryvyi Rih State University of Economics and Technology, Ukraine
87 Aleksandar Pesic, MB University, Faculty of Business and Law, Belgrade, Serbia, Serbia
88 Huy Phan Education Technology University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
89 Anna Piekarczyk Poznan School of Logistics (WSL), Poland
90 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
91 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
92 Tengku nur Azila Raja Mamat Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Malaysia
93 Silvijo  Renato University of Rijeka, Croatia
94 Piotr Rogala Department of Quality and Environmental Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Poland
95 Michał Rogalewicz, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
96 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
97 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
98 Mansia Sadyrova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan
99 Nadia Saeed University of the Punjab, Pakistan
100 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
101 Krzysztof Santarek Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
102 shankar sehgal Panjab University Chandigarh, India
103 Piotr Senkus University of Warsaw, Poland
104 Jarosław Sęp Politechnika Rzeszowska, Wydział Budowy Maszyn i Lotnictwa, Poland
105 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
106 Dariusz Sobotkiewicz Instytut Nauk o Zarządzaniu i Jakości, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
107 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
108 Klaudia Tomaszewska Faculty of Management Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
109 Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Poland
110 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
111 Somporn Vongpeang Faculty of Technical Education, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thailand
112 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics, Czech Republic
113 Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber Poznań University of Technology, Poland
114 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
115 Linda Winters Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
116 Zbigniew Wisniewski Lodz University of Technology, Poland
117 Piotr Wróblewski Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology and Economics H. Chodkowska in Warsaw, Poland
118 Iseul  Young Hanyang University, Korea (South)
119 Chong Zhan Hubei University, China
120 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland


2025
No. Name Surname Affiliation
1 akshat gaurav akshat Asia University, Taiwan
2 luma Al-kindi University of Technology, Iraq
3 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
4 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
5 Gilmar Batalha Universidade de Sao PauloUniv Sao Paulo, Mech Engn Dept, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Brazil
6 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
7 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
8 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
9 Dorota Czarnecka-Komorowska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
10 SUGANYA Devi National Institute of Technology,Silchar, India
11 Jacek Diakun Poznan University of Technology, Poland
12 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
13 João Furtado Santa Cruz do Sul University, Brazil
14 Bożena Gajdzik "Politechnika Śląska Wydział Inżynierii Materiałowej Katedra Informatyki Przemysłowej, Poland"
15 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
16 Remigiusz Gawlik Department of Public Management, Krakow University of Economics (KUE), Poland
17 Raja Reddy GNV University of Saskatchewan, Canada
18 Arkadiusz Gola Department of Production Informatisation and Robotisation, Lublin University of Technology,Poland
19 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran, Iran
20 Cristian Gómez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
21 José-Armando HIDALGO CRESPO ENSAM, Spain
22 Magdalena HRYB Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
23 Katarzyna Hys Opole University of Technology, Poland
24 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska "Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland"
25 Amirhossein Karamoozian, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
26 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
27 khaoula khlie Liwa college, Morocco
28 Jerzy Kisilowski
29 Peter Kostal, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
30 Herbert Kotzab Institute for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, University of Bremen, Germany
31 Martin Krajčovič University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
32 Krzysztof Krystosiak Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management, Canada
33 Wiesław Kuczko Poznan University of Technology, Poland
34 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
35 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
36 Anup Kumar Inst Management Technol NagpurInst Management Technol Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, India
37 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
38 Quynh Le Song Thanh Ho Chi Minh Technology University, Viet Nam
39 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
40 Stanisław Legutko Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland, Poland
41 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
42 José Machado University of Minho · School of Engineering, Portugal
43 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
44 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
45 Tomasz Malkus Department of Management Process, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
46 Mengistu Manaye, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
47 Marcin Matuszny, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland
48 Tomasz Małkus, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
49 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
50 Beata Mrugalska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
51 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
52 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
53 Shimon Nof Purdue University, United States
54 Hana Pacaiová KLI, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
55 Arun Kiran Pal Printing Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, India
56 Michal Patak University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
57 Ivan Pavlenko Department of General Mechanics and Machine Dynamics, Sumy State University, Ukraine
58 Miriam Pekarcikova Department of industrial and digital engineering, Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
59 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
60 Praveen Prabhu School of Engineering and Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur., India
61 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
62 Paulina Rewers Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
63 Michał Rogalewicz Division of Production Engineering, Institute of Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
64 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
65 David Romero Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
66 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
67 Abdu Salam Abdul Wali Khan Univ MardanAbdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Comp Sci, Mardan 23200, Pakistan, Pakistan
68 fernando sampaio KMITL, Brazil
69 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
70 Iman Sharaf "Higher Technological Institute - Egypt Higher Technol Inst, Dept Basic Sci, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt"
71 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
72 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
73 Robert Ulewicz Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
74 Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka, Poland
75 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
76 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Czech Republic
77 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
78 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more