Management and Production Engineering Review

Content

Management and Production Engineering Review | 2021 | vol. 12 | No 2

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Many stages of growth models have been introduced to clarify management priorities during the early stages of business growth. However, many of these models are conceptual and universal, providing only limited benefits to specific industries and business contexts. The early stages of technology-based ventures have attracted broad interest, while less attention has been paid to the early stages of service-based firms. However, in recent years, interest in service-based businesses, as well as servitisation, has grown. This literature-based study explores and compares the early stages of growth in service-based and technology-based firms. On one hand, this study condenses the basic characteristics of recent empirical studies on the early stages of technology- and service-based firms. On the other, this study clarifies the central themes, sequential patterns and central differences in the early stages of service- and technology-based firms. This study pinpoints the importance of contextual understanding related to the early stages of business growth and encourages the scholars towards bridging the contextual gaps of this stream of literature.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Matti Muhos
1
Martti Saarela
1
Anna-Mari Simunaniemi
1
Del Foit Jr.
2
Lada Rasochova
2

  1. University of Oulu, Kerttu Saalasti Institute, Finland
  2. University of California San Diego, United States
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Recently, the expand of industrial market has led to have long supply chain network. During the long shipment, the probability of having damaged products is likely to occur. The probability of having damaged products is different between stages and that could lead to higher percentage of damaged products when arrived at retailers. Many companies have rejected the entire shipment because the damaged product percentage was higher than that agreed on. Decision-makers have tried to reduce the percentage of damaged products that happened because the transit, loading unloading the shipment, and natural disasters. Companies started to implement recovery centers in the supply chain network in order to return their system steady statues. Recovery models have been developed in this paper to reduce the damaged percentage at minimum costs to do so. Results show that the possibility of implementing an inspection unit and a recovery centers in the system before sending the entire shipment to the retailer based on examining a sample size that has been selected randomly from the shipment and the minimum cost of committing type I and type II errors. Designing a methodology to minimize the total cost associated with the supply chain system when there is a possibility of damage occurring during shipping is the objective of this research.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mastoor M. Abushaega
1 4
Yahya H. Daehy
2
Saleh Y. Alghamdi
3
Krishna K. Krishnan
2
Abdulrahman Khamaj
1

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Jazan University, Jazan, KSA
  2. Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS, USA
  3. Industrial Engineering Department, King Khalid University, Abha, KSA
  4. Industrial and Systems Engineering Department, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Wear of the working surfaces of the forging dies in the process of manufacturing products with the die forging technique leads to deterioration of their operational properties as well as their technological quality. A characteristic feature of production in small and medium-sized enterprises is the high variability of the product range and short production series, which can be repeated in the case of re-orders by customers. In this type of production conditions, a technological criterion in form of – a change in the characteristic and selected dimension of forging is usually used to assess the quality of products. An important problem is, whether by taking up another order for a series of the same type of product, it will be possible to implement it with the existing die, or should a new die be made? As a result of the research carried out in the company implementing this type of contract, a procedure was proposed for forecasting the abrasive wear of die working surfaces on the basis of a technological criterion, easy to determine in the conditions of small and medium-sized enterprises. The paper presents the results of the wear assessment of a die made out of hot-work tool steel X37CrMoV5-1 (WCL) and dies made of 42CrMo4 alloy structural steel with hardfacing working surfaces by F-818 wire. To determine and forecast the process of die wear, a mathematical model in the form of neural networks was used. Their task was to forecast the ratio of the increment in introduced wear intensity indicator to the number of forgings made during the process. Taking into account
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Krajewska-Spiewak
1
ORCID: ORCID
Jan Turek
2
Józef Gawlik
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Cracow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
  2. Jasło, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Facing severely competitive global markets, managers of the modern transnational corporations must effectively integrate its intra-supply chain system to meet customers’ multiproduct demands with good quality items, minimum operating expenses, and in a timely delivery matter. Inspired by assisting current transnational firms to achieve the mission, this study builds a mathematical model to explore a multiproduct fabrication-shipment problem incorporating an accelerated rate and ensured product quality. A single machine production scheme under a common cycle policy and with random defects, rework, and an accelerated fabrication rate is considered. The speedy rate option is associated with extra setup and linear variable costs, which aims to cut short the common cycle time. Mathematical derivation is employed to find the long-run average system expense. The optimization method is used to jointly derive the decision for common length and delivery frequency per cycle for the problem. Numerical illustration is offered to confirm the applicability of the results and expose the individual/combined influences of diverse crucial system features on the problem, thus facilitate the intra-supply chain’s fabrication-shipment decision making.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yuan-Shyi Peter Chiu
1
Victoria Chiu
2
Hong-Dar Lin
1
Tiffany Chiu
3

  1. Faculty of Industrial Engineering & Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung City 413, Taiwan
  2. Faculty of Accounting, Finance and Law, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, NY 13126, USA
  3. Faculty of Anisfield School of Business, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, NJ 07430, USA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) technology is a highly complex process connected with high risk and uncertainty due the high variability underground strata, often limited access to specialised equipment, dynamic natural environment, technical disruptions, human factor and changes in economic environment that further complicate the gathering of reliable information and data. This work presents a new risk evaluation model tailored for HDD technology, in which failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) modelling were applied. This paper focuses on 15 human risk factors and 9 equipment risk factors in HDD technology. The proposed approach takes into account not only the probability of the risk factor occurrence, but also its severity and the possibility of detecting faults, which were not clearly separated and analyzed in the previous works. Application of the proposed model shows the relationship between occurrence, severity and detection for the analyzed failures. Moreover, many detection possibilities for the identified failures were presented. The calculated risk priority numbers allowed to rank HDD failures and identify the most critical risks for which one should look for risk treatment possibilities beyond risk cause reduction, such as risk effect reduction, risk transfer, risk elimination or active risk retention.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Maria Krechowicz
1
ORCID: ORCID
Wacław Gierulski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Stephen Loneragan
2
Henk Kruse
3

  1. Kielce University of Technology, Poland
  2. HDD Engineering, Australia
  3. Deltares, the Netherlands
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Traditional clustering algorithms which use distance between a pair of data points to calculate their similarity are not suitable for clustering of boolean and categorical attributes. In this paper, a modified clustering algorithm for categorical attributes is used for segmentation of customers. Each segment is then mined using frequent pattern mining algorithm in order to infer rules that helps in predicting customer’s next purchase. Generally, purchases of items are related to each other, for example, grocery items are frequently purchased together while electronic items are purchased together. Therefore, if the knowledge of purchase dependencies is available, then those items can be grouped together and attractive offers can be made for the customers which, in turn, increase overall profit of the organization. This work focuses on grouping of such items. Various experiments on real time database are implemented to evaluate the performance of proposed approach.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Juhi Singh
1
Mandeep Mittal
2

  1. Department of Computer Science, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Delhi, India
  2. Department of Mathematics, Amity Institute of Applied Sciences, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Noida, India
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

castings. The possibility of reducing the total volume of machining allowances, reducing the wear of cutting tools, shortening machining time and eliminating idle machining passes was considered. The tests were carried out on two batches of castings supplied by two independent foundries. Casting geometry measurements were made using a structured light scanner. The analysis included machining with cemented carbide tools and tool ceramics at two machining centers: DMC200U and DMC270U. It has been shown that as a result of eliminating idle machining passes, it is possible to reduce machining time by 12% for the first and by 44% for the second casting supplier. The estimated annual savings for the production volume of 500 pcs of these castings can range from € 7388 to even € 23 346. The actual cost of cheaper casts was also calculated, taking into account the difference in machining cost resulting from larger machining allowances.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Gessner
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Institute of Mechanical Technology
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of production material flow management. The proper way of logistic tasks management has an impact on the production process effectiveness and the cycle time, which is a very important factor in manufacturing. Reducing the production process cycle time results not only in the ability to provide more customers with orders but also in increasing the level of resources usage (machines, operators etc.). In order to reach the aim of improving production effectiveness, the simulation modeling was used. It is a computer method that supports a decision-making process and allows to perform experiments on production without interfering with the real process. The paper also includes a risk analysis performed to evaluate the imperfections of simulation modeling, based on the rules of fuzzy logic.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna Burduk
ORCID: ORCID
Dagmara Łapczynska
ORCID: ORCID
Piotr Popiel
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study offers an overview of how changing habits in consuming a cup of tea can contribute to make better environment. As the initial existing scenario, survey for picturing Indonesian consumers in preparing their cup of tea from dried leaves was conducted to urban and suburban citizens. According to the survey, both respondent groups were using LPG as the first choice in boiling water for preparing tea, followed by using an electric dispenser as the second choice. This habit causes CO2 emission from processing a cup of tea by Indonesian consumer was 24 g CO2-eq per cup of tea, excluding the tea organic waste. The portion of CO2 emission from boiling water in tea preparation was 41.93% of whole CO2 emission from plantation to served cup. The emission can be significantly reduced by converting dried tea (initial scenario) into the ready-to-drink product, in the form of powdered tea (second scenario) and boxed tea (third scenario). This study simulated an integrated system of tea product manufacturing system with biogas utilization produced from tea organic waste. Simulation conducted based on daily manufacturing process at the Gamboeng green tea factory. Additional required energies were simulated from the wood pellet, which is the best practice in the Gamboeng Tea factory. By shifting tea consuming habit from dried tea to powdered tea and/or boxed tea, the emission from a cup of tea can be reduced, with range of reduction varied from 8.87 g to 22.13 g CO2-eq per cup of tea. If the Gamboeng green tea daily production capacity of the factory is fully converted into powdered tea, the potency of CO2 emission reduction reaches 26.92 metric ton CO2. However, the factory should pay attention to providing the water for the manufacturing process. The required water was 45.23 m3 of drinking water if all dried tea converted to powdered tea. Moreover, 11.53 m3 of water is required as irrigation for the biogas process in converting all tea organic waste into biogas.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Teuku Beuna Bardant
1
Arief Ameir Rahman Setiawan
2 5
Muthia Syafika Haq
3
Hafiizh Prasetia
5
Adhi Irianto Mastur
3
Sugeng Harianto
3
Agusta Samodra Putra
4 5
Anny Sulaswatty
1
Edi Iswanto Wiloso
5
Ryozo Noguchi
4

  1. Research Center for Chemistry, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI),Kawasan Puspiptek, Serpong, Tangerang Selatan, Indonesia
  2. Graduate School of Sciences and Engineering, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  3. Research Institute for Tea and Cinchona, Mekarsari, Gambung, Bandung, Indonesia
  4. Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
  5. Research Center for Policy and Management of Science, Technology and Innovation,Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jl. Gatot Subroto 10, Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution, also known as Industry 4.0, is about connecting the physical world with the virtual world in real-time. With the advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, manufacturing companies are introducing a number of solutions that increase productivity and personalize finished products in line with the idea of Industry 4.0. The application of, among others, the following: 3D printing, the Internet of Things, Big Data, cyber-physical systems, computing clouds, robots (collaborating and mobile), Radio-frequency identification systems, and also quality control and reverse engineering systems, is becoming popular. There are still not enough studies and analyses connected with the Polish 3D printing market, and also attempt to determine the attitude of those studies and analyses to the implementation of the Industry 4.0 conception. In connection with what is stated above, the principal objective of this paper is to determine the directions of the 3D printing industry development. In this publication, it is as well the survey respondents’ opinions relevant to opportunities and threats connected with the implementation of the Industry 4.0 conception in an enterprise are presented. The survey was conducted on a group of 100 enterprises and scientific research institutes in Poland, offering and/or applying additive technologies.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Joanna Wozniak
1
Grzegorz Budzik
2
Łukasz Przeszłowski
2
Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska
1

  1. Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Management, Rzeszów, Poland
  2. Rzeszow University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Aeronautics, Rzeszów, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Digitization in the production area represents the integrated planning and management of production and logistics systems and networks based on digital models, methods, and tools, which are built on a common flexible information and communication platform. Currently known and used Lean tools need to be dynamized and oriented to the creation of digital business, where digital models can be heterogeneous, respectively usable in several projects. One of these possibilities is the use of the Lean production method – Value Stream Mapping, the potential of which in the context of the above mentioned is great. The aim of the presented article is based on Gemba analysis of the production process to process the value stream in the environment of the software tool TX Plant Simulation for the needs of flexible reflection on changes in various parameters within the value stream. The case study carried out under this article aims, among other things, to highlight the importance of combining simple Lean Production tools with software in finding, testing, and designing alternative solutions. The potential of using the processed model was also processed for the needs of digitization of business processes in the future.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Miriam Pekarcíková
1
Peter Trebuna
1
Marek Kliment
1
Štefan Král
2
Michal Dic
1

  1. Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Management, Industrial andDigital Engineering, Park Komenského 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovak Republic
  2. Slovak Legal Metrology n.o., Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Knowledge management is a process aimed at enriching and effectively using knowledge assets in various areas of business operations. It also applies to manufacturing enterprises that offer tangible products combining it with the art of processing information and intellectual assets into added value for the customer. A characteristic feature of manufacturing enterprises is assigning their employees a double role: a knowledge user and, at the same time, an internal source of specialist knowledge. In the situation of dynamically changing market conditions, there is an additional need to acquire new knowledge (in practice: often to buy knowledge) from the company’s environment. A solution in the above-mentioned scope in Poland may be digital repositories of science assets as tools for knowledge transfer to SMEs. Research institutes are an important element in the process of knowledge transfer from scientific units to the economy (e.g. they offer their services in open access). The paper presents the concept of such a repository preceded by a diagnosis of the existing state, an analysis of the recipients of the deposited content and the examination and analysis of the requirements of potential users of the repository.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Beata Starzynska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Agnieszka Klembalska
2
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
  2. Łukasiewicz Research Network – Industrial Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Poland

Instructions for authors

REVIEW PROCESS

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors.
Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected.
The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/). The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision. The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision.
All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial system ( https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process.
The material formatted in the MPER format must be unpublished and not under submission elsewhere.

REVIEWERS
Once a year a list of co-operating reviewers is publish in electronic version of MPER. All articles published in MPER are published in open access.


APC
In order to provide free access to readers, and to cover the costs of copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, and journal management, an article processing charge (APC) of 800 PLN (about 180 Euro, VAT included) for 10-page article applies to papers accepted after peer review. Each additional page of the article (over 10 pages) costs 80 PLN (about 18 Euro, VAT included).
Maximum length of the article is 18 pages (using MPER template).
There is no submission charge.

Guidelines for Authors

Template for Authors





Additional info

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics. Authorship requires taking accountability for content, consenting to publication via an author publishing agreement, giving contractual assurances about the integrity of the work, among other principles. These are uniquely human responsibilities that cannot be undertaken by AI tools. Therefore, AI tools must not be listed as an author. Authors must, however, acknowledge all sources and contributors included in their work. Where AI tools are used, such use must be acknowledged and documented appropriately.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/


Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (marta.grabowska@put.poznan.pl; mper@put.poznan.pl). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

2024
No Name Surname Affiliation
1 Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Giza , Egypr
2 Wiktor Adamus Jagiellonian University, Poland
3 Shoaib Akhtar Fatima Jinnah Women University, Pakistan
4 Mohammad Al-Adaileh "COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Engineering, Technology, and Management Assistant Professor of Instruction, United States"
5 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
6 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
7 Muhammad Asrol Binus University, Indonesia
8 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
9 Haniyah Bilal Haverford university, United States
10 Berihun Bizuneh "Bahir Dar University Bahir Dar Univ, Ethiopian Inst Text & Fash Technol, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Ethiopia"
11 Łukasz Brzeziński Katedra Organizacji i Zarządzania, Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki w Poznaniu, Poland
12 Waldemar Budner Katedra Logistyki, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Poland
13 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
14 Vishnu C R Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, India
15 Fatih Çetin Başkent Üniversitesi, Turkey
16 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
17 Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania, Romania
18 Hasan Huseyin Coban Department of Electrical Engineering, Bartin University, Turkey
19 Juan Cogollo-Florez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
20 David Coopler Universitat Politècnica de València, Romania
21 Ömer Cora Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
22 Margareta Coteata Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Romania
23 Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
24 Valentina Di Pasquale Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Italy
25 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
26 Luis Edwards Cornell University, United States
27 Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
28 Abdellah El barkany Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, Morocco
29 Chiara Franciosi CRAN UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, France
30 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
31 Tetiana Galushkina State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Ukraine
32 Józef Gawlik Cracow University of Technology, Institut of Production Engineering, Poland
33 Rohollah Ghasemi, College of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
34 Arkadiusz Gola, Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
35 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
36 Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
37 Adriana Grenčíková Industry 4.0, Human factor, Ergonomic, Slovak Republic
38 Patrik Grznár, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Žilina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
39 Anouar Hallioui INTI International University, Malaysia
40 Adam Hamrol Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
41 ni luh putu hariastuti itats, Indonesia
42 Paula Heliodoro, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, Portugal
43 Vitalii Ivanov Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools, Sumy State University, Ukraine
44 Ali Jaboob Dhofar University, Oman
45 Zamberi Jamaludin Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
46 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland
47 Satishbabu ACE India
48 Prasad Kanaka Institute of Industrial Relations and Human Resource Development, India
49 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
50 Waldemar Karwowski University of Central Florida, United States
51 Osmo Kauppila University of Oulu, Finland
52 Tauno Kekale Merinova Technology Centre, Finland
53 Mahmoud Khedr Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
54 Peter Kostal Department of Production Systems, Metrology and Asembly, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
55 Boris Kostow University of Angela Kyncheva in Ruse, Bulgaria
56 Martin Krajčovič, University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
57 Caroline  Kristian Uppsala University, Sweden
58 Robert Kucęba Wydział Zarządzania, Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
59 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology
60 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
61 Bhakaporn Kuljirundhorn Foxford University, Canada
62 Rajeev Kumar Doon University, India
63 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
64 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
65 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
66 Wojciech Lewicki West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland
67 Tetiana Likhouzova National Technical University of Ukraine, “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
68 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
69 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
70 Ildiko Mankova Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
71 Arnaud  Marcelline University of Nantes, France
72 Józef Matuszek University of Bielsko-Biała, Poland
73 Marcin Matuszny Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała
74 Giovanni Mazzuto Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Italy
75 Tomasz Małkus Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
76 Rafał Michalski Katedra Systemów Zarządzania i Rozwoju Organizacji, Politechnika Wrocławska, Poland
77 Jerzy Mikulik AGH University of Krakow, Poland
78 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
79 Norsyahida Mokhtar International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
80 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
81 Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
82 Duc Duy Nguyen Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Ho Chi Minh Technology University (HCMUT), Viet Nam
83 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
84 Filscha Nurprihatin Sampoerna University, Indonesia
85 Rebecca Oliver Stockton University, United States
86 Anita Pavlenko Kryvyi Rih State University of Economics and Technology, Ukraine
87 Aleksandar Pesic, MB University, Faculty of Business and Law, Belgrade, Serbia, Serbia
88 Huy Phan Education Technology University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
89 Anna Piekarczyk Poznan School of Logistics (WSL), Poland
90 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
91 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
92 Tengku nur Azila Raja Mamat Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Malaysia
93 Silvijo  Renato University of Rijeka, Croatia
94 Piotr Rogala Department of Quality and Environmental Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Poland
95 Michał Rogalewicz, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
96 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
97 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
98 Mansia Sadyrova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan
99 Nadia Saeed University of the Punjab, Pakistan
100 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
101 Krzysztof Santarek Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
102 shankar sehgal Panjab University Chandigarh, India
103 Piotr Senkus University of Warsaw, Poland
104 Jarosław Sęp Politechnika Rzeszowska, Wydział Budowy Maszyn i Lotnictwa, Poland
105 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
106 Dariusz Sobotkiewicz Instytut Nauk o Zarządzaniu i Jakości, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
107 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
108 Klaudia Tomaszewska Faculty of Management Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
109 Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Poland
110 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
111 Somporn Vongpeang Faculty of Technical Education, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thailand
112 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics, Czech Republic
113 Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber Poznań University of Technology, Poland
114 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
115 Linda Winters Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
116 Zbigniew Wisniewski Lodz University of Technology, Poland
117 Piotr Wróblewski Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology and Economics H. Chodkowska in Warsaw, Poland
118 Iseul  Young Hanyang University, Korea (South)
119 Chong Zhan Hubei University, China
120 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland


2025
No. Name Surname Affiliation
1 akshat gaurav akshat Asia University, Taiwan
2 luma Al-kindi University of Technology, Iraq
3 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
4 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
5 Gilmar Batalha Universidade de Sao PauloUniv Sao Paulo, Mech Engn Dept, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Brazil
6 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
7 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
8 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
9 Dorota Czarnecka-Komorowska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
10 SUGANYA Devi National Institute of Technology,Silchar, India
11 Jacek Diakun Poznan University of Technology, Poland
12 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
13 João Furtado Santa Cruz do Sul University, Brazil
14 Bożena Gajdzik "Politechnika Śląska Wydział Inżynierii Materiałowej Katedra Informatyki Przemysłowej, Poland"
15 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
16 Remigiusz Gawlik Department of Public Management, Krakow University of Economics (KUE), Poland
17 Raja Reddy GNV University of Saskatchewan, Canada
18 Arkadiusz Gola Department of Production Informatisation and Robotisation, Lublin University of Technology,Poland
19 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran, Iran
20 Cristian Gómez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
21 José-Armando HIDALGO CRESPO ENSAM, Spain
22 Magdalena HRYB Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
23 Katarzyna Hys Opole University of Technology, Poland
24 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska "Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland"
25 Amirhossein Karamoozian, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
26 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
27 khaoula khlie Liwa college, Morocco
28 Jerzy Kisilowski
29 Peter Kostal, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
30 Herbert Kotzab Institute for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, University of Bremen, Germany
31 Martin Krajčovič University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
32 Krzysztof Krystosiak Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management, Canada
33 Wiesław Kuczko Poznan University of Technology, Poland
34 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
35 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
36 Anup Kumar Inst Management Technol NagpurInst Management Technol Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, India
37 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
38 Quynh Le Song Thanh Ho Chi Minh Technology University, Viet Nam
39 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
40 Stanisław Legutko Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland, Poland
41 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
42 José Machado University of Minho · School of Engineering, Portugal
43 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
44 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
45 Tomasz Malkus Department of Management Process, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
46 Mengistu Manaye, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
47 Marcin Matuszny, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland
48 Tomasz Małkus, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
49 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
50 Beata Mrugalska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
51 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
52 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
53 Shimon Nof Purdue University, United States
54 Hana Pacaiová KLI, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
55 Arun Kiran Pal Printing Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, India
56 Michal Patak University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
57 Ivan Pavlenko Department of General Mechanics and Machine Dynamics, Sumy State University, Ukraine
58 Miriam Pekarcikova Department of industrial and digital engineering, Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
59 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
60 Praveen Prabhu School of Engineering and Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur., India
61 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
62 Paulina Rewers Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
63 Michał Rogalewicz Division of Production Engineering, Institute of Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
64 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
65 David Romero Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
66 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
67 Abdu Salam Abdul Wali Khan Univ MardanAbdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Comp Sci, Mardan 23200, Pakistan, Pakistan
68 fernando sampaio KMITL, Brazil
69 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
70 Iman Sharaf "Higher Technological Institute - Egypt Higher Technol Inst, Dept Basic Sci, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt"
71 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
72 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
73 Robert Ulewicz Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
74 Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka, Poland
75 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
76 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Czech Republic
77 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
78 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more