Management and Production Engineering Review

Content

Management and Production Engineering Review | 2022 | vol. 13 | No 4

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

To survive in the competitive challenges, the products have to be designed to meet the needs and requirements of customers, differ from the competitors, and be friendly with the environment. This research was to propose an innovative design approach for charcoal briquette packaging design to meet the customer requirements. The customer requirements were explored and translated to product characteristics by using quality function deployment. The customers’ perceptions to product visual forms were explored through the emotional design approach. Customers’ requirements and customer perceptions were integrated to create a new charcoal briquette packaging. A new packaging design and process during its life cycle was evaluated an impact on the environment through carbon footprint values. The result showed that the innovative design approach can be used to guide designer design the charcoal briquette packaging to meet the requirements and perceptions of customers, illustrate the product identity and be friendly with the environment.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Pilada Wangphanich
1
Nattapong Kongprasert
1

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Srinakharinwirot University, Thailand
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Improper planning of inventory will affect the factory operating costs, building costs, the cost of loss, and the cost of product defects due to being stored for too long which will eventually become a loss. This research discusses the processing industry which is experiencing lumpy demand. In carrying out the production process, the company has never made plans for future demand, resulting in a waste of message costs due to repeated orders of raw materials ordered to suppliers. This paper contributes to overcoming this issue by simulating future demand by using the Material Requirement Planning (MRP) method with a probabilistic Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) and Periodic Order Quantity (POQ) model. The demand in the coming period is determined using the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) method, and an aggregate plan is carried out to determine the regular cost of raw material production and optimal subcontracting. The final analysis states that the calculation of MRP on the selected items using POQ produces the lowest cost for planning S45C-F, SGT-R, and SKD11-R, while SLD-R uses the probabilistic EOQ method.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Filscha Nurprihatin
1
Glisina Dwinoor Rembulan
2
Yohanes Dwi Pratama
2

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Sampoerna University, Indonesia
  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Recently, simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability has gained increasing attention. By departing from the accurate measurements assumption, this paper investigates the effect of gauge measurement errors on the performance of the maximum generally weighted moving average (Max-GWMA) chart for simultaneous monitoring of process mean and variability under an additive covariate model. Multiple measurements procedure is employed to compensate for the undesired impact of gauge inaccuracy on detection capability of the Max- GWMA chart. Simulation experiments in terms of average run length (ARL) are conducted to assess the power of the developed chart to detect different out-of-control scenarios. The results confirm that the gauge inaccuracy affects the sensitivity of the Max-GWMA chart. Moreover, the results show that taking multiple measurements per item adequately decreases the adverse effect of measurement errors. Finally, a real-life example is presented to demonstrate how measurement errors increases the false alarm rate of the Max-GWMA chart.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Saeid Sharafi
1
Mohammad Reza Maleki
2
Ali Salmasnia
3
Reihaneh Mansoor
4

  1. Smart Research Center, Häme University of Applied Sciences, Finland
  2. Industrial Engineering Group, Golpayegan College of Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Golpayegan, Iran
  3. Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Qom, Iran
  4. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Eyvanekey, Eyvanekey, Iran
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

History has shown different approaches to improving productivity the way of companies do business. Since the early 1900s, the development of different production systems has played an increasingly remarkable role in global manufacturing countries. It seems, that the growth of understanding has widened the ideology of production systems used up to current ones. This article examines the development path of business development. It evaluates the suitability of the key tools used to support change in a modern business model in a customer-driven project business environment.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jyri Vuorela
1
Mikael Ollikainen
1
Vesa Salminen
2
Juha Varis
1

  1. Energy Systems, LUT University, Finland
  2. Smart Research Center, Häme University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyze the positioning of Ukraine in the global indices of innovative development and competitiveness, to evaluate the indicators of innovation activity and, based on the outcomes of the research, to determine the place of Ukraine in the global innovation space. The dynamics of innovation activity on an international scale based on the consolidated indicators of the Global Innovation Index are presented. Ukraine’s position in it and progress in achieving goals to better understand the processes that stimulate or constrain innovation are determined. Econometric methods to generalize the positioning of Ukraine in the global innovation space and the DEA method to study the relative individual effectiveness of the innovation environment and innovation activities in Europe are used.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Iryna Voronenko
1
ORCID: ORCID
Nataliia Klymenko
2
ORCID: ORCID
Olena Nahorna
3
ORCID: ORCID

  1. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Information Systems and Technologies, Ukraine
  2. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Economic Cybernetics, Ukraine
  3. National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Department of Marketing and International Trade, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

FMEAs have been prioritized using RPN; however, a new standard has introduced AP for prioritization. This study seeks to determine if the number of required improvement actions increases, decreases, or stays the same when using AP in place of RPN. Statistical software was used to simulate 10,000 combinations of severity, occurrence, and detection. Both AP and RPN were calculated for the 10,000 combinations. Statistical hypothesis testing was performed to determine if there was a difference between RPNs when sorted by AP and to determine if there was a difference in actions required using RPN or AP. There is a statistically significant difference between RPNs when sorted by high, medium, and low AP. Using an RPN threshold equal to or greater than 100 would result in no change in the number of actions required if prioritizing by high and medium, but would result in fewer actions required if only high is used.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Matthew Barsalou
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Automotive Industry, Germany
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Presently, digitalization is causing continuous transformation of industrial processes. However, it does pose challenges like spatially contextualizing data from industrial processes. There are various methods for calculating and delivering real-time location data. Indoor positioning systems (IPS) are one such method, used to locate objects and people within buildings. They have the potential to improve digital industrial processes, but they are currently underutilized. In addition, augmented reality (AR) is a critical technology in today’s digital industrial transformation. This article aims to investigate the use of IPS and AR in manufacturing, the methodologies and technologies employed, the issues and limitations encountered, and identify future research opportunities. This study concludes that, while there have been many studies on IPS and navigation AR, there has been a dearth of research efforts in combining the two. Furthermore, because controlled environments may not expose users to the practical issues they may face, more research in a real-world manufacturing environment is required to produce more reliable and sustainable results.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kuhelee Chandel
1
Julia Åhlén
1
Stefan Seipel
1 2

  1. Department of Computer and Geospatial Sciences, University of Gävle, Sweden
  2. Division of Visual Information and Interaction, Department of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Sweden
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Supply Chain Management (SCM) is a very important part of the industrial world, especially in the manufacturing sector. The development of the business world affects the complexity of the supply chain due to the lack of logistics infrastructure, quality of materials and components, and much more. Supply chain disruption risk mapping needs to be done due to high uncertainty, which is overcome by implementing a decision support system. Based on the background of the problem, supply chain disruption mapping uses the help of the Six Sigma method, which consists of 5 stages: Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC). The measurement of disturbance also uses the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) approach to prioritize risk. Risks that have a high assessment and cause failure need to be prioritized for improvement. This study aims to map supply chain disruptions in the current manufacturing industry based on the barriers, resistances, and causes detected for making a decision support system prototype. By implementing a decision support system in the supply chain process, it is
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Johanes Fernandes Andry
1
Filscha Nurprihatin
2
Lydia Liliana
1

  1. Department of Information Systems, Universitas Bunda Mulia, Indonesia
  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Sampoerna University, Indonesia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article is to present the application of genetic algorithm in production scheduling in a production company. In the research work the assumptions of the methodology were described and the operation of the proposed genetic algorithm was presented in details. Genetic algorithms are useful in complex large scale combinatorial optimisation tasks and in the engineering tasks with numerous limitations in the production engineering. Moreover, they are more reliable than the existing direct search algorithms. The research is focused on the effectivity improvement and on the methodology of scheduling of a manufacturing cell work. The genetic algorithm used in the work appeared to be robust and fast in finding accurate solutions. It was shown by experiment that using this method enables obtaining schedules suitable for a model. It
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Matuszny
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. University of Bielsko-Biala, Bielsko-Biała, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The study was conducted to assess and substantiate the key systemic problems of the national engineering of different countries in the context of economic globalization. To achieve this goal, the study used the author’s method to assess the dependence of mechanical engineering in Ukraine, Poland and Germany on imports of intermediate goods. According to the results, it was determined that in the periods of increasing economic globalization of mechanical engineering in Ukraine, Poland and Germany has undergone systemic destructive changes and is in a threatening state, from the standpoint of economic security. In particular, in Ukrainian and Polish mechanical engineering, the dependence on imports of high-tech intermediate goods is excessively high. In contrast, German engineering, unlike Ukraine’s and Poland’s, is less dependent on imports of high-tech products, but requires much more resource-intensive intermediate goods. It is analytically substantiated that the identified problems with the import dependence of mechanical engineering in Ukraine, Poland and Germany are the result of irrational, one-sided perception of economic globalization by the main economic entities of these countries.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Svitlana Ishchuk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Lyubomyr Sozanskyy
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Problems of the Real Sector of the Regional Economy, Institute of Regional Research named after M.I. Dolishniy of the NAS of Ukraine, Ukraine
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This paper presents the concept and methodology for the designing of a “tree-shaped” production line. The concept is a result of the search for production unit organization that meets the Lean Production assumptions, i.e. focusing on lead time (throughput time) shortening with simultaneous ability of use in conditions of varied product range. The varied product range characterized by lower technological-organizational similarity when compared to “Ushaped” units typical for Lean Production. The paper presents an algorithm for the designing of a “tree-shaped” production line and examples of its application. The designed unit underwent evaluation according to the criteria preferred by Lean Manufacturing experts. The designed production unit achieved results confirming the effectiveness of the proposed concept for the analysed sets of input data on the product range and production capacities.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Natalia Pawlak
1
Lukasz Hadas
1
Marek Fertsch
1

  1. Poznan University of Technology
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The manufacturing industry has been reshaping its operations using digital technologies for a smart production towards a more customized demand. Nevertheless, the flexibility to attend the production plan changes in real time is still challenging. Although the Internet of Services (IoS) has been addressed as a key element for Industry 4.0, there is still a lack of clarity about the IoS contribution for advanced manufacturing. Through a case study, the paper aims to validate the adherence of a theoretical model named Service-Oriented Manufacturing Architecture (SOMA) in two manufacturing companies that have been already engaged in Industry 4.0. As main results, it was concluded that IoS could suit in one case of Industry 4.0 flexible production process but not in a mass production one. Considering the scarcity of research that exemplifies the IoS contribution, the present paper brings an important assessment on a real manufacturing scenario.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jacqueline Zonichenn Reis
1
Rodrigo Franco Goncalves
1
Marcia Terra Silva
1

  1. Graduate Studies in Production Engineering, Universidade Paulista, Brazil

Instructions for authors

REVIEW PROCESS

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors.
Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected.
The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/). The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision. The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision.
All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial system ( https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process.
The material formatted in the MPER format must be unpublished and not under submission elsewhere.

REVIEWERS
Once a year a list of co-operating reviewers is publish in electronic version of MPER. All articles published in MPER are published in open access.


APC
In order to provide free access to readers, and to cover the costs of copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, and journal management, an article processing charge (APC) of 800 PLN (about 180 Euro, VAT included) for 10-page article applies to papers accepted after peer review. Each additional page of the article (over 10 pages) costs 80 PLN (about 18 Euro, VAT included).
Maximum length of the article is 18 pages (using MPER template).
There is no submission charge.

Guidelines for Authors

Template for Authors





Additional info

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics. Authorship requires taking accountability for content, consenting to publication via an author publishing agreement, giving contractual assurances about the integrity of the work, among other principles. These are uniquely human responsibilities that cannot be undertaken by AI tools. Therefore, AI tools must not be listed as an author. Authors must, however, acknowledge all sources and contributors included in their work. Where AI tools are used, such use must be acknowledged and documented appropriately.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/


Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (marta.grabowska@put.poznan.pl; mper@put.poznan.pl). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Bagus Arthaya Mechatronics Engineering Universitas Parahyangan, Indonesia
Sarini Azizan Australian National University, Australia
Zbigniew Banaszak Management and Computer Science, Koszalin University of Technology, Poland
Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
Kamila Borsekova UNIVERZITA MATEJA BELA V BANSKEJ BYSTRICI, Slovak Republic
RACHID Boutarfa Hassan First University, Morocco
Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
Virginia Casey Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Argentina
Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania, Romania
Ömer Cora Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
Wiesław Danielak Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
Jacek Diakun Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Ewa Dostatni Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Marek Dźwiarek
Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
Abdellah El barkany Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, Morocco
Francesco Facchini Università degli Studi di Bari, Italy
Mária Magdolna Farkasné Fekete Szent István University, Hungary
Çetin Fatih Başkent Üniversitesi, Turkey
Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
Mit Gandhi Gujarat Gas Limited, India
Józef Gawlik Cracow University of Technology, Institut of Production Engineering, Poland
Andrzej Gessner Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
Pedro Glass Universitatea Valahia din Targoviste, Romania
Arkadiusz Gola Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Lublin, Poland
Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska Instytut Inżynierii Bezpieczeństwa i Jakości, Zakład Marketingu i Rozwoju Organizacji, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
Damian Grajewski Production Engineering Department, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Łukasz Grudzień Production Engineering Department, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Patrik Grznár, University of Žilina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
Anouar Hallioui INTI International University, Malaysia
Ali HAMIDOGLU
Adam Hamrol Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
ni luh putu hariastuti itats, Indonesia
Christian Harito Bina Nusantara University, Indonesia
Muatazz Hazza Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department; School of Engineering. American University of Ras Al Khaimah. United Arab Emirates, United Arab Emirates"
Ali Jaboob, Dhofar University, College of Commerce and Business Administration, Oman
Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Oláh Judit University of Debrecen, Hungary
Jan Klimek Szkoła Główna Handlowa, Poland
Nataliia Klymenko National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine,
Peter Kostal Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Slovak Republic
Martin Krajčovič University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, Slovak Republic
Robert Kucęba Wydział Zarządzania, Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology
Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
Christian Landschützer Graz University of Technology, Austria
Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
Józef Matuszek
Janusz MLECZKO
Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
Maria Elena Nenni University of Naples, Italy
Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
Dinh Son Nguyen The University of Danang, University of Science and Technology, Viet Nam
Duc Duy Nguyen Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Ho Chi Minh Technology University (HCMUT), Viet Nam
Filscha Nurprihatin Sampoerna University, Indonesia
Filip Osiński Poznan University of Technology
Ivan Pavlenko Department of General Mechanics and Machine Dynamics, Sumy State University, Ukraine
Robert Perkin BorgWarner, United States
Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
Ravipudi Venkata Rao "Department of Mechanical Engineering S. V. National Institute of Technology, Surat, India"
Marta Rinaldi University of Campania, Italy
Michał Rogalewicz, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
David Romero Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
ELMADANI SAAD Hassan First university of Settat, Morocco
Krzysztof Santarek Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
shankar sehgal Panjab University Chandigarh, India
Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
Chansiri Singhtaun Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kasetsart University, Thailand
Bożena Skołud Silesian University of Technology, Poland
Lucjan Sobiesław Jagiellonian University, Poland
Fabiana TORNESE University of Salento, Italy
Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Amit Kumar Tyagi Centre for Advanced Data Science, India
Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics, Czech Republic
Radosław Wichniarek Poznan University of Technology, Poland
Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
Josef Zajac Uniwersytet Techniczny w Koszycach, Slovak Republic
Aurora Zen Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more