Management and Production Engineering Review

Content

Management and Production Engineering Review | 2023 | vol. 14 | No 3

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The dynamically changing environment forces companies to introduce changes in production processes and the need for employees to adapt quickly to new tasks. Therefore, it is expected to implement solutions to support employees. The system that will manage the work on a manufacturing line should work in real time to support the ongoing activities and, to be implemented in SMEs, must not be expensive. The authors identified important system components and expected functionalities. The methodology of the work is based on humancentered design. A concept of a cyber-physical system is proposed. The aim of the proposed edge computing-based system is to manage the work on the manufacturing line in which certain elements communicate with each other to achieve common goals. The paper presents what the system can consist of, how information and knowledge are managed in the system, and what can be the benefits for enterprises from its implementation.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Dorota Stadnicka
Andrea BONCI
Sauro LONGHI
Massimiliano PIRANI
Grzegorz DEC
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents the results of the simulation studies concerning the impact of random production interruptions on the efficiency of multi-spindle machining centers. Four different machining center configuration models were developed using a dedicated class of stochastic Petri nets. In addition to the number of machine spindles, the number of simultaneously mounted parts, loading time of parts, their machining time, and reliability parameters regarding the frequency of machine interruptions caused by random factors were also taken into account as model parameters. A series of virtual tests was carried out for machining processes over a period of 1000 hours of operation. Analysis of the results confirmed the purpose of conducting simulation tests prior to making a decision regarding the purchase of a multispindle milling center. This work fills the existing research gap, as there are no examples in the technical literature of evaluating the effectiveness of multi-spindle machining centers.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Roman STRYCZEK
1

  1. University of Bielsko-Biala, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This article focuses on the issue of innovation within enterprise strategies, with a particular emphasis on the value-creation process and the multidimensional nature of innovation. To analyze this, the focal point was the overall structure of business operations, with a particular emphasis on the involvement of employees. It was also noted that economic entities are subject to generic, market, and HR conditions. The main objective of this article is to highlight the relationships between innovation within enterprises and the conditions under which they operate. This includes the challenges faced by employees in generating creative and innovative ideas and implementing new solutions. Two research hypotheses were put forward in this article. The first hypothesis, H1, assumes that a company’s overall profile is a crucial determinant in creating value through innovation within organizations. The second hypothesis, H2, assumes that market requirements in terms of creating customer value will drive employees to implement innovation defined in the company’s strategies. The importance of open innovation in business strategic decisions was also highlighted. Using statistical methods, these hypotheses were verified through a survey conducted in various enterprises.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Beata SKOWRON-GRABOWSKA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Job Shop scheduling problem is widely used in industry and has been the subject of study by several researchers with the aim of optimizing work sequences. This case study provides an overview of genetic algorithms, which have great potential for solving this type of combinatorial problem. The method will be applied manually during this study to understand the procedure and process of executing programs based on genetic algorithms. This problem requires strong decision analysis throughout the process due to the numerous choices and allocations of jobs to machines at specific times, in a specific order, and over a given duration. This operation is carried out at the operational level, and research must find an intelligent method to identify the best and most optimal combination. This article presents genetic algorithms in detail to explain their usage and to understand the compilation method of an intelligent program based on genetic algorithms. By the end of the article, the genetic algorithm method will have proven its performance in the search for the optimal solution to achieve the most optimal job sequence scenario.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Habbadi SAHAR
1
Brahim HERROU
Souhail SEKKAT
2

  1. Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University, Faculté des Sciences Techniques de Fès, Industrial Engineering Department, Morocco
  2. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers ENSAM MEKNES, Industrial Engineering Department, Morocco
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The severe consequences of climate change have left many unanswered questions about the environmental performance of businesses. Appropriate measures must be taken to tackle the problems conquered due to climate change. This study supports exploring the factors needed to get the Employees Environmental Performance (EEP). It includes Green Human Resources (GHR), Green Creativity (GC) and Proactive Environmental Management (PEM). The relationship among the variables was explored in the existing literature. This study aims to test the relationship between GHR and GC. Further, it also examined the mediating role of GC and moderating role of PEM. For this purpose, data were collected from employees of manufacturing companies (automobiles, food processing, chemicals, textiles, machinery and equipment) in India. More specifically, ISO 14001-certified companies were selected. Among the different institutions, 35 are manufacturing in India. Out of 35, 24 companies agreed to conduct a survey in their company. Totally 5376 employees were considered as a population for the study. With 95% confidence interval, 400 samples were selected, and a questionnaire was distributed among them using simple random sampling. 305 (76.25%) cases finalized for further analysis. The collected data analyzed using PLS-SEM with R software. The results highlighted the essential role of GHR practices in the manufacturing industry to enhance EEP since GHR positively influences EEP. Moreover, it was found that GC partially mediates the relationship between GHR and EEP. It indicates the importance of GC’s existence in increasing EEP through GHR. Finally, it was also found that PEM moderates the relationship between GHR and EEP. It suggested the role of pro-environmental management and their active pace in improving EEP. Managerial implications and future scope were discussed in this study.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

V. SATHYAMOORTHI
1
S.B. INAYATH AHAMED
1
A. HARIHARASUDAN
2
Katarzyna SZCZEPANSKA-WOSZCZYNA
3
Sebastian KOT
4 5

  1. Kalasalingam Business School, Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Department of BusinessAdministration, India
  2. Kalasalingam Academy of Research and Education, Faculty of English, India
  3. WSB University, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Department of Management, Poland
  4. North-West University, Faculty of Economics and Management Sciences, South Africa
  5. Czestochowa University of Technology, Management Faculty, Czestochowa, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The article presents the possibility of increasing the production efficiency in an enterprise dealing in the production of lounge furniture. The literature review shows that Poland is the sixth country in the world in the amount of furniture production. It is also one of the leading exporters of upholstered furniture in Europe. Each year, the value of furniture sales production increases by a few percentage points. Due to the constantly growing customer orders, many companies in this industry are struggling with delays in delivering products to customers. This problem also occurs in the analyzed company. While analyzing the production process, the occurrence of a large number of non-conformities was also noticed. An analysis was carried out to indicate the number of non-conformities and the place of their occurrence. The FMEA analysis was used, which indicated which non-conformities are the most important, and the 5Why method, which allowed to indicate the cause of their occurrence. The analysis of production processes showed which activities do not bring added value and how they can be eliminated at no cost. All these measures contributed to increasing the efficiency of the production of lounge furniture.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anna KARWASZ
Paulina REWERS
Adrianna CHRZANOWSKA
Natalia CHWACINSKA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The research aims to determine the effect of green maintenance “energy efficiency, health and safety risks, and environmental compatibility“ on environmental performance “environmental condition, operational performance, and management performance“ as analytical research in oil products distribution company by distributing a questionnaire distributed to 46 people. The research problem lies in the weak use of traditional maintenance technology, which negatively affects the environment. The research found that the research company’s reliance on green maintenance is weak in adopting new mechanisms and technologies to enhance environmental performance and the weakness of the efforts exerted by management in the field of environmental performance and the failure to involve its staff in training programs to create a culture of preserving the environment within the culture of the organization. The research recommends the need to use machines with low energy consumption and reduce the volume of pollution.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Amer Abdul Latif KADHUM
Huda Adeeb HAMEED
1

  1. Rusafa Institute of Administration, Department of Materials Management Technologies, Iraq
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Maintenance involves a large amount of data management. Although many tools, strategies, and systems, have been developed to organize the maintenance information resources, SMEs have not found the same benefits as large companies due to their inherent characteristics and, above all, the maturity level of the maintenance department. Maturity models are useful tools for assessing the maturity of maintenance information practices; however, existing models are not suitable for any type of business context, as they required companies to have a clear organizational structure and definite informative infrastructure. Moreover, they do not assist in identifying and defining actions to reach the highest level. This paper proposes a model for assessing and improving maintenance management information practices. It allows a clear measure of the maturity of the maintenance information management practices in industrial contexts and provides improvement actions identifying the information and data needed to enhance maintenance management information practices.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Alessia Maria Rosaria Tortora
ORCID: ORCID
Valentina DI PASQUALE
Raffaele IANNONE
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

With continuous and rapid change in both technology and businesses due to climate change and governments regulations, Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) is receiving increasing attentions during last two decades. GSCM refers to the abilities of businesses to enhance operations and sustain environment at the same time and efficiently. In this paper, a comprehensive review of GSCM development and applications is conducted. This review aims to explore the recent developments of GSCM and necessity of adoption GSCM applications in businesses to insure sustainable development. First, a descriptive analysis of 796 paper adopted from Scopus database was conducted to review research on GSCM. Next, a bibliometric analysis of 235 paper was conducted to determine the recent trends and areas of GSCM and related keywords by using VOSviewer software. Then, a content analysis was carried out of 53 review papers by adopting WordStat software to analyze the impact of GSCM on related subjects and trends of GSCM. Finally, a summary analysis of GSCM advantages and challenges was conducted based on fundamental GSCM’s objectives. Results reveal that researches on GSCM are in upward curve with limitations in implementing GSCM applications due to high cost, and lack of sufficient experiences. Results also reveal positive moderate correlation of GSCM with environment, performance, sustainability and management practices indicating the limited implementation of GSCM applications. To further explore these limitations, this study summarized the recent challenges and future potential directions of GSCM in both businesses and environments.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ali Mohsin Salim Ba Awain
Abdullah M. Al-Ansi
Mohammed Jaboob
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study uses statistical quality control (SQC) and overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) to examine quality at a porcelain production firm. The study is motivated by the most frequently broken machines in 2019, is the Jigger 01 machine. This paper aims to evaluate the machine’s effectiveness using the OEE method. The OEE determines the scope of the problem to be solved using the SQC method. The average OEE value in 2019 was 70%. Based on the SQC method, the product defect produced is still under control. However, the average defect is still above the company’s tolerance limit of 10%. Consequently, this study offers enhancements utilizing the Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) technique. The results indicate that human resources and machines caused defective products. This paper contributes to providing several improvements that the company can apply to maximize its quality control analysis. After implementing the improvement, the OEE value increases to 74%.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Filscha Nurprihatin
Glisina Dwinoor Rembulan
Johanes Fernandes Andry
Sarah Immanuella
Ivana Tita Bella Widiwati
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This work is interested to optimize the job shop scheduling problem with a no wait constraint. This constraint occurs when two consecutive operations in a job must be processed without any waiting time either on or between machines. The no wait job shop scheduling problem is a combinatorial optimization problem. Therefore, the study presented here is focused on solving this problem by proposing strategy for making Jaya algorithm applicable for handling optimization of this type of problems and to find processing sequence that minimizes the makespan (Cmax). Several benchmarks are used to analyze the performance of this algorithm compared to the best-known solutions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Aimade Eddine BOUGLOULA
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The Controlled Atmosphere Brazing (CAB) process together with NOCOLOKr flux is associated with the occurrence of potassium fluoroaluminate residue inside the cooler. Excess of this flux residue is known to cause gelation of the coolant, which deteriorates the efficiency of the cooler. The flux residue amount is most often measured via Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS), in accordance with DIN ISO 9964-3. This is a time-consuming measurement that requires the use of specialized equipment and costly solvents. The following article presents two innovative methods for flux residue measurement after CAB process. They include Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and Reflected Light Microscopy (RLM) with Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) module. The accuracy of these methods has been compared to the reference AAS method to evaluate their potential as alternative, less expensive, and quicker measurement methods for determining the quantity of flux residue.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Sławomir Nadolny
ORCID: ORCID
Adam Hamrol
ORCID: ORCID
Michał Rogalewicz
ORCID: ORCID
Adam Piasecki
ORCID: ORCID

Instructions for authors

REVIEW PROCESS

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors.
Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected.
The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/). The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision. The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision.
All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial system ( https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process.
The material formatted in the MPER format must be unpublished and not under submission elsewhere.

REVIEWERS
Once a year a list of co-operating reviewers is publish in electronic version of MPER. All articles published in MPER are published in open access.


APC
In order to provide free access to readers, and to cover the costs of copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, and journal management, an article processing charge (APC) of 800 PLN (about 180 Euro, VAT included) for 10-page article applies to papers accepted after peer review. Each additional page of the article (over 10 pages) costs 80 PLN (about 18 Euro, VAT included).
Maximum length of the article is 18 pages (using MPER template).
There is no submission charge.

Guidelines for Authors

Template for Authors





Additional info

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics. Authorship requires taking accountability for content, consenting to publication via an author publishing agreement, giving contractual assurances about the integrity of the work, among other principles. These are uniquely human responsibilities that cannot be undertaken by AI tools. Therefore, AI tools must not be listed as an author. Authors must, however, acknowledge all sources and contributors included in their work. Where AI tools are used, such use must be acknowledged and documented appropriately.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/


Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (marta.grabowska@put.poznan.pl; mper@put.poznan.pl). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

2024
No Name Surname Affiliation
1 Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Giza , Egypr
2 Wiktor Adamus Jagiellonian University, Poland
3 Shoaib Akhtar Fatima Jinnah Women University, Pakistan
4 Mohammad Al-Adaileh "COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Engineering, Technology, and Management Assistant Professor of Instruction, United States"
5 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
6 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
7 Muhammad Asrol Binus University, Indonesia
8 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
9 Haniyah Bilal Haverford university, United States
10 Berihun Bizuneh "Bahir Dar University Bahir Dar Univ, Ethiopian Inst Text & Fash Technol, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Ethiopia"
11 Łukasz Brzeziński Katedra Organizacji i Zarządzania, Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki w Poznaniu, Poland
12 Waldemar Budner Katedra Logistyki, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Poland
13 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
14 Vishnu C R Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, India
15 Fatih Çetin Başkent Üniversitesi, Turkey
16 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
17 Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania, Romania
18 Hasan Huseyin Coban Department of Electrical Engineering, Bartin University, Turkey
19 Juan Cogollo-Florez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
20 David Coopler Universitat Politècnica de València, Romania
21 Ömer Cora Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
22 Margareta Coteata Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Romania
23 Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
24 Valentina Di Pasquale Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Italy
25 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
26 Luis Edwards Cornell University, United States
27 Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
28 Abdellah El barkany Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, Morocco
29 Chiara Franciosi CRAN UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, France
30 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
31 Tetiana Galushkina State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Ukraine
32 Józef Gawlik Cracow University of Technology, Institut of Production Engineering, Poland
33 Rohollah Ghasemi, College of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
34 Arkadiusz Gola, Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
35 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
36 Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
37 Adriana Grenčíková Industry 4.0, Human factor, Ergonomic, Slovak Republic
38 Patrik Grznár, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Žilina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
39 Anouar Hallioui INTI International University, Malaysia
40 Adam Hamrol Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
41 ni luh putu hariastuti itats, Indonesia
42 Paula Heliodoro, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, Portugal
43 Vitalii Ivanov Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools, Sumy State University, Ukraine
44 Ali Jaboob Dhofar University, Oman
45 Zamberi Jamaludin Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
46 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland
47 Satishbabu ACE India
48 Prasad Kanaka Institute of Industrial Relations and Human Resource Development, India
49 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
50 Waldemar Karwowski University of Central Florida, United States
51 Osmo Kauppila University of Oulu, Finland
52 Tauno Kekale Merinova Technology Centre, Finland
53 Mahmoud Khedr Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
54 Peter Kostal Department of Production Systems, Metrology and Asembly, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
55 Boris Kostow University of Angela Kyncheva in Ruse, Bulgaria
56 Martin Krajčovič, University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
57 Caroline  Kristian Uppsala University, Sweden
58 Robert Kucęba Wydział Zarządzania, Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
59 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology
60 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
61 Bhakaporn Kuljirundhorn Foxford University, Canada
62 Rajeev Kumar Doon University, India
63 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
64 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
65 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
66 Wojciech Lewicki West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland
67 Tetiana Likhouzova National Technical University of Ukraine, “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
68 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
69 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
70 Ildiko Mankova Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
71 Arnaud  Marcelline University of Nantes, France
72 Józef Matuszek University of Bielsko-Biała, Poland
73 Marcin Matuszny Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała
74 Giovanni Mazzuto Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Italy
75 Tomasz Małkus Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
76 Rafał Michalski Katedra Systemów Zarządzania i Rozwoju Organizacji, Politechnika Wrocławska, Poland
77 Jerzy Mikulik AGH University of Krakow, Poland
78 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
79 Norsyahida Mokhtar International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
80 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
81 Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
82 Duc Duy Nguyen Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Ho Chi Minh Technology University (HCMUT), Viet Nam
83 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
84 Filscha Nurprihatin Sampoerna University, Indonesia
85 Rebecca Oliver Stockton University, United States
86 Anita Pavlenko Kryvyi Rih State University of Economics and Technology, Ukraine
87 Aleksandar Pesic, MB University, Faculty of Business and Law, Belgrade, Serbia, Serbia
88 Huy Phan Education Technology University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
89 Anna Piekarczyk Poznan School of Logistics (WSL), Poland
90 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
91 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
92 Tengku nur Azila Raja Mamat Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Malaysia
93 Silvijo  Renato University of Rijeka, Croatia
94 Piotr Rogala Department of Quality and Environmental Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Poland
95 Michał Rogalewicz, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
96 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
97 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
98 Mansia Sadyrova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan
99 Nadia Saeed University of the Punjab, Pakistan
100 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
101 Krzysztof Santarek Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
102 shankar sehgal Panjab University Chandigarh, India
103 Piotr Senkus University of Warsaw, Poland
104 Jarosław Sęp Politechnika Rzeszowska, Wydział Budowy Maszyn i Lotnictwa, Poland
105 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
106 Dariusz Sobotkiewicz Instytut Nauk o Zarządzaniu i Jakości, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
107 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
108 Klaudia Tomaszewska Faculty of Management Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
109 Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Poland
110 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
111 Somporn Vongpeang Faculty of Technical Education, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thailand
112 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics, Czech Republic
113 Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber Poznań University of Technology, Poland
114 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
115 Linda Winters Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
116 Zbigniew Wisniewski Lodz University of Technology, Poland
117 Piotr Wróblewski Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology and Economics H. Chodkowska in Warsaw, Poland
118 Iseul  Young Hanyang University, Korea (South)
119 Chong Zhan Hubei University, China
120 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland


2025
No. Name Surname Affiliation
1 akshat gaurav akshat Asia University, Taiwan
2 luma Al-kindi University of Technology, Iraq
3 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
4 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
5 Gilmar Batalha Universidade de Sao PauloUniv Sao Paulo, Mech Engn Dept, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Brazil
6 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
7 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
8 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
9 Dorota Czarnecka-Komorowska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
10 SUGANYA Devi National Institute of Technology,Silchar, India
11 Jacek Diakun Poznan University of Technology, Poland
12 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
13 João Furtado Santa Cruz do Sul University, Brazil
14 Bożena Gajdzik "Politechnika Śląska Wydział Inżynierii Materiałowej Katedra Informatyki Przemysłowej, Poland"
15 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
16 Remigiusz Gawlik Department of Public Management, Krakow University of Economics (KUE), Poland
17 Raja Reddy GNV University of Saskatchewan, Canada
18 Arkadiusz Gola Department of Production Informatisation and Robotisation, Lublin University of Technology,Poland
19 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran, Iran
20 Cristian Gómez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
21 José-Armando HIDALGO CRESPO ENSAM, Spain
22 Magdalena HRYB Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
23 Katarzyna Hys Opole University of Technology, Poland
24 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska "Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland"
25 Amirhossein Karamoozian, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
26 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
27 khaoula khlie Liwa college, Morocco
28 Jerzy Kisilowski
29 Peter Kostal, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
30 Herbert Kotzab Institute for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, University of Bremen, Germany
31 Martin Krajčovič University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
32 Krzysztof Krystosiak Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management, Canada
33 Wiesław Kuczko Poznan University of Technology, Poland
34 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
35 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
36 Anup Kumar Inst Management Technol NagpurInst Management Technol Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, India
37 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
38 Quynh Le Song Thanh Ho Chi Minh Technology University, Viet Nam
39 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
40 Stanisław Legutko Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland, Poland
41 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
42 José Machado University of Minho · School of Engineering, Portugal
43 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
44 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
45 Tomasz Malkus Department of Management Process, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
46 Mengistu Manaye, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
47 Marcin Matuszny, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland
48 Tomasz Małkus, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
49 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
50 Beata Mrugalska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
51 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
52 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
53 Shimon Nof Purdue University, United States
54 Hana Pacaiová KLI, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
55 Arun Kiran Pal Printing Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, India
56 Michal Patak University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
57 Ivan Pavlenko Department of General Mechanics and Machine Dynamics, Sumy State University, Ukraine
58 Miriam Pekarcikova Department of industrial and digital engineering, Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
59 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
60 Praveen Prabhu School of Engineering and Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur., India
61 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
62 Paulina Rewers Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
63 Michał Rogalewicz Division of Production Engineering, Institute of Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
64 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
65 David Romero Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
66 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
67 Abdu Salam Abdul Wali Khan Univ MardanAbdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Comp Sci, Mardan 23200, Pakistan, Pakistan
68 fernando sampaio KMITL, Brazil
69 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
70 Iman Sharaf "Higher Technological Institute - Egypt Higher Technol Inst, Dept Basic Sci, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt"
71 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
72 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
73 Robert Ulewicz Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
74 Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka, Poland
75 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
76 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Czech Republic
77 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
78 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more