Management and Production Engineering Review

Content

Management and Production Engineering Review | 2021 | vol. 12 | No 4

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Simulations are becoming one of the most important techniques supporting production preparation, even in those industrial sectors with atypical technological processes, such as in metallurgy, where there is a multiphase material flow. This is due to the fact that in the conditions of a market economy, enterprises have to solve more and more complex problems in a shorter time. On the basis of the existing production process and the knowledge of the flow characteristics in a given process, a model is built, which, when subjected to simulation tests, provides experimental results in the scope of the defined problem. The use of computer techniques also creates new possibilities for the rational use of the reserves inherent in each technological process. Taking into account the existing demand and the state of modern technology, the computer model can be a source of information for further analysis and decision-making processes supporting company management. At work a model of the logistic system was made on the example of a hot-rolled steel strip mill, on which simulation experiments were carried out to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the analysis production line. The presented article aims to disseminate the idea of ??Industry 4.0 in Polish companies from the manufacturing industry sector, taking into account simulation techniques.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Mariusz Niekurzak
1
Ewa Kubińska-Jabcoń
1

  1. AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

This study investigates (1) the effect of quality information on quality performance through process control and (2) the moderating role of shop floor leadership on the relationship between quality information and quality performance in the context of manufacturing plants on a global basis. The moderated mediation analysis with a bootstrapping approach was employed to analyse data for hypotheses testing. The data is from the fourth-round dataset of the High- Performance Manufacturing Project, collected from manufacturing plants worldwide. The results indicate that (1) quality information is positively associated with quality performance through process control, and (2) shop floor leadership (i.e., supervisory interaction facilitation) positively moderates the indirect effect of quality information on quality performance; that is, the shop floor leadership practice strengthens the effect of quality information on quality performance through process control. This study also has a practical implication for top managers who should consider the vital role of leadership practices adopted by shop floor supervisors in implementing total quality management practices and should raise awareness that leadership practices are not only for the ‘C-suite’ but also for shop floor supervisors.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ngoc Anh Nguyen
Chi Phan Anh
Thi Xuan Thoa Pham
Matsui Yoshiki
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The present paper describes a methodological framework developed to select a multi-label dataset transformation method in the context of supervised machine learning techniques. We explore the rectangular 2D strip-packing problem (2D-SPP), widely applied in industrial processes to cut sheet metals and paper rolls, where high-quality solutions can be found for more than one improvement heuristic, generating instances with multi-label behavior. To obtain single-label datasets, a total of five multi-label transformation methods are explored. 1000 instances were generated to represent different 2D-SPP variations found in real-world applications, labels for each instance represented by improvement heuristics were calculated, along with 19 predictors provided by problem characteristics. Finally, classification models were fitted to verify the accuracy of each multi-label transformation method. For the 2D-SPP, the single-label obtained using the exclusion method fit more accurate classification models compared to the other four multi-label transformation methods adopted.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Neuenfeldt Júnior Alvaro
Matheus Francescatto
Gabriel Stieler
David Disconzi
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Traditionally the aggregate production plan helps in determining the inventory, production, and work-force, based on the demand forecasts without considering the productivity loss at a tactical level in supply chain planning. In this paper, we include the productivity loss into traditional aggregate production plan and the prescriptive analytics technique, linear programming, is used to solve this problem of practical interest in the domain of multifarious businesses and industries. In this study, we discussed two model variations of the aggregate production planning problem with and without productivity loss, i) fixed work-force, and ii) variable Work Force. The mathematical models were designated to be solved by using an open-source python pulp package in order to evaluate the impacts of the productivity loss on both the models. PuLP is an open-source modeling framework provided by the COIN-OR Foundation (Computational Infrastructure for Operations Research) for linear and integer Programing problems written in Python. The computational results indicate that the productivity loss has direct impact on the workforce hiring and firing.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Hakeem Ur REHMAN
Ayyaz AHMAD
Zarak ALI
Sajjad Ahmad BAIG
Umair MANZOOR

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of this work is to present new reliability characteristics expressed as functions of some variable expressing the measure of effective operation of a machine or a device. These characteristics can be used for both renewable and non-renewable objects. Their mathematical idea reflects the essence of already known characteristics, i.e. it expresses the probability of failure but expressed as a function of a variable, not necessarily identified with time.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Gabriela Kopania
Anna Kuczmaszewska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In mid-1992, Japanese consultant Yamada Hitoshi was tasked with modifying the production systems of Japanese companies as the existing configurations at manufacturing plants no longer satisfied unstable demands. He made improvements to the overall production system by dividing the long assembly lines into several short ones called cells or seru. Although of the advantages, it is still unclear about how to manage this new production system, and what variables really promoted the desired benefits. We identify in total 39 articles from 2004– 2020 about the progress of the seru production system, and we observe some possibilities to improve the effectiveness of this type of the production system. The first is the possibility of manufacturing the product in flexible sequence, in which the operations are independent among them. We show through the developed example that the makespan may be different. We noted when converting the in-line production system to one pure seru, the makespan tend to increase. Nevertheless, when analyzing the effectiveness of serus working concomitantly considering splitting the same lot, makespan and the cost may be reduced. And finally, when converting to one of pure serus, the performance may be similar to that obtained when serus working concomitantly.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yung Chin Shih
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Lean Green is a concept which is implemented as a part of the sustainable development strategy, share allowing for reduction of the company’s costs related to, on the one hand, efficient use of energy factors and on the other optimum use of production factors aimed at minimisation of wastefulness, in particular in the area of post-production waste and pollution. The purpose of the article is to identify the determinants, internal stimuli and to specify the force with which they affect the implementation of the Lean Green concept in companies on various continents: America, Asia and Europe. For the purpose of better recognition of the examined problem, analysis of results of studies was made in consideration of the following criteria: country where a given company operates and share of persons outside the company in the process of implementation of this concept. In article uses the one-way ANOVA methodology, the Shapiro Wilk and Levene tests and the non-parametric Kruskal Wallis test. Hitherto studies have confirmed that the determinants are regional, which indicates the necessity of directional studies.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Nicoletta Baskiewicz
Claudiu Barbu
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Enterprise innovation is currently becoming a recognized factor of the competitiveness, survival, and development of companies in the market economy. Managers still need recommendations on ways of stimulating the growth of innovation in their companies. The objective of this paper is to identify the strategic factors of enterprise innovativeness in the area of technology, defined as the most important internal factors positively impacting the innovativeness of enterprises in a strategic perspective. Empirical studies were conducted using the Computer-Assisted Web Interview (CAWI) method on a purposive sample of N = 180 small and medium-sized innovative industrial processing enterprises in Poland. Data analysis was performed using Exploratory Factor Analysis within the Confirmatory Factor Analysis framework (E-CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Empirical research shows that the strategic factor of enterprise innovativeness in the area of technology is technological activity. A technologically active company should (1) possess a modern machinery stock, (2) conduct systematic technological audits, and (3) maintain close technical cooperation with the suppliers of raw materials, consumables, and intermediates. The implementation of the indicated recommendations by managers should lead to increased innovativeness of small and medium-sized industrial companies. The author recommends the use of the presented research procedure and data analysis methods in further studies.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Danuta Rojek
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Technological progress is the driving force behind industrial development. It is a multidimensional and multi-level phenomenon. In this article we focus on its three manifestations: information and communication technologies (ICT), Industry 4.0 and agile manufacturing. The aim of this article is to analyse the relationship between these constructs as they are undoubtedly interrelated. ICT plays a key role, but it is not a goal itself. They are a prerequisite for the implementation of Industry 4.0, but together with it they serve to achieve agility by the manufacturing system and, as a result, achieve a competitive advantage by companies operating in turbulent and unpredictable environment. The literature findings in this paper are part of a broader study conducted on the impact of ICT on agility of SMEs operating in India. Therefore, we include also subsections showing the level of this relationship in Indian SMEs.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ibrahim Khan Mohammed
Stefan Trzcielinski
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of our research is to gain understanding about material flow related information sharing in the circular economy value network in the form of industrial symbiosis. We need this understanding for facilitating new industrial symbiosis relationships and to support the optimization of operations. Circular economy has been promoted by politics and regulation by EU. In Finland, new circular economy strategy raises the facilitation of industrial symbiosis and data utilization as the key actions to improve sustainability and green growth. Companies stated that the practical problem is to get information on material availability. Digitalization is expected to boost material flows in circular economy by data, but what are the real challenges with circular material flows and what is the willingness of companies to develop co-operation? This paper seeks understanding on how Industry 4.0 is expected to improve the efficiency of waste or by-product flows and what are the expectations of companies. The research question is: How Industry 4.0 technologies and solutions can fix the gaps and discontinuities in the Industrial Symbiosis information flow? This research is conducted as a qualitative case study research with three cases, three types of material and eight companies. Interview data were collected in Finland between January and March 2021. Companies we interviewed mentioned use-cases for sensors and analytics to optimize the material flow but stated the investment cost compared to the value of information. To achieve sustainable circular material flows, the development needs to be done in the bigger picture, for the chain or network of actors, and the motivation and the added value must be found for each of them.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Anne-Mari Järvenpää
Vesa Salminen
Jussi Kantola
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present an exemplary system for recording and analyzing quality costs and to demonstrate that it is helpful in planning and assessing the effectiveness of continuous improvement processes at the operational and strategic level. Various approaches to defining quality costs are described, followed by indicators for assessing effectiveness and tools to collect data on the values of individual groups of quality costs and compare them with financial indicators. The practical part presents a case study on the quality cost accounting system in a medical company and the possibility of using quality cost accounting to plan and evaluate continuous improvement processes and make managerial decisions.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ilona Herzog
Marta Grabowska
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

In digital revolution, the appropriate IT infrastructure, technological knowledge are essential for the success of companies, where the success of the digital transformation depends on digital maturity. The aim of the study is to define the digital maturity, theoretical foundation of the digital maturity model and present a framework for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) understanding where they are in digitalisation (how advanced their digital resource system and digital approach) to respond faster and efficiently to environmental changes. The model construction is based on theory of dynamic capabilities, graduation models, and SMEs management challenges. The model is a dynamic model to support management in strategic, digital and organizational developments, which is divided into IT and organizational dimensions, including 6 components and 28 subcomponents. The ultimate goal of the study is to determine the component weights to create a neurofuzzy model.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Ágnes Sándor
Ákos Gubán

Instructions for authors

REVIEW PROCESS

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors.
Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected.
The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/). The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision. The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision.
All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial system ( https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process.
The material formatted in the MPER format must be unpublished and not under submission elsewhere.

REVIEWERS
Once a year a list of co-operating reviewers is publish in electronic version of MPER. All articles published in MPER are published in open access.


APC
In order to provide free access to readers, and to cover the costs of copyediting, typesetting, long-term archiving, and journal management, an article processing charge (APC) of 800 PLN (about 180 Euro, VAT included) for 10-page article applies to papers accepted after peer review. Each additional page of the article (over 10 pages) costs 80 PLN (about 18 Euro, VAT included).
Maximum length of the article is 18 pages (using MPER template).
There is no submission charge.

Guidelines for Authors

Template for Authors





Additional info

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Publication Ethics Policy

The ethics statements for the journal Management and Production Engineering Review are based on the guidelines of Committee on publication ethics (COPE) and the ELSEVIER publishing ethics resource kit.
For Authors: All articles, published in the journal Management and Production Engineering Review have to comprise a list of references which correspond with the journal’s Instructions to authors for paper preparation. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. All articles are tested using antyplagiarism programme. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable. Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. The corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Authors are accountable for the originality, validity and integrity of the content of their submissions. In choosing to use AI tools, authors are expected to do so responsibly and in accordance with our editorial policies on authorship and principles of publishing ethics. Authorship requires taking accountability for content, consenting to publication via an author publishing agreement, giving contractual assurances about the integrity of the work, among other principles. These are uniquely human responsibilities that cannot be undertaken by AI tools. Therefore, AI tools must not be listed as an author. Authors must, however, acknowledge all sources and contributors included in their work. Where AI tools are used, such use must be acknowledged and documented appropriately.
For Editor-in-Chief: The editor is responsible for decision which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The editor and editorial board and office must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
For Reviewers: Peer review helps the editor in making editorial decisions and also assist the author in improving the paper. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge. Information obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. Other sources: http://apem-journal.org/


Peer-review Procedure

Received manuscripts are first examined by the Management and Production Engineering Review Editors. Manuscripts clearly not suitable for publication, incomplete or not prepared in the required style will be sent back to the authors without scientific review, but may be resubmitted as soon as they have been corrected. The corresponding author will be notified by e-mail when the manuscript is registered at the Editorial Office (marta.grabowska@put.poznan.pl; mper@put.poznan.pl). The ultimate decision to accept, accept subject to correction, or reject a manuscript lies within the prerogative of the Editor-in-Chief and is not subject to appeal. The editors are not obligated to justify their decision. All manuscripts submitted to MPER editorial office (https://www.editorialsystem.com/mper/) will be sent to at least two and in some cases three reviewers for passing the double-blind review process. The responsible editor will make the decision either to send the manuscript to another reviewer to resolve the difference of opinion or return it to the authors for revision.

The average time during which the preliminary assessment of manuscripts is conducted - 14 days
The average time during which the reviews of manuscripts are conducted - 6 months
The average time in which the article is published - 8.4 months

Reviewers

2024
No Name Surname Affiliation
1 Abd El-Rahman Abd El-Raouf Ahmed Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Engineering Research Institute, Giza , Egypr
2 Wiktor Adamus Jagiellonian University, Poland
3 Shoaib Akhtar Fatima Jinnah Women University, Pakistan
4 Mohammad Al-Adaileh "COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Engineering, Technology, and Management Assistant Professor of Instruction, United States"
5 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
6 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
7 Muhammad Asrol Binus University, Indonesia
8 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
9 Haniyah Bilal Haverford university, United States
10 Berihun Bizuneh "Bahir Dar University Bahir Dar Univ, Ethiopian Inst Text & Fash Technol, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia, Ethiopia"
11 Łukasz Brzeziński Katedra Organizacji i Zarządzania, Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki w Poznaniu, Poland
12 Waldemar Budner Katedra Logistyki, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Poznaniu, Poland
13 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
14 Vishnu C R Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, India
15 Fatih Çetin Başkent Üniversitesi, Turkey
16 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
17 Claudiu Cicea Bucharest University of Economic Studies Romania, Romania
18 Hasan Huseyin Coban Department of Electrical Engineering, Bartin University, Turkey
19 Juan Cogollo-Florez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
20 David Coopler Universitat Politècnica de València, Romania
21 Ömer Cora Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey
22 Margareta Coteata Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Romania
23 Szymon Cyfert Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
24 Valentina Di Pasquale Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Salerno, Italy
25 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
26 Luis Edwards Cornell University, United States
27 Joanna Ejdys Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
28 Abdellah El barkany Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University Faculty of Science and Technology of Fez, Morocco
29 Chiara Franciosi CRAN UMR 7039, Université de Lorraine, France
30 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
31 Tetiana Galushkina State Ecological Academy of Postgraduate Education and Management, Ukraine
32 Józef Gawlik Cracow University of Technology, Institut of Production Engineering, Poland
33 Rohollah Ghasemi, College of Management, University of Tehran, Iran
34 Arkadiusz Gola, Lublin University of Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poland
35 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran
36 Magdalena Graczyk-Kucharska, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
37 Adriana Grenčíková Industry 4.0, Human factor, Ergonomic, Slovak Republic
38 Patrik Grznár, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Žilina Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
39 Anouar Hallioui INTI International University, Malaysia
40 Adam Hamrol Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
41 ni luh putu hariastuti itats, Indonesia
42 Paula Heliodoro, Polytechnic Institute of Setubal, Portugal
43 Vitalii Ivanov Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Machines and Tools, Sumy State University, Ukraine
44 Ali Jaboob Dhofar University, Oman
45 Zamberi Jamaludin Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia
46 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland
47 Satishbabu ACE India
48 Prasad Kanaka Institute of Industrial Relations and Human Resource Development, India
49 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
50 Waldemar Karwowski University of Central Florida, United States
51 Osmo Kauppila University of Oulu, Finland
52 Tauno Kekale Merinova Technology Centre, Finland
53 Mahmoud Khedr Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Benha University, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt
54 Peter Kostal Department of Production Systems, Metrology and Asembly, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
55 Boris Kostow University of Angela Kyncheva in Ruse, Bulgaria
56 Martin Krajčovič, University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
57 Caroline  Kristian Uppsala University, Sweden
58 Robert Kucęba Wydział Zarządzania, Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
59 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology
60 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
61 Bhakaporn Kuljirundhorn Foxford University, Canada
62 Rajeev Kumar Doon University, India
63 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
64 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
65 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
66 Wojciech Lewicki West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Poland
67 Tetiana Likhouzova National Technical University of Ukraine, “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Ukraine
68 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
69 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
70 Ildiko Mankova Technical University of Košice, Slovakia
71 Arnaud  Marcelline University of Nantes, France
72 Józef Matuszek University of Bielsko-Biała, Poland
73 Marcin Matuszny Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, ul. Willowa 2, 43-300 Bielsko-Biała
74 Giovanni Mazzuto Università Politecnica Delle Marche, Italy
75 Tomasz Małkus Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
76 Rafał Michalski Katedra Systemów Zarządzania i Rozwoju Organizacji, Politechnika Wrocławska, Poland
77 Jerzy Mikulik AGH University of Krakow, Poland
78 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
79 Norsyahida Mokhtar International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia
80 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
81 Nor Hasrul Akhmal Ngadiman School of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia
82 Duc Duy Nguyen Department of Industrial Systems Engineering, Ho Chi Minh Technology University (HCMUT), Viet Nam
83 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
84 Filscha Nurprihatin Sampoerna University, Indonesia
85 Rebecca Oliver Stockton University, United States
86 Anita Pavlenko Kryvyi Rih State University of Economics and Technology, Ukraine
87 Aleksandar Pesic, MB University, Faculty of Business and Law, Belgrade, Serbia, Serbia
88 Huy Phan Education Technology University, Vietnam, Viet Nam
89 Anna Piekarczyk Poznan School of Logistics (WSL), Poland
90 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
91 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
92 Tengku nur Azila Raja Mamat Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Malaysia
93 Silvijo  Renato University of Rijeka, Croatia
94 Piotr Rogala Department of Quality and Environmental Management, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, Poland
95 Michał Rogalewicz, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
96 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
97 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
98 Mansia Sadyrova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Kazakhstan
99 Nadia Saeed University of the Punjab, Pakistan
100 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
101 Krzysztof Santarek Faculty of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, Poland
102 shankar sehgal Panjab University Chandigarh, India
103 Piotr Senkus University of Warsaw, Poland
104 Jarosław Sęp Politechnika Rzeszowska, Wydział Budowy Maszyn i Lotnictwa, Poland
105 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
106 Dariusz Sobotkiewicz Instytut Nauk o Zarządzaniu i Jakości, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
107 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
108 Klaudia Tomaszewska Faculty of Management Engineering, Bialystok University of Technology, Poland
109 Stefan Trzcielinski Poznan University of Technology, Poland
110 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
111 Somporn Vongpeang Faculty of Technical Education, Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi, Thailand
112 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Faculty of Economics, Czech Republic
113 Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber Poznań University of Technology, Poland
114 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
115 Linda Winters Czech University of Life Sciences, Czech Republic
116 Zbigniew Wisniewski Lodz University of Technology, Poland
117 Piotr Wróblewski Faculty of Engineering, University of Technology and Economics H. Chodkowska in Warsaw, Poland
118 Iseul  Young Hanyang University, Korea (South)
119 Chong Zhan Hubei University, China
120 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland


2025
No. Name Surname Affiliation
1 akshat gaurav akshat Asia University, Taiwan
2 luma Al-kindi University of Technology, Iraq
3 Hind Ali University of Technology, Iraq
4 Katarzyna Antosz Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
5 Gilmar Batalha Universidade de Sao PauloUniv Sao Paulo, Mech Engn Dept, Escola Politecn, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, Brazil
6 Lucia Bednarova Technical University of Kosice, Slovak Republic
7 Anna Burduk Wrocław University of Science and Technology, Poland
8 Danylo Cherevatskyi Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS of Ukraine: Kiev, UA, Ukraine
9 Dorota Czarnecka-Komorowska Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
10 SUGANYA Devi National Institute of Technology,Silchar, India
11 Jacek Diakun Poznan University of Technology, Poland
12 Milan Edl University of West Bohemia, Czech Republic
13 João Furtado Santa Cruz do Sul University, Brazil
14 Bożena Gajdzik "Politechnika Śląska Wydział Inżynierii Materiałowej Katedra Informatyki Przemysłowej, Poland"
15 Mose Gallo Materials and Industrial Production Engineering, University of Napoli Federico, Italy
16 Remigiusz Gawlik Department of Public Management, Krakow University of Economics (KUE), Poland
17 Raja Reddy GNV University of Saskatchewan, Canada
18 Arkadiusz Gola Department of Production Informatisation and Robotisation, Lublin University of Technology,Poland
19 Alireza Goli Department of industrial engineering, Yazd university, Yazd, Iran Iran, Iran
20 Cristian Gómez Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Colombia
21 José-Armando HIDALGO CRESPO ENSAM, Spain
22 Magdalena HRYB Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
23 Katarzyna Hys Opole University of Technology, Poland
24 Izabela Jonek-Kowalska "Wydział Organizacji i Zarządzania Politechnika Śląska, Poland"
25 Amirhossein Karamoozian, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
26 Anna Karwasz Poznan University of Technology, Poland
27 khaoula khlie Liwa college, Morocco
28 Jerzy Kisilowski
29 Peter Kostal, Slovenská Technická Univerzita V Bratislave, Faculty of Material Science and Technology, Slovak Republic
30 Herbert Kotzab Institute for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, University of Bremen, Germany
31 Martin Krajčovič University of Žilina, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
32 Krzysztof Krystosiak Toronto Metropolitan University, Graphic Communications Management, Canada
33 Wiesław Kuczko Poznan University of Technology, Poland
34 Agnieszka Kujawińska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
35 Edyta Kulej-Dudek Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
36 Anup Kumar Inst Management Technol NagpurInst Management Technol Nagpur, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, India
37 Sławomir Kłos Institute of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zielona Góra, Poland
38 Quynh Le Song Thanh Ho Chi Minh Technology University, Viet Nam
39 Yu Lee National Tsing Hua University, Taiwan
40 Stanisław Legutko Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland, Poland
41 Anna Lewandowska-Ciszek Department of Logistics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Poland
42 José Machado University of Minho · School of Engineering, Portugal
43 Damjan Maletič University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Slovenia
44 Marcela Malindzakova Technical University, Slovak Republic
45 Tomasz Malkus Department of Management Process, Cracow University of Economics, Poland
46 Mengistu Manaye, Kombolcha Institute of Technology, Wollo University, Ethiopia, Ethiopia
47 Marcin Matuszny, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Bielsko-Biala, Poland
48 Tomasz Małkus, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie, Katedra Procesu Zarządzania, Poland, Poland
49 Rami Mokao MIS - Management Information Systems, HIAST, Syria
50 Beata Mrugalska Poznan University of Technology, Poland
51 Ig. Jaka Mulyana Industrial Engineering, Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University, Indonesia
52 fernando Nino Polytechnic University of San Luis Potos, Mexico
53 Shimon Nof Purdue University, United States
54 Hana Pacaiová KLI, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Aeronautics, Technical University of Košice, Slovak Republic
55 Arun Kiran Pal Printing Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, India
56 Michal Patak University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
57 Ivan Pavlenko Department of General Mechanics and Machine Dynamics, Sumy State University, Ukraine
58 Miriam Pekarcikova Department of industrial and digital engineering, Technical University of Košice, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Slovak Republic
59 Alin Pop University of Oradea, Romania
60 Praveen Prabhu School of Engineering and Technology, Shivaji University, Kolhapur., India
61 Humiras Purba Industrial Engineering, Associate Professor, Universitas Mercu Buana, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia
62 Paulina Rewers Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznań University of Technology, Poland
63 Michał Rogalewicz Division of Production Engineering, Institute of Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poland
64 Izabela Rojek Institute of Computer Science, Kazimierz Wielki University, Poland
65 David Romero Tecnológico de Monterrey, Mexico
66 Adam Sadowski Katedra Strategii i Zarządzania Wartością Przedsiębiorstwa, Uniwersytet Łódzki, Poland
67 Abdu Salam Abdul Wali Khan Univ MardanAbdul Wali Khan Univ Mardan, Dept Comp Sci, Mardan 23200, Pakistan, Pakistan
68 fernando sampaio KMITL, Brazil
69 Sebastian Saniuk Uniwersytet Zielonogórski, Poland
70 Iman Sharaf "Higher Technological Institute - Egypt Higher Technol Inst, Dept Basic Sci, Cairo, Egypt, Egypt"
71 Robert Sika Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Management, Institute of Materials Technology, Poland
72 Beata Starzyńska Poznan University of Technology
73 Robert Ulewicz Politechnika Częstochowska, Poland
74 Wiesław Urban Politechnika Białostocka, Poland
75 Cang Vo Binh Duong University, Viet Nam
76 Jaroslav Vrchota University of South Bohemia České Budějovice, Czech Republic
77 Ewa Więcek-Janka Wydział Inżynierii Zarządzania, Politechnika Poznańska, Poland
78 Sylwia Łęgowik-Świącik Czestochowa University of Technology Poland, Poland

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more