Applied sciences

Archives of Environmental Protection

Content

Archives of Environmental Protection | 2022 | 48 | 3

Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Waste management faces more and more serious challenges, especially given the growing amount of municipal waste generated in Poland and the resulting environmental impact. One of the significant environmental aspects of waste management is the emission of odorants and odors. Taking into account the odor problem, the majority of municipal waste generated is being collected as mixed waste (62% of municipal waste), which by weight contains approximately 32.7% of kitchen and garden waste. These organic fractions are mainly responsible for the emission of odor and odorants. Those substances can be emitted at every stage: from the waste collection at residential waste bins, through transport, waste storage, and transfer stations, up to various respective treatment facilities, i.e., mechanical-biological waste treatment plants, landfills, or waste incineration plants. The gathered data during the study showed that it is necessary to increase the share of different waste management methods, i.e., recycling, composting, or fermentation processes rather than landfilling to meet all necessary regulations and to fulfill provisions of the waste hierarchy. One of the actions indicated in the legal solutions is expansion, retrofitting, and construction of new sorting plants, anaerobic digestion plants, composting plants, and increase in thermal treatment capacity. Variety of different processes that could emit odors and a diversity of different odor-generating substances released from particular waste management steps should be taken into consideration when building new facilities which are suitable for waste treatment. The overall aim of the work was to characterize and summarize available knowledge about waste management system in Poland and to gather information about odor-generating substances emitted from different waste management steps and facilities, which could be a potential source of information for preparing legal solutions to reduce possible odor nuisance form broadly understood waste management.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Aatamila, M., Verkasalo, P.K., Korhonen, M.J., Viluksela, M.K., Pasanen, K., Tiittanen, P. & Nevalainen, A. (2010). Odor annoyance near waste treatment centers: A population-based study in Finland. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 60, pp. 412–418. DOI:10.3155/1047-3289.60.4.412.
  2. Almarcha, D., Almarcha, M., Nadal, S. & Caixach, J. (2012). Comparison of the depuration efficiency for voc and other odoriferous compounds in conventional and advanced biofilters in the abatement of odour emissions from municipal waste treatment plants. Chem. Eng. Trans., 30, pp. 259–264. DOI:10.3303/CET1230044.
  3. Alwaeli, M. (2015). An overview of municipal solid waste management in Poland. The current situation, problems and challenges. Environ. Prot. Eng., 41, pp. 181–193. DOI:10.5277/epel50414.
  4. Bax, C., Sironi, S. & Capelli, L. (2020). How can odors be measured? An overview of methods and their applications. Atmosphere (Basel)., 11. DOI:10.3390/atmos11010092.
  5. Beylot, A., Hochar, A., Michel, P., Descat, M., Ménard, Y. & Villeneuve, J. (2018). Municipal Solid Waste Incineration in France: An Overview of Air Pollution Control Techniques, Emissions, and Energy Efficiency. J. Ind. Ecol., 22, pp. 1016–1026. DOI:10.1111/jiec.12701.
  6. den Boer, E. Banaszkiewicz, K. & Sebastian M. (2018). Badania ilości i składu odpadów komunalnych w cyklu rocznym pochodzących z terenu gminy Wrocław. Raporty Wydziału Inżynierii Środowiska Politechniki Wrocławskiej. Ser. SPR nr 30, 226 (in Polish).
  7. den Boer, E., Jedrczak, A., Kowalski, Z., Kulczycka, J. & Szpadt, R. (2010). A review of municipal solid waste composition and quantities in Poland. Waste Manag., 30, pp. 369–377. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.09.018.
  8. Brattoli, M., de Gennaro, G., de Pinto, V., Loiotile, A.D., Lovascio, S. & Penza, M. (2011). Odour detection methods: Olfactometry and chemical sensors. Sensors, 11, pp. 5290–5322. DOI:10.3390/s110505290.
  9. Bruno, P., Caselli, M., de Gennaro, G., Solito, M. & Tutino, M. (2007). Monitoring of odor compounds produced by solid waste treatment plants with diffusive samplers. Waste Manag., 27, pp. 539–544. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.006.
  10. Burnley, S.J. (2007). A review of municipal solid waste composition in the United Kingdom. Waste Manag., 27, pp. 1274–1285. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2006.06.018.
  11. Butrymowicz T. (2018). Badania odpadów w Jarocinie. Centralne Laboratorium Instytutu Inżynierii Środowiska, Uniwersytet Zielonogórski., unpublished (in Polish).
  12. Cangialosi, F., Intini, G., Liberti, L., Notarnicola, M. & Stellacci, P. (2008). Health risk assessment of air emissions from a municipal solid waste incineration plant - A case study. Waste Manag., 28, pp. 885–895. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.05.006.
  13. Capelli, L. & Sironi, S. (2018). Combination of field inspection and dispersion modelling to estimate odour emissions from an Italian landfill. Atmos. Environ., 191, pp. 273–290. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.007.
  14. Capelli, L., Sironi, S. & del Rosso, R. (2013a). Odor sampling: Techniques and strategies for the estimation of odor emission rates from different source types. Sensors, 13, pp. 938–955. DOI:10.3390/s130100938.
  15. Capelli, L., Sironi, S., Del Rosso, R. & Guillot, J.M. (2013b). Measuring odours in the environment vs. dispersion modelling: A review. Atmos. Environ., 79, pp. 731–743. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.07.029.
  16. Chang, H., Tan, H., Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Li, Y., Lu, W. & Wang, H. (2019). Statistical correlations on the emissions of volatile odorous compounds from the transfer stage of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag., 87, pp. 701–708. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.014.
  17. Chen, Y.C. (2018). Effects of urbanization on municipal solid waste composition. Waste Manag., 79, pp. 828–836. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.017.
  18. Cheng, Z., Zhu, S., Chen, X., Wang, L., Lou, Z. & Feng, L. (2020). Variations and environmental impacts of odor emissions along the waste stream. J. Hazard. Mater., 384, 120912. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120912.
  19. Cheng, Z., Sun, Z., Zhu, S., Lou, Z., Zhu, N. & Feng, L. (2019). The identification and health risk assessment of odor emissions from waste landfilling and composting. Sci. Total Environ., 649, pp. 1038–1044. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.230.
  20. Colón, J., Alvarez, C., Vinot, M., Lafuente, F.J., Ponsá, S., Sánchez, A. & Gabriel, D. (2017). Characterization of odorous compounds and odor load in indoor air of modern complex MBT facilities. Chem. Eng. J., 313, pp. 1311–1319. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2016.11.026.
  21. Conti, C., Guarino, M. & Bacenetti, J. (2020). Measurements techniques and models to assess odor annoyance: A review. Environ. Int., 134, 105261. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105261.
  22. Curren, J., Hallis, S.A., Snyder, C. (Cher) L. & Suffet, I. (Mel) H. (2016). Identification and quantification of nuisance odors at a trash transfer station. Waste Manag., 58, pp. 52–61. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.021.
  23. Çetin Doğruparmak, Ş., Pekey, H. & Arslanbaş, D. (2018). Odor dispersion modeling with CALPUFF: Case study of a waste and residue treatment incineration and utilization plant in Kocaeli, Turkey. Environ. Forensics, 19, pp. 79–86. DOI:10.1080/15275922.2017.1408160.
  24. Damgaard, A., Riber, C., Fruergaard, T., Hulgaard, T. & Christensen, T.H. (2010) Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. Waste Manag., 30, pp. 1244–1250. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.025.
  25. Defoer, N., De Bo, I., Van Langenhove, H., Dewulf, J. & Van Elst, T. (2002) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry as a tool for estimating odour concentrations of biofilter effluents at aerobic composting and rendering plants. J. Chromatogr. A, 970, pp. 259–273. DOI:10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00654-4.
  26. Di Foggia, G., Beccarello, M. (2021) Market structure of urban waste treatment and disposal: Empirical evidence from the italian industry. Sustain., 13. DOI:10.3390/su13137412.
  27. Di, Y., Liu, J., Liu, J., Liu, S. & Yan, L. (2013). Characteristic analysis for odor gas emitted from food waste anaerobic fermentation in the pretreatment workshop. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 63, pp. 1173–1181. DOI:10.1080/10962247.2013.807318.
  28. Directive 2008/98/EC of The European Parliment and of The Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives.
  29. Duan, Z., Scheutz, C. & Kjeldsen, P. (2021). Trace gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills: A review. Waste Manag., 119, pp. 39–62. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.015.
  30. European Comission Eurostat Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/main/data/database.
  31. European Union Council Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill, 1999.
  32. European Union Directive 2018/851 amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste.
  33. Fang, J.J., Yang, N., Cen, D.Y., Shao, L.M. & He, P.J. (2012). Odor compounds from different sources of landfill: Characterization and source identification. Waste Manag., 32, pp. 1401–1410. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.013.
  34. Fang, J., Zhang, H., Yang, N., Shao, L. & He, P. (2013). Gaseous pollutants emitted from a mechanical biological treatment plant for municipal solid waste: Odor assessment and photochemical reactivity. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 63, pp. 1287–1297. DOI:10.1080/10962247.2013.822439.
  35. Fei, F., Wen, Z., Huang, S. & De Clercq, D. (2018). Mechanical biological treatment of municipal solid waste: Energy efficiency, environmental impact and economic feasibility analysis. J. Clean. Prod., 178, pp. 731–739. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.060.
  36. Forastiere, F., Badaloni, C., De Hoogh, K., Von Kraus, M.K., Martuzzi, M., Mitis, F., Palkovicova, L., Porta, D., Preiss, P. & Ranzi, A. (2011). Health impact assessment of waste management facilities in three European countries. Environ. Heal. A Glob. Access Sci. Source, 10, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.1186/1476-069X-10-53.
  37. Giusti, L. (2009). A review of waste management practices and their impact on human health. Waste Manag., 29, pp. 2227–2239. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.028.
  38. Guo, H., Duan, Z., Zhao, Y., Liu, Y., Mustafa, M.F., Lu, W. & Wang, H. (2017). Characteristics of volatile compound emission and odor pollution from municipal solid waste treating/disposal facilities of a city in Eastern China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24, pp. 18383–18391. DOI:10.1007/s11356-017-9376-8.
  39. He, P., Du, W., Xu, X., Zhang, H., Shao, L. & Lü, F. (2020). Effect of biochemical composition on odor emission potential of biowaste during aerobic biodegradation. Sci. Total Environ., 727, 138285. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138285.
  40. Heyer, K.U., Hupe, K. & Stegmann, R. (2013). Methane emissions from MBT landfills. Waste Manag., 33, pp. 1853–1860. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.012.
  41. Hou, J.Q., Li, M.X., Wei, Z.M., Xi, B.D., Jia, X., Zhu, C.W. & Liu, D.M. (2013). Critical components of odors and VOCs in mechanical biological treatment process of MSW. Adv. Mater. Res., 647, pp. 438–449. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.647.438.
  42. Iakovou, E., Karagiannidis, A., Vlachos, D., Toka, A. & Malamakis, A. (2010). Waste biomass-to-energy supply chain management: A critical synthesis. Waste Manag., 30, pp. 1860–1870. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.02.030.
  43. Internet source, website accessed on 15.07.2021, available online https://www.portalsamorzadowy.pl/gospodarka-komunalna/spalarnie-w-polsce-gdzie-dzialaja-kto-buduje-a-kto-ma-je-w-planie,253488.html.
  44. Jędrczak, A., den Boer, E., Kamińska-Boerak, J., Kozłowska B., Szpadt, R., Mierzwiński A., Krzyśków, A. & Kundegórski, M. (2020). Analysis of waste management costs - assessment of investment needs in the country in the field of waste prevention and waste management in connection with the new EU financial perspective 2021-2027, IOŚ-PIB, NFOŚiGW, Warszawa (in Polish) (unpublished report). Available online: https://odpady.net.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021
  45. Jędrczak, A., den Boer, E., Kamińska-Borak, J., Szpadt, R., Krzyśków, A. & Wielgosiński, G. (2021). Analysis of the possibilities and barriers to the management of plastic waste from separate collection of municipal waste, and the issues of circular economy, IOŚ-PIB, NFOŚiGW, Warszawa (in Polish) (unpublished report). Available online: https://ios.edu.pl/aktualnosci/analiza-mozliwosci-i-barier-zagospodarowania-odpadow-z-tworzyw-sztucznych-a-goz/
  46. Jiang, J., Wang, F., Wang, J. & Li, J. (2021). Ammonia and hydrogen sulphide odour emissions from different areas of a landfill in Hangzhou, China. Waste Manag. Res., 39, pp. 360–367. DOI:10.1177/0734242X20960225.
  47. Jońca, J., Pawnuk, M., Arsen, A. & Sówka, I. (2022) Electronic Noses and Their Applications for Sensory and Analytical Measurements in the Waste Management Plants—A Review. Sensors, 22, 1510. https://DOI:10.3390/s22041510
  48. Ko, J.H., Xu, Q. & Jang, Y.C. (2015). Emissions and Control of Hydrogen Sulfide at Landfills: A Review. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, pp. 2043–2083. DOI:10.1080/10643389.2015.1010427.
  49. Kulig, A. & Szylak-Szydlowski, M. (2016). Assessment of range of olfactory impact of plant to mechanical-biological treatment of municipal waste. Chem. Eng. Trans., 54, pp. 247–252. DOI:10.3303/CET1654042.
  50. Le Bihan, Y., Loranger-King, D., Turgeon, N., Pouliot, N., Moreau, N., Deschênes, D. & Rivard, G. (2020). Use of alternative cover materials to control surface emissions (H2s and vocs) at an engineered landfill. Detritus, 10, pp. 118–126. DOI:10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13909.
  51. Liu, Y., Lu, W., Wang, H., Gao, X. & Huang, Q. (2019). Improved impact assessment of odorous compounds from landfills using Monte Carlo simulation. Sci. Total Environ., 648, pp. 805–810. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.213.
  52. Liu, Y., Yang, H. & Lu, W. (2020). VOCs released from municipal solid waste at the initial decomposition stage: Emission characteristics and an odor impact assessment. J. Environ. Sci. (China), 98, pp. 143–150. DOI:10.1016/j.jes.2020.05.009.
  53. Long, Y., Zhang, S., Fang, Y., Du, Y., Liu, W., Fang, C. & Shen, D. (2017). Dimethyl sulfide emission behavior from landfill site with air and water control. Biodegradation, 28, pp. 327–335. DOI:10.1007/s10532-017-9799-4.
  54. Lou, Z., Wang, M., Zhao, Y. & Huang, R. (2015). The contribution of biowaste disposal to odor emission from landfills. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 65, pp. 479–484. DOI:10.1080/10962247.2014.1002870.
  55. Lucernoni, F., Tapparo, F., Capelli, L. & Sironi, S. (2016). Evaluation of an Odour Emission Factor (OEF) to estimate odour emissions from landfill surfaces. Atmos. Environ., 144, pp. 87–99. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.064.
  56. Maurer, D.L., Bragdon, A.M., Short, B.C., Ahn, H. & Koziel, J.A. (2018). Improving environmental odor measurements: Comparison of lab-based standard method and portable odor measurement technology. Arch. Environ. Prot., 44, pp. 100–107. DOI:10.24425/119699.
  57. Meišutovič-Akhtarieva, M. & Marčiulaitienė, E. (2017). Research on odours emitted from non-hazardous waste landfill using dynamic olfactometry. 10th Int. Conf. Environ. Eng. ICEE 2017, pp. 27–28. DOI:10.3846/enviro.2017.034.
  58. Monzambe, G.M., Mpofu, K. & Daniyan, I.A. (2021). Optimal location of landfills and transfer stations for municipal solid waste in developing countries using non-linear programming. Sustain. Futur., 3, 100046. DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2021.100046.
  59. Mustafa, M.F., Liu, Y., Duan, Z., Guo, H., Xu, S., Wang, H. & Lu, W. (2017). Volatile compounds emission and health risk assessment during composting of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. J. Hazard. Mater., 327, pp. 35–43. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.046.
  60. Naddeo, V., Zarra, T., Oliva, G., Chiavola, A., Vivarelli, A. & Cardona, G. (2018). Odour impact assessment of a large municipal solid waste landfill under different working phases. Glob. Nest J., 20, pp. 654–658. DOI:10.30955/gnj.002770.
  61. Oleniacz, R. (2014). Impact of the municipal solid waste incineration plant in Warsaw on air quality. Geomatics Environ. Eng., 8, 25. DOI:10.7494/geom.2014.8.4.25.
  62. Palmiotto, M., Fattore, E., Paiano, V., Celeste, G., Colombo, A. & Davoli, E. (2014). Influence of a municipal solid waste landfill in the surrounding environment: Toxicological risk and odor nuisance effects. Environ. Int., 68, pp. 16–24. DOI:10.1016/j.envint.2014.03.004.
  63. Pawnuk, M., Grzelka, A., Miller, U. & Sówka, I. (2020). Prevention and reduction of odour nuisance in waste management in the context of the current legal and technological solutions. J. Ecol. Eng., 21, pp. 34–41. DOI:10.12911/22998993/125455.
  64. Polish Committee for Standardization. Polish Standard PN-EN 13725:2007: Air Quality—Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry, Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2007.
  65. Ragazzi, M., Tosi, P., Rada, E.C., Torretta, V. & Schiavon, M. (2014). Effluents from MBT plants: Plasma techniques for the treatment of VOCs. Waste Manag., 34, pp. 2400–2406. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.026.
  66. Sánchez-Monedero, M.A., Fernández-Hernández, A., Higashikawa, F.S. & Cayuela, M.L. (2018). Relationships between emitted volatile organic compounds and their concentration in the pile during municipal solid waste composting. Waste Manag., 79, pp. 179–187. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.07.041.
  67. Scaglia, B., Orzi, V., Artola, A., Font, X., Davoli, E., Sanchez, A. & Adani, F. (2011). Odours and volatile organic compounds emitted from municipal solid waste at different stage of decomposition and relationship with biological stability. Bioresour. Technol., 102, pp. 4638–4645. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.01.016.
  68. Schiavon, M., Martini, L.M., Corrà, C., Scapinello, M., Coller, G., Tosi, P. & Ragazzi, M. (2017). Characterisation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by the composting of different waste matrices. Environ. Pollut., 231, pp. 845–853. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.096.
  69. Schlegelmilch, M., Streese, J. & Stegmann, R. (2005). Odour management and treatment technologies: An overview. Waste Manag., 25, pp. 928–939. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.07.006.
  70. Shi, X., Zheng, G., Shao, Z. & Gao, D. (2020). Effect of source-classified and mixed collection from residential household waste bins on the emission characteristics of volatile organic compounds. Sci. Total Environ., 707, 135478. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135478.
  71. Sironi, S., Capelli, L., Céntola, P. & Del Rosso, R. (2007). Odour emissions from MSW composting process steps. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag., 7, pp. 304–316. DOI:10.1504/IJETM.2007.015148.
  72. Sironi, S., Capelli, L., Céntola, P., Del Rosso, R. & Il Grande, M. (2006). Odour emission factors for the prediction of odour emissions from plants for the mechanical and biological treatment of MSW. Atmos. Environ., 40, pp. 7632–7643. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.052.
  73. Sonibare, O.O., Adeniran, J.A. & Bello, I.S. (2019). Landfill air and odour emissions from an integrated waste management facility. J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng., 17, pp. 13–28. DOI:10.1007/s40201-018-00322-1.
  74. Statistic Poland Environment 2020. Stat. Anal. 2020, pp. 154–161.
  75. Statistic Poland Local Data Bank (2021) Available online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/podgrup/temat.
  76. Szulczyński, B., Wasilewski, T., Wojnowski, W., Majchrzak, T., Dymerski, T., Namiésnik, J. & Gębicki, J. (2017). Different ways to apply a measurement instrument of E-nose type to evaluate ambient air quality with respect to odour nuisance in a vicinity of municipal processing plants. Sensors (Switzerland), 17. DOI:10.3390/s17112671.
  77. Tan, H., Zhao, Y., Ling, Y., Wang, Y. & Wang, X. (2017). Emission characteristics and variation of volatile odorous compounds in the initial decomposition stage of municipal solid waste. Waste Manag., 68, pp. 677–687. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.015.
  78. Tagliaferri, F., Invernizzi, M., Sironi, S. & Capelli, L. (2020). Influence of modelling choices on the results of landfill odour dispersion. Detritus, 12, pp. 92–99. DOI:10.31025/2611-4135/2020.13998.
  79. The Act of 14 December 2012 on waste (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 797) (in Polish).
  80. Tyrała K. (2019. Conducting research on the quantity and morphological composition of municipal waste in Bydgoszcz. Final report. Collective analysis of the entire study, R.O.T. RECYCLING ODPADY TECHNOLOGIE S.C. K, Gliwice, (in Polish).
  81. VDI 3882 PART 1 Olfactometry, determination of odour intensity, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Germany, 1992.
  82. VDI 3880: Olfactometry. Static Sampling, Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Germany, 2011.
  83. Wang, Y., Li, L., Qiu, Z., Yang, K., Han, Y., Chai, F., Li, P. & Wang, Y. (2021). Trace volatile compounds in the air of domestic waste landfill site: Identification, olfactory effect and cancer risk. Chemosphere, 272, 129582. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129582.
  84. Wiśniewska, M. (2020a). Analysis of Potential Exposure to Components of Municipal Solid Waste in a Mechanical Biological Treatment. Proceedings, 51, 10. DOI:10.3390/proceedings2020051010.
  85. Wiśniewska, M. (2020b) Methods of assessing odour emissions from biogas plants processing municipal waste. J. Ecol. Eng., 21, pp. 140–147. DOI:10.12911/22998993/113039.
  86. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A. & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2021). The use of chemical sensors to monitor odour emissions at municipal waste biogas plants. Appl. Sci., 11. DOI:10.3390/app11093916.
  87. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A. & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2020a). Odour emissions of municipal waste biogas plants-impact of technological factors, air temperature and humidity. Appl. Sci., 10. DOI:10.3390/app10031093.
  88. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A. & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2020b). Olfactometric testing as a method for assessing odour nuisance of biogas plants processing municipal waste. Arch. Environ. Prot., 46, pp. 60–68. DOI:10.24425/aep.2020.134536.
  89. Wiśniewska, M., Kulig, A. & Lelicińska-Serafin, K. (2019). Comparative analysis of preliminary identification and characteristic of odour sources in biogas plants processing municipal waste in Poland. SN Appl. Sci., 1, pp. 1–10. DOI:10.1007/s42452-019-0534-0.
  90. Wiśniewska, M. & Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. (2021). The air and sewage pollutants from biological waste treatment. Processes, 9, pp. 1–13. DOI:10.3390/pr9020250.
  91. Wu, C., Shu, M., Liu, X., Sang, Y., Cai, H., Qu, C. & Liu, J. (2020). Characterization of the volatile compounds emitted from municipal solid waste and identification of the key volatile pollutants. Waste Manag., 103, pp. 314–322. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.043.
  92. Xu, A., Chang, H., Zhao, Y., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Lu, W. & Wang, H. (2020). Dispersion simulation of odorous compounds from waste collection vehicles: Mobile point source simulation with ModOdor. Sci. Total Environ., 711, 135109. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135109.
  93. Yao, X.Z., Ma, R.C., Li, H.J., Wang, C., Zhang, C., Yin, S.S., Wu, D., He, X.Y., Wang, J. & Zhan, L.T. (2019). Assessment of the major odor contributors and health risks of volatile compounds in three disposal technologies for municipal solid waste. Waste Manag., 91, pp. 128–138. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.009.
  94. Zemanek, J., Wozniak, A. & Malinowski, M. (2011). The role and place of solid waste transfer station in the waste management system. Polish Acad. Sci. Cracow Branch 2011, 11, pp. 5–13.
  95. Zhang, Y., Ning, X., Li, Y., Wang, J., Cui, H., Meng, J., Teng, C., Wang, G. & Shang, X. (2021). Impact assessment of odor nuisance, health risk and variation originating from the landfill surface. Waste Manag., 126, pp. 771–780. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.055.
  96. Zhang, H., Schuchardt, F., Li, G., Yang, J. & Yang, Q. (2013). Emission of volatile sulfur compounds during composting of municipal solid waste (MSW). Waste Manag., 33, pp. 957–963. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.11.008.
  97. Zhao, Y., Lu, W. & Wang, H. (2015). Volatile trace compounds released from municipal solid waste at the transfer stage: Evaluation of environmental impacts and odour pollution. J. Hazard. Mater., 300, pp. 695–701. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.081.
  98. Zielnica J. & Cudakiewicz P. (2016). Morphological studies of municipal waste generated in the Szczecin City Commune 2015-2016, SWECO (in Polish).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Marcin Pawnuk
1
ORCID: ORCID
Bartosz Szulczyński
2
ORCID: ORCID
Emilia den Boer
1
ORCID: ORCID
Izabela Sówka
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Environment Protection Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland
  2. Department of Process Engineering and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Gdańsk University of Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Sewage sludge from municipal wastewater treatment plants is currently a serious environmental problem, given its diversity due to the variability of time and heavy metal content. Current research on the monitoring of heavy metals is based on the determination of Pb, Cd, Hg, Ni, Zn, Cu and Cr. This makes any thallium content data difficult to access. The study estimated the degree of contamination of sewage sludge with thallium. The sludge samples came from a sewage treatment plant located in Poland. The results are presented for the total concentration of thallium and its mobile forms. These samples were analyzed by differential pulse voltammetry. The results showed that the average thallium content was 0.203 μg/g and its mobile form was 0.025 μg/g. The conducted research shows that almost 13% of thallium from sewage sludge can be gradually released into the environment.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Ahumada, I., Escudero, P., Ascar, L., Mendoza, J.& Richter, P. (2004). Extractability of Arsenic, Copper, and Lead in Soils of a Mining and Agricultural Zone in Central Chile. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 35, pp. 1615-1634. DOI:10.1081/CSS-120038558
  2. Alvarez-Ayuso, E., Otones, V., Murciego, A., Garcia-Sanchez, A. & Santa Regina, I. (2013). Zinc, cadmium and thallium distribution in soils and plants of area impacted by sphalerite-bearing mine wastes. Geoderma, 207-208, pp. 25-34. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.04.033
  3. Council Directive of 21.III.1991 concerning urban wastewater treatment. 91/271/EEC.
  4. De La Rochebrochard, S., Naffrechoux, E., Drogui, P., Mercier, G. & Blais, J. (2013). Low frequencyultrasound-assisted leaching of sewage sludge for toxic metal removal, dewatering and fertilizingproperties preservation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 20, pp. 109-117. DOI:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2012.08.001
  5. Dmowski, K., Kozakiewicz, A. & Kozakiewicz, M. (2002). Bioindication thallium search in southern Poland. Kosmos, 51(2), pp. 151–163. (in Polish)
  6. Finkelman, R. (1999). Trace elements in coal. Environmental and health significance. Biological Trace Element Research, 67(3), pp. 197–204. DOI:10.1007/BF02784420 .
  7. Frankowski, M., Zioła-Frankowska A., Kowalski, A. & Siepak., J. (2010). Fractionation of heavy metals in bottom sediments using Tessier procedure. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60, pp. 1165-1178. DOI:10.1007/s12665-009-0258-3
  8. Fytili, D. & Zabaniotou, A. (2008). Utilization of sewage sludge in EU application of old and new methods a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12 (1), pp. 116-140. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2006.05.014
  9. Galván–Arzate, S. & Santamaria, A. (1998). Thallium toxicity. Toxicology Letters, 99(1), pp. 1–13. DOI:10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00126-x
  10. Ibragimow, A., Głosińska., G., Siepak, M. & Walna, B. (2010). Heavy metals in fluvial sediments of the Odra river flood plains-introductory research. Quaestiones geographicae, 29, pp. 37-47. DOI:10.2478/v10117-010-0004-7
  11. Kowalik, R,, Gawdzik, J., Gawdzik. B. & Gawdzik, A. (2020). Analysis of the mobility of heavy metals in sludge for the sewage treatment plant in Daleszyce. Structure and Environment, 12, 85 DOI: 10.30540/sae-2020-010
  12. Larner, B., Seen, A. & Townsend, A. (2006). Comparative study of optimized BCR sequential extraction scheme and acid leaching of elements in the certified reference material NIST 2711. Analytica Chimica Acta, 556, pp. 444-449. DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2005.09.058
  13. Łukaszewski, Z., Jakubowska, M., Zembrzuski, W., Karbowska, B. & Pasieczna,A. (2010). Flow – injection differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry as a tool for thallium monitoring in the environment. Electroanalysis, 22 (17-18), pp. 1963-1966. DOI:10.1002/elan.201000151
  14. Lukaszewski, Z., Karbowska, B., Zembrzuski, W. & Siepak, M. (2012). Thallium in fractions of sediments formed during the 2004 tsunami in Thailand. Ecotoxicology and Environmwntal Safety, 80, pp. 184-189. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.02.026
  15. Madrid, F., Reinoso, R., Florido, M., Barrientos, E., Ajmone - Marsan, F., Davidson, C. & Madrid, L. (2007). Estimating the extractability of potentially toxic metals in urban soils: A comparison of several extracting solutions. Environmental Pollution, 147, pp. 713-722. DOI:10.1016%2Fj.envpol.2006.09.005
  16. Merrington, G., Oliver, I., Smernik., R. & McLaughlin, M. (2003). The influence of sewage sludge properties on sludge-borne metal availability. Advances in Environmental Research, 8, pp.21-36. DOI:10.1016/S1093-0191(02)00139-9
  17. Pathak, A., Dastidar, M. & Sreekrishnan, T. (2009). Bioleaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, pp. 2343-2353. DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.11.005
  18. Querol, X., Fernandez-Turiel, J. & Lopez-Soler, A. (1995). Trace elements in coal and their behaviour during combustion in a large power station. Fuel, 74(3), pp. 331–343. DOI:10.1016/0016-2361(95)93464-O
  19. Quevauviller, Ph. (2002). SM&T activities in support of standardization of operationally defined extraction procedures for soil and sediment analysesd, [In] Ph. Quevauviller (ed.), Methodologies in soil and sediment fractionation studies. Single and sequential extraction procedures, European Commission, DG Research, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 1–9.
  20. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment (Rozporządzenie Ministra Środowiska z dnia 6 lutego 2015 r. w sprawie komunalnych osadów ściekowych. Dz.U. 2015 poz. 257)
  21. Regulation of the Minister of the Environment dated. 1.8.2002r. on municipal sewage sludge, Acts. Laws No. 134, item 1140.
  22. Resolution of the Council of Ministers of Polish Government No 233, 29.12.2006.
  23. Smith, K., Fowler, G., Pullket, S. & Graham, N. (2009). Sewage sludge-based adsorbents: A review of their production, properties and use in water treatment applications. Water Research, 43, pp. 2569-2594. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2009.02.038.
  24. Svancara, I., Ostapczuk, P., Arunchalam, J., Emons, H.E. & Vytras, K. (1997). Determination of thallium in environmental samples using potentiometric stripping analysis. Method development, Electroanalysis, 9(1), pp. 26-31. DOI:10.1002/elan.1140090108
  25. Szarek, Ł. (2020). Leaching of heavy metals from thermal treatment municipal sewage sludge fly ashes. Archives of Environmental Protection, 46(3), pp. 49–59. DOI:10.24425/aep.2020.134535
  26. Vanek, A., Chrastny, V., Komarek, M., Penizek, V., Teper, L., Cabala, J. & Drabek, O. (2013). Geochemical position of thallium in soils from a smelter-impacted area. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 124, pp. 176-182. DOI:org/10.1016%2Fj.gexplo.2012.09.002
  27. Vanek, A., Komarek, M., Vokurkova, P., Mihaljevic, M., Sebek, O., Panuskova, G., Chrastny, V. & Drabek, O. (2011). Effect of illite and birnessite on thallium retention and bioavailability in contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 191, pp. 170-176. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.065
  28. Viraraghavan, T. & Srinivasan, A. (2011). Thallium: Environmental Pollution and Health Effects, Encyclopedia of Environmental Health, pp. 325-333. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-52272-6.00643-7
  29. Woźniak, M., Żygadło, M. & Latońska, J. (2004). Assessing the Chemical Stability of Sewage Sludges Deposited Landfills under Natural Conditions. Ochrona Środowiska, 26, pp. 25-31.
  30. Xiao, T., Guha, J., Boyle, D., Liu, C. & Chen, J.(2004). Environmental concerns related to high thallium levels in soils and thallium uptake by plants in southwest Guizhou, China. Science of The Total Environment, 318(1-3), pp. 223-244. DOI:10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00448-0
  31. Zitko, V. (1975). Toxicity and pollution potential of thallium, The Science of the Total Environment, 4, pp. 185-192. DOI:10.1016/0048-9697(75)90039-X
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Bożena Karbowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Włodzimierz Zembrzuski
1
ORCID: ORCID
Joanna Zembrzuska
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Poznan University of Technology, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Rain gardens are one of the best measures for rainfall runoff and pollutant abatement in sponge city construction. The rain garden system was designed and developed for the problem of severely impeded urban water circulation. The rain gardens monitored the rainfall runoff abatement and pollutant removal capacity for 46 sessions from January 2018 to December 2019. Based on these data, the impact of rain gardens on runoff abatement rate and pollutant removal rate was studied. The results obtained indicated that the rain garden on the runoff abatement rate reached 82.5%, except with extreme rainfall, all fields of rainfall can be effectively abated. The removal rate of suspended solid particles was the highest, followed by total nitrogen and total phosphorus, the total removal rate in 66.35% above. The rain garden is still in the “youth stage”, and all aspects of the operation effect are good.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Boogaard, F. C. , Van, D. V. F. , Langeveld, J. G. , Kluck, J. & Van, D. G. N. (2015). Re-moval efficiency of storm water treatment techniques: standardized full scale laborato-ry testing. Urban Water Journal, 14(3-4):pp. 255-262. DOI:10.1080/1573062X.2015.1092562
  2. Chahal, M. K. , Shi, Z. & Flury, M. (2016). Nutrient leaching and copper speciation in compost-amended bioretention systems. Science of the Total Environment, 556, pp. 302-309. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.125
  3. Davis, A. P. , Traver, R. G. , Hunt, W. F. , Lee, R. , Brown, R. A. & Olszewski, J. M. (2012). Hydrologic Performance of Bioretention Storm-Water Control Measures. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 17(5), pp. 604-614. DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)HE .1943-5584.0000467
  4. Gao, Z. , Zhang, Q, H. , Xie, Y. D. , Wang, Q. , Dzakpasu, M. , Xiong, J. Q. & Wang, X. C.(2022). A novel multi-objective optimization framework for urban green-gray infrastructure implementation under impacts of climate change. Science of The Total Environment, 825: pp. 153954. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153954
  5. Ghosh, S. P. & Maiti, S. K. (2018). Evaluation of heavy metal contamination in roadside deposited sediments and road surface runoff: a case study. Environmental Earth Sciences, 77(7):267. DOI:10.1007/s12665-018-7370-1
  6. Guo, C. , Li, J. , Li, H. , Zhang, B. , Ma, M. & Li, F.(2018). Seven-Year Running Effect Evaluation and Fate Analysis of Rain Gardens in Xi’an, Northwest China. Water, 10(7). DOI:10.3390/w10070944
  7. Guo, C. , Li, J. K. , Ma, Y. , Li, H, E. , Yuan, M. & Ji, G. Q.(2015). Operation life analysis and value estimation of rainwater garden. Journal of Environmental Science, 38(11), pp. 4391-4399(in Chinese).
  8. Gupta, A. , Thengane, S. K. & Mahajani, S. (2018). CO2 gasification of char from lignocellulosic garden waste: Experimental and kinetic study. Bioresource Technology, 263, pp. 180-191. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.04.097
  9. Hess, A. , Wadzuk, B. &Welker, A. (2021). Evapotranspiration estimation in rain gardens using soil moisture sensors. Vadose Zone Journal. DOI:10.1002/vzj2.20100
  10. Hong, J. , Geronimo, F. K. , Choi, H. &, Kim, L. H. (2018). Impacts of nonpoint source pollutants on microbial community in rain gardens. Chemosphere, 209, pp. 20-27. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.062
  11. Hsieh, C. & Davis, A. P. (2005). Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(11), pp. 1521-1531. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2005)131:11(1521)
  12. Jeong, H., Choi, J.Y., Lee, J., Lim, J. & Ra, R. (2020). Heavy metal pollution by road-deposited sediments and its contribution to total suspended solids in rainfall runoff from intensive industrial areas. Environmental Pollution, 265:15028. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115028
  13. Jiang, C. B., Li, J. K., Ma, Y., Li, H. E. & Ruan,T. S. (2012). The Regulating Effect of Rain Garden on Actual Rainfall Runoff. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 032(004), pp. 122-127(in Chinese).
  14. Kim, L. H. (2021). Stormwater runoff treatment using rain garden: performance monitoring and development of deep learning-based water quality prediction models. Water, 13(24), 3488. DOI:10.3390/w13243488
  15. Li, L. & Davis, A. P. (2014). Urban stormwater runoff nitrogen composition and fate in bioretention systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(6):3403. DOI: 10.1021/es4055302
  16. Ming-Han Li , Mark Swapp , Myung Hee Kim , Kung-Hui Chu , Chan Yong Sung (2014). Comparing bioretention designs with and without an internal water storage layer for treating highway runoff. Water Environment Research, 86(5), pp. 387-397. DOI: 10.2175/106143013X13789303501920
  17. Li, N. , Meng, Y. , Wang, J. ,Yu, Q. & Zhang, N. Q. (2008). Research on waterlogging reduction Effect of low-impact development measures -- A Case study of ji nan sponge test Area. Journal of Water Resources, 49(12), pp. 1489-1502(in Chinese).
  18. Luo, H. M., Che, W. , Li, J. Q. , Wang, H. L. , Meng, G. H. & He, J. P.(2008). Application of rainwater garden in flood control and utilization. China Water supply and Drainage, 24(06), pp. 48-52(in Chinese).
  19. Cheng, M. , Qin, H. P. , He, K. M. & Xu, H. L. (2018). Can floor-area-ratio incentive promote low impact development in a highly urbanized area? -A case study in Changzhou City, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 12(2), pp. 1-8.
  20. Morales, V. L. , Gao, B. & Steenhuis, T. S. (2009). Grain Surface-Roughness Effects on Colloidal Retention in the Vadose Zone. Vadose Zone Journal, 8(1), pp. 11-20. DOI:10.2136/vzj2007.0171
  21. Palmer, E. T. , Poor, C. J. , Hinman, C. & Stark, J. D.(2013). Nitrate and Phosphate Removal through Enhanced Bioretention Media: Mesocosm Study. Water Environment Research, 85(9), pp. 823-832. DOI: 10.2175/106143013X13736496908997
  22. Sun, Y. , Wei, X. & Pomeroy, C. A. (2011). Research Status and Prospect of storm and flood resource regulation measures for low-impact Development. Progress in water science, 22(02), pp. 287-293(in Chinese).
  23. Tang, S. C. , Luo, W. , Jia, Z. H. , Li, S. , Wu, Y. & Zhou, M. (2015). Effect of rain garden on storm runoff reduction. Progress in water science, 26(06), pp. 787-794(in Chinese).
  24. Tang, S. C. , Luo, W. , Jia, Z. H. , Li, S. & Wu, Y. (2015). Effect of rain garden on the removal of nitrogen and phosphorus in different forms of occurrence and the effect of preferential flow in soil. Journal of water resources, 46(008), pp. 943-950(in Chinese).
  25. Tang, S. C. , Luo, W. , Jia, Z. H. & Yuan, H. C.(2012). Experimental Study on infiltration rainwater Runoff storage in Xi 'an Rainwater Garden. Journal of soil and water conservation, 26(06), pp. 75-79(in Chinese).
  26. Tang, S. C. , Luo, W. , Jia, Z. H. , Ma, X. Y. & Shao, Z. X. (2018). Influencing factors of rain garden operation effect based on drainable mod model. Progress in Water Science, 29(03), pp. 407-414(in Chinese).
  27. Trowsdale, S. A. & Simcock, R. (2011). Urban stormwater treatment using bioretention. Journal of Hydrology, 397(3-4), pp. 167-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.11.023
  28. Wang, R. H. W. & Chiles, R. (2022). Ecosystem Benefits Provision of Green Stormwater Infrastructure in Chinese Sponge Cities. Environmental Management, 69(3), p. 558-575. DOI: 10.1007/s00267-021-01565-9
  29. Zhang, B. H., Deng, C. X. , Ma, Y. , Li, J, K , Jiang, C. B. & Ma, M. H. (2019). Retention and purification effect of rainwater garden on roof rainwater. China Water supply and Drainage, 21:29 (in Chinese).
  30. Zhang, J. Y. , Wang, Y. T. , Hu, Q. F. & He, R. M.(2016). Discussion on issues related to sponge city construction. Progress in water science, 27(06), pp. 793-799(in Chinese).
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Weijia Liu
1
Qingbao Pei
2
Wenbiao Dong
2
Pengfan Chen
2

  1. East China University of Technology, Nanchang, China
  2. Nanchang Institute of Technology Poyang Lake Basin Water Engineering Safety and Efficient Utilization National and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory, Nanchang, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

An organobentonite modified with an amphoteric surfactant, tallow dihydroxyethyl betaine (TDHEB), was used as an adsorbent to simultaneously remove Cu(II) and phenol from wastewater. The characteristic of the organobentonite (named TDHEB-bentonite) was analyzed by X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectra and nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm. Batch tests were conducted to evaluate the adsorption capacities of TDHEB-bentonite for the two contaminants. Experiment results demonstrated that the adsorption of both contaminants is highly pH-dependent under acidic conditions. TDHEB-bentonite had about 2.0 and 5.0 times higher adsorption capacity toward Cu(II) and phenol, respectively, relative to the corresponding raw Na-bentonite. Adsorption isotherm data showed that the adsorption processes of both contaminants were well described by Freundlich model. Kinetic experiment demonstrated that both contaminants adsorption processes correlated well with pseudo-second-order model. Cu(II) had a negative impact on phenol adsorption, but not vice versa. Cu(II) was removed mainly through chelating with the organic groups (-CH2CH2OH and -COO-) of TDHEB. Otherwise, partition into the organic phase derived from the adsorbed surfactant was the primarily mechanism for phenol removal. Overall, TDHEB-bentonite was a promising adsorbent for removing Cu(II) and phenol simultaneously from wastewater.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Andronico, M. & Bajda, T. (2019). Modification of Bentonite with Cationic and Nonionic Surfactants: Structural and Textural Features. Materials, 12(22), 3772. DOI:10.3390/ma12223772
  2. Banat, F. A., Al-Bashir, B., Al-Asheh, S. & Hayajneh, O. (2000). Adsorption of phenol by bentonite. Environmental Pollution, 107(3), pp. 391-398. DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00173-6
  3. Bhattacharyya, K. G. & Gupta, S. S. (2008). Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 140(2), pp. 114-131. DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2007.12.008
  4. Cao, L., Li, Z., Xiang, S., Huang, Z., Ruan, R. & Liu, Y. (2019). Preparation and characteristics of bentonite–zeolite adsorbent and its application in swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 284, pp. 448-455. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.043
  5. Chen, H., Zhou, W., Zhu, K., Zhan, H. & Jiang, M. (2004). Sorption of ionizable organic compounds on HDTMA-modified loess soil. Science of The Total Environment, 326(1), pp. 217-223. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.12.011
  6. Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Cheng, X. & Shang, Q. (2020). Rapid removal of phenol/antibiotics in water by Fe-(8-hydroxyquinoline-7-carboxylic)/TiO2 flower composite: Adsorption combined with photocatalysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 402, 126260. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126260
  7. Chu, Y., Khan, M. A., Xia, M., Lei, W., Wang, F., Zhu, S. & Yan, X. (2020). Synthesis and micro-mechanistic studies of histidine modified montmorillonite for lead(II) and copper(II) adsorption from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 157, pp. 142-152. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.020
  8. Díaz-Nava, M. C., Olguín, M. T. & Solache-Ríos, M. (2012). Adsorption of phenol onto surfactants modified bentonite. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, 74(1), 67-75. DOI:10.1007/s10847-011-0084-6
  9. Fan, H., Zhou, L., Jiang, X., Huang, Q. & Lang, W. (2014). Adsorption of Cu2+ and methylene blue on dodecyl sulfobetaine surfactant-modified montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science, 95, pp. 150-158. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2014.04.001
  10. Freundlich, H. (1906). Over the adsorption in solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 57(385471), pp. 1100-1107. DOI:10.1515/zpch-1907-5723
  11. Griffin, R. A. & Shimp, N. F. (1976). Effect of pH on exchange-adsorption or precipitation of lead from landfill leachates by clay minerals. Environmental science & technology, 10(13), pp. 1256-1261. DOI:10.1021/es60123a003
  12. He, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, K., Ye, W. & Wu, D. (2019). Removal of chromium and strontium from aqueous solutions by adsorption on laterite. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(3), pp. 11-20. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.128636
  13. Kong, Y., Wang, L., Ge, Y., Su, H. & Li, Z. (2019). Lignin xanthate resin–bentonite clay composite as a highly effective and low-cost adsorbent for the removal of doxycycline hydrochloride antibiotic and mercury ions in water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 368, pp. 33-41. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.026
  14. Langmuir, I. (1918). The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical society, 40(9), pp. 1361-1403. DOI:10.1021/ja02242a004
  15. Lee, C., Lee, S., Park, J., Park, C., Lee, S. J., Kim, S., An, B., Yun, S., Lee, S. & Choi, J. (2017). Removal of copper, nickel and chromium mixtures from metal plating wastewater by adsorption with modified carbon foam. Chemosphere, 166, pp. 203-211. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.093
  16. Lin, S. & Juang, R. (2002). Heavy metal removal from water by sorption using surfactant-modified montmorillonite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 92(3), pp. 315-326. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00026-2
  17. Liu, C., Wu, P., Zhu, Y. & Tran, L. (2016). Simultaneous adsorption of Cd2+ and BPA on amphoteric surfactant activated montmorillonite. Chemosphere, 144, pp. 1026-1032. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.063
  18. Long, H., Wu, P. & Zhu, N. (2013). Evaluation of Cs+ removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on ethylamine-modified montmorillonite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 225, pp. 237-244. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.088
  19. Ma, J. & Zhu, L. (2006). Simultaneous sorption of phosphate and phenanthrene to inorgano–organo-bentonite from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3), pp. 982-988. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.046
  20. Ma, J. & Zhu, L. (2007). Removal of phenols from water accompanied with synthesis of organobentonite in one-step process. Chemosphere, 68(10), pp. 1883-1888. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.002
  21. Ma, L., Chen, Q., Zhu, J., Xi, Y., He, H., Zhu, R., Tao, Q. & Ayoko, G. A. (2016). Adsorption of phenol and Cu(II) onto cationic and zwitterionic surfactant modified montmorillonite in single and binary systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283, pp. 880-888. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.009
  22. Matthes, W., Madsen, F. T. & Kahr, G. (1999). Sorption of heavy-metal cations by Al and Zr-hydroxy-intercalated and pillared bentonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47(5), pp. 617-629. DOI:10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470508
  23. Meng, Z., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Z. (2008). Simultaneous adsorption of phenol and cadmium on amphoteric modified soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 159(2), pp. 492-498. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.045
  24. Nourmoradi, H., Nikaeen, M. & Khiadani Hajian, M. (2012). Removal of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) from aqueous solutions by montmorillonite modified with nonionic surfactant: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 191, pp. 341-348. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.029
  25. Pal, A., Jayamani, J. & Prasad, R. (2014). An urgent need to reassess the safe levels of copper in the drinking water: Lessons from studies on healthy animals harboring no genetic deficits. NeuroToxicology, 44, pp. 58-60. DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2014.05.005
  26. Park, Y., Ayoko, G. A., Horváth, E., Kurdi, R., Kristof, J. & Frost, R. L. (2013). Structural characterisation and environmental application of organoclays for the removal of phenolic compounds. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 393, pp. 319-334. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.067
  27. Qu, Y., Qin, L., Liu, X. & Yang, Y. (2020). Reasonable design and sifting of microporous carbon nanosphere-based surface molecularly imprinted polymer for selective removal of phenol from wastewater. Chemosphere, 251, 126376. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126376
  28. Redlich, O. & Peterson, D. L. (1959). A useful adsorption isotherm. Journal of physical chemistry, 63(6), 1024. DOI:10.1021/j150576a611
  29. Ren, S., Meng, Z., Sun, X., Lu, H., Zhang, M., Lahori, A. H. & Bu, S. (2020). Comparison of Cd2+ adsorption onto amphoteric, amphoteric-cationic and amphoteric-anionic modified magnetic bentonites. Chemosphere, 239, 124840. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124840
  30. Senturk, H. B., Ozdes, D., Gundogdu, A., Duran, C. & Soylak, M. (2009). Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto organomodified Tirebolu bentonite: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(1), pp. 353-362. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.019
  31. Taffarel, S. R. & Rubio, J. (2010). Adsorption of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate from aqueous solution using a modified natural zeolite with CTAB. Minerals Engineering, 23(10), pp. 771-779. DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2010.05.018
  32. Tri, N. L. M., Thang, P. Q., Van Tan, L., Huong, P. T., Kim, J., Viet, N. M., Phuong, N. M. & Al Tahtamouni, T. M. (2020). Removal of phenolic compounds from wastewaters by using synthesized Fe-nano zeolite. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 101070. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101070
  33. Veli, S. & Alyüz, B. (2007). Adsorption of copper and zinc from aqueous solutions by using natural clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(1), pp. 226-233. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.109
  34. Wang, G., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Ma, S., Wang, Y. & Qiu, J. (2020). Adsorption of heavy metal and organic pollutant by organo-montmorillonites in binary-component system. Journal of Porous Materials, 27(5), pp. 1515-1522. DOI:10.1007/s10934-020-00927-8
  35. Wang, G., Zhang, S., Hua, Y., Su, X., Ma, S., Wang, J., Tao, Q., Wang, Y. & Komarneni, S. (2017). Phenol and/or Zn2+ adsorption by single- or dual-cation organomontmorillonites. Applied Clay Science, 140, pp. 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2017.01.023
  36. Yan, L., Shan, X., Wen, B. & Zhang, S. (2007). Effect of lead on the sorption of phenol onto montmorillonites and organo-montmorillonites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 308(1), pp. 11-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.027
  37. Yang, G., Tang, L., Zeng, G., Cai, Y., Tang, J., Pang, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, S. & Xiong, W. (2015). Simultaneous removal of lead and phenol contamination from water by nitrogen-functionalized magnetic ordered mesoporous carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 259, pp. 854-864. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.081
  38. Yoo, J., Choi, J., Lee, T. & Park, J. (2004). Organobentonite for sorption and degradation of phenol in the presence of heavy metals. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 154(1), pp. 225-237. DOI:10.1023/B:WATE.0000022970.21712.64
  39. Yu, K., Xu, J., Jiang, X., Liu, C., McCall, W. & Lu, J. (2017). Stabilization of heavy metals in soil using two organo-bentonites. Chemosphere, 184, pp.884-891. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.040
  40. Zendelska, A., Golomeova, M., Golomeov, B. & Krstev, B. (2018). Removal of lead ions from acid aqueous solutions and acid mine drainage using zeolite bearing tuff. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(1), pp. 87-96. DOI:10.24425/118185
  41. Zhu, R., Chen, Q., Zhou, Q., Xi, Y., Zhu, J. & He, H. (2016). Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Applied Clay Science, 123, pp. 239-258. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.024
  42. Andronico, M. & Bajda, T. (2019). Modification of Bentonite with Cationic and Nonionic Surfactants: Structural and Textural Features. Materials, 12(22), 3772. DOI:10.3390/ma12223772
  43. Banat, F. A., Al-Bashir, B., Al-Asheh, S. & Hayajneh, O. (2000). Adsorption of phenol by bentonite. Environmental Pollution, 107(3), pp. 391-398. DOI:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00173-6
  44. Bhattacharyya, K. G. & Gupta, S. S. (2008). Adsorption of a few heavy metals on natural and modified kaolinite and montmorillonite: A review. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 140(2), pp. 114-131. DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2007.12.008
  45. Cao, L., Li, Z., Xiang, S., Huang, Z., Ruan, R. & Liu, Y. (2019). Preparation and characteristics of bentonite–zeolite adsorbent and its application in swine wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 284, pp. 448-455. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.043
  46. Chen, H., Zhou, W., Zhu, K., Zhan, H. & Jiang, M. (2004). Sorption of ionizable organic compounds on HDTMA-modified loess soil. Science of The Total Environment, 326(1), pp. 217-223. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.12.011
  47. Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, L., Cheng, X. & Shang, Q. (2020). Rapid removal of phenol/antibiotics in water by Fe-(8-hydroxyquinoline-7-carboxylic)/TiO2 flower composite: Adsorption combined with photocatalysis. Chemical Engineering Journal, 402, 126260. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2020.126260
  48. Chu, Y., Khan, M. A., Xia, M., Lei, W., Wang, F., Zhu, S. & Yan, X. (2020). Synthesis and micro-mechanistic studies of histidine modified montmorillonite for lead(II) and copper(II) adsorption from wastewater. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 157, pp. 142-152. DOI:10.1016/j.cherd.2020.02.020
  49. Díaz-Nava, M. C., Olguín, M. T. & Solache-Ríos, M. (2012). Adsorption of phenol onto surfactants modified bentonite. Journal of Inclusion Phenomena and Macrocyclic Chemistry, 74(1), 67-75. DOI:10.1007/s10847-011-0084-6
  50. Fan, H., Zhou, L., Jiang, X., Huang, Q. & Lang, W. (2014). Adsorption of Cu2+ and methylene blue on dodecyl sulfobetaine surfactant-modified montmorillonite. Applied Clay Science, 95, pp. 150-158. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2014.04.001
  51. Freundlich, H. (1906). Over the adsorption in solution. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 57(385471), pp. 1100-1107. DOI:10.1515/zpch-1907-5723
  52. Griffin, R. A. & Shimp, N. F. (1976). Effect of pH on exchange-adsorption or precipitation of lead from landfill leachates by clay minerals. Environmental science & technology, 10(13), pp. 1256-1261. DOI:10.1021/es60123a003
  53. He, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, K., Ye, W. & Wu, D. (2019). Removal of chromium and strontium from aqueous solutions by adsorption on laterite. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45(3), pp. 11-20. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.128636
  54. Kong, Y., Wang, L., Ge, Y., Su, H. & Li, Z. (2019). Lignin xanthate resin–bentonite clay composite as a highly effective and low-cost adsorbent for the removal of doxycycline hydrochloride antibiotic and mercury ions in water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 368, pp. 33-41. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.026
  55. Langmuir, I. (1918). The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. Journal of the American Chemical society, 40(9), pp. 1361-1403. DOI:10.1021/ja02242a004
  56. Lee, C., Lee, S., Park, J., Park, C., Lee, S. J., Kim, S., An, B., Yun, S., Lee, S. & Choi, J. (2017). Removal of copper, nickel and chromium mixtures from metal plating wastewater by adsorption with modified carbon foam. Chemosphere, 166, pp. 203-211. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.093
  57. Lin, S. & Juang, R. (2002). Heavy metal removal from water by sorption using surfactant-modified montmorillonite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 92(3), pp. 315-326. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3894(02)00026-2
  58. Liu, C., Wu, P., Zhu, Y. & Tran, L. (2016). Simultaneous adsorption of Cd2+ and BPA on amphoteric surfactant activated montmorillonite. Chemosphere, 144, pp. 1026-1032. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.09.063
  59. Long, H., Wu, P. & Zhu, N. (2013). Evaluation of Cs+ removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on ethylamine-modified montmorillonite. Chemical Engineering Journal, 225, pp. 237-244. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.088
  60. Ma, J. & Zhu, L. (2006). Simultaneous sorption of phosphate and phenanthrene to inorgano–organo-bentonite from water. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3), pp. 982-988. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.046
  61. Ma, J. & Zhu, L. (2007). Removal of phenols from water accompanied with synthesis of organobentonite in one-step process. Chemosphere, 68(10), pp. 1883-1888. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.03.002
  62. Ma, L., Chen, Q., Zhu, J., Xi, Y., He, H., Zhu, R., Tao, Q. & Ayoko, G. A. (2016). Adsorption of phenol and Cu(II) onto cationic and zwitterionic surfactant modified montmorillonite in single and binary systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 283, pp. 880-888. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.009
  63. Matthes, W., Madsen, F. T. & Kahr, G. (1999). Sorption of heavy-metal cations by Al and Zr-hydroxy-intercalated and pillared bentonite. Clays and Clay Minerals, 47(5), pp. 617-629. DOI:10.1346/CCMN.1999.0470508
  64. Meng, Z., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Z. (2008). Simultaneous adsorption of phenol and cadmium on amphoteric modified soil. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 159(2), pp. 492-498. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.045
  65. Nourmoradi, H., Nikaeen, M. & Khiadani Hajian, M. (2012). Removal of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) from aqueous solutions by montmorillonite modified with nonionic surfactant: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. Chemical Engineering Journal, 191, pp. 341-348. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.029
  66. Pal, A., Jayamani, J. & Prasad, R. (2014). An urgent need to reassess the safe levels of copper in the drinking water: Lessons from studies on healthy animals harboring no genetic deficits. NeuroToxicology, 44, pp. 58-60. DOI:10.1016/j.neuro.2014.05.005
  67. Park, Y., Ayoko, G. A., Horváth, E., Kurdi, R., Kristof, J. & Frost, R. L. (2013). Structural characterisation and environmental application of organoclays for the removal of phenolic compounds. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 393, pp. 319-334. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2012.10.067
  68. Qu, Y., Qin, L., Liu, X. & Yang, Y. (2020). Reasonable design and sifting of microporous carbon nanosphere-based surface molecularly imprinted polymer for selective removal of phenol from wastewater. Chemosphere, 251, 126376. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126376
  69. Redlich, O. & Peterson, D. L. (1959). A useful adsorption isotherm. Journal of physical chemistry, 63(6), 1024. DOI:10.1021/j150576a611
  70. Ren, S., Meng, Z., Sun, X., Lu, H., Zhang, M., Lahori, A. H. & Bu, S. (2020). Comparison of Cd2+ adsorption onto amphoteric, amphoteric-cationic and amphoteric-anionic modified magnetic bentonites. Chemosphere, 239, 124840. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124840
  71. Senturk, H. B., Ozdes, D., Gundogdu, A., Duran, C. & Soylak, M. (2009). Removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto organomodified Tirebolu bentonite: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic study. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 172(1), pp. 353-362. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.019
  72. Taffarel, S. R. & Rubio, J. (2010). Adsorption of sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate from aqueous solution using a modified natural zeolite with CTAB. Minerals Engineering, 23(10), pp. 771-779. DOI:10.1016/j.mineng.2010.05.018
  73. Tri, N. L. M., Thang, P. Q., Van Tan, L., Huong, P. T., Kim, J., Viet, N. M., Phuong, N. M. & Al Tahtamouni, T. M. (2020). Removal of phenolic compounds from wastewaters by using synthesized Fe-nano zeolite. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 33, 101070. DOI:10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.101070
  74. Veli, S. & Alyüz, B. (2007). Adsorption of copper and zinc from aqueous solutions by using natural clay. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 149(1), pp. 226-233. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.04.109
  75. Wang, G., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Ma, S., Wang, Y. & Qiu, J. (2020). Adsorption of heavy metal and organic pollutant by organo-montmorillonites in binary-component system. Journal of Porous Materials, 27(5), pp. 1515-1522. DOI:10.1007/s10934-020-00927-8
  76. Wang, G., Zhang, S., Hua, Y., Su, X., Ma, S., Wang, J., Tao, Q., Wang, Y. & Komarneni, S. (2017). Phenol and/or Zn2+ adsorption by single- or dual-cation organomontmorillonites. Applied Clay Science, 140, pp. 1-9. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2017.01.023
  77. Yan, L., Shan, X., Wen, B. & Zhang, S. (2007). Effect of lead on the sorption of phenol onto montmorillonites and organo-montmorillonites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 308(1), pp. 11-19. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2006.12.027
  78. Yang, G., Tang, L., Zeng, G., Cai, Y., Tang, J., Pang, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, S. & Xiong, W. (2015). Simultaneous removal of lead and phenol contamination from water by nitrogen-functionalized magnetic ordered mesoporous carbon. Chemical Engineering Journal, 259, pp. 854-864. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2014.08.081
  79. Yoo, J., Choi, J., Lee, T. & Park, J. (2004). Organobentonite for sorption and degradation of phenol in the presence of heavy metals. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 154(1), pp. 225-237. DOI:10.1023/B:WATE.0000022970.21712.64
  80. Yu, K., Xu, J., Jiang, X., Liu, C., McCall, W. & Lu, J. (2017). Stabilization of heavy metals in soil using two organo-bentonites. Chemosphere, 184, pp.884-891. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.06.040
  81. Zendelska, A., Golomeova, M., Golomeov, B. & Krstev, B. (2018). Removal of lead ions from acid aqueous solutions and acid mine drainage using zeolite bearing tuff. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(1), pp. 87-96. DOI:10.24425/118185
  82. Zhu, R., Chen, Q., Zhou, Q., Xi, Y., Zhu, J. & He, H. (2016). Adsorbents based on montmorillonite for contaminant removal from water: A review. Applied Clay Science, 123, pp. 239-258. DOI:10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.024
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Xiangyang Hu
1
Bao Wang
2
ORCID: ORCID
Gengsheng Yan
1
Bizhou Ge
2

  1. PowerChina Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, China
  2. Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The linuron contaminated soil was subjected to remediation using ozone as an oxidant. The experiments were performed both in laboratory and pilot plant installations. Kinetics of linuron degradation was determined for both systems. Moreover, main linuron metabolites were identified, and possible degradation pathway was proposed. The soil remediation was found to be successful, which was verified by chemical and biological tests. The half-life time of linuron in the pilot scale installation was no more than 7.5 h. To verify the efficiency of soil detoxification, a toxicity test was performed, which utilized Eisenia foetida earthworm. The test organisms were exposed for 14 days to the linuron contaminated soil prior and after the remediation procedure. It was observed that in the control group and the group of organisms exposed to the ozonated soil, the survivability was 100%, whereas the earthworms exposed to the linuron contaminated soil that was not ozonated did not survive at all.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Abu Ghalwa, N., Hamada, M., Abu Shawish, H. M. & Shubair O. (2016). Electrochemical degradation of linuron in aqueous solution using Pb/PbO2 and C/PbO2 electrodes. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 9, pp. 821–828. DOI:10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.08.006
  2. Antos, P., Józefczyk, R., Kisała, J. & Balawejder, M. (2012). Remediation of imidacloprid contaminated soil - comparison of two different reactors for the ozone treatment. Xe-nobiotics, Soil, Food and Human Health Interactions, Rzeszów ISBN 978-83-7338-785-0, pp. 147-158
  3. Assokeng, T., Noumi, G. B., Adjia, H.Z. & Sieliechi, J. M. (2021). Assessment of the Risk of Contaminating Soil Cultivation Fruits and Vegetables by Linuron Residues in the Market Gardening Zone in Marza in Ngaoundere – Cameroon. Resources and Envi-ronment 11(1): pp. 1-8 DOI:10.5923/j.re.20211101.01
  4. Balawejder, M., Antos, P., Czyjit Kuryło, S., Józefczyk, R. & Pieniążek, M. (2014). A novel metod for remediation of DDT contaminated soil. Ozone Science&Engineering, 36, pp.166-173. DOI:10.1080/01919512.2013.861324
  5. Balawejder, M., Antos, P., Józefczyk, R. & Pieniążek, M. (2016a). A method for remediation of soil contaminated with simazine. Archives of Environmental Protection, 42(3), pp. 41–46. DOI:10.1515/aep-2016-0024
  6. Balawejder, M., Józefczyk, R., Antos, P. & Pieniążek, M. (2016b). Pilot-scale Installation for Remediation of DDT-contaminated soil. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 38, pp. 272-278. DOI:10.1080/01919512.2015.1136556
  7. Barchańska, H., Czaplicka, M. & Kyzioł-Komosińska, J. (2020). Interaction of selected pesticides with mineral and organic soil components. Archives of Environmental Protection, 46 (3), pp. 80–91. DOI:10.24425/aep.2020.134538
  8. Boughattas, I., Hattab, S., Boussetta, H., Sappin-Didier, V., Viarengo, A., Banni, M. & Sforzini, S. (2016). Biomarker responses of Eisenia andrei to a polymetallic gradient near a lead mining site in North Tunisia. Environmental Pollution, 218 pp. 530-541. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.07.033
  9. Buleandra, M., Popa, D.E., David, I.G., Bacalum, E., David, V. & Ciucu, A.A. (2019). Electrochemical behavior study of some selected phenylurea herbicides at activated pencil graphite electrode. Electrooxidation of linuron and monolinuron. Microchemical Journal, 147, pp. 1109–1116. DOI:10.1016/j.microc.2019.04.042
  10. Fenoll, J., Martínez-Menchón, M., Navarro, G., Vela, N. & Navarro, S. (2013). Photocatalytic degradation of substituted phenylurea herbicides in aqueous semiconductor suspensions exposed to solar energy. Chemosphere, 91, pp. 571–578. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.067
  11. Hankard, P.K., Svendsen, C., Wright, J., Weinberg, C., Fishwick, S.K., Spurgeon, D.J. & Weeks, J.M. (2004). Biological assessment of contaminated land using earthworm biomarkers in support of chemical analysis. Sci. Total Environ., 330, pp. 9-20. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.08.023
  12. Katsumata, H., Kobayashi, T., Kaneco, S., Suzuki, T. & Ohta, K. (2011) Degradation of linuron by ultrasound combined with photo-Fenton treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 166, pp. 468–473. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.073
  13. Kuo, S. L. & Wu, E.M.-Y. (2021). Remediation Efficiency of the In Situ Vitrification Method at an Unidentified-Waste and Groundwater Treatment Site. Water, 13, 3594. DOI:10.3390/w13243594
  14. Liu, T., Liu, Y., Fang, K., Zhang, X. & Wang, X. (2020). Transcriptome, bioaccumulation and toxicity analyses of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) affected by trifloxystrobin and trifloxystrobin acid. Environmental Pollution, 265, Part B, 115100. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115100
  15. Lowe, C. N. & Butt, K. R. (2007). Earthworm culture, maintenance and species selection in chronic ecotoxicological studies: A critical review. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43, pp. 281-288. DOI:10.1016/j.ejsobi.2007.08.028
  16. Lowe, C.N. & Butt, K.R. (2005). Culture techniques for soil dwelling earthworms: a review. Pedobiologia, 49 (5), pp. 401-413. DOI:10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.04.005
  17. Moore, M.N. (1976). Cytochemical demonstration of latency of lysosomal hydrolases in the digestive cells of the common mussel, Mytilus edulis, and changes induced by thermal stress. Cell. Tissue Res. 175, pp. 279-287. DOI:10.1007/BF00218706
  18. Mussatto, S.I. (2016). Biomass Fractionation Technologies for a Lignocellulosic Feedstock Based Biorefinery, ISBN 978-0-12-802323-5 pp. 410-411
  19. OECD Guideline For Testing Of Chemicals No. 207: Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia Andrei), OECD 1984. DOI:10.1787/9789264070042-en
  20. OECD Guideline For Testing Of Chemicals No. 222: Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia Andrei), OECD 2004 https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/Draft-Updated-Test-Guildeline-222-Earthworm-reproduction-Test.pdf
  21. Quan, X., Zhao, X., Chen, S., Zhao, H., Chen, J. & Zhao, Y. (2005). Enhancement of p,p’-DDT photodegradation on soil surfaces using TiO2 induced by UV-light, Chemosphere, 60, pp. 266-273. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.11.044
  22. Rao, Y.F. & Chu, W. (2010). Degradation of linuron by UV, ozonation, and UV/O3 processes—Effect of anions and reaction mechanism. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 180, pp. 514–523. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.063
  23. Rosal, R., Gonzalo, M. S., Rodríguez, A., Perdigón-Melón, J.A. & García-Calvo, E. (2010). Catalytic ozonation of atrazine and linuron on MnOx/Al2O3 and MnOx/SBA-15 in a fixed bed reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 165, pp. 806–812. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2010.10.020
  24. Sforzini, S., Moore, M.N., Boeri, M., Bencivenga, M. & Viarengo, A. (2015). Effects of PAHs and dioxins on the earthworm Eisenia andrei: A multivariate approach for biomarker interpretation. Environmental Pollution, 196 pp. 60-71. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2014.09.015
  25. Svendsen, C., Spurgeon, D.J., Hankard, P.K. & Weeks, J.M. (2004). A review of lysosomal membrane stability measured by neutral red retention: is it a workable earthworm biomarker?. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 57, pp. 20–29. DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2003.08.009
  26. Svendsen, C., Meharg, A.A., Freestone, P. & Weeks, J.M. (1996). Use of an earthworm lysosomal biomarker for the ecological assessment of pollution from an industrial plastics fire. Soil Ecology, 3, pp. 99-107. DOI:10.1016/0929-1393(95)00085-2
  27. Spirhanzlova, P., De Groef, B., Nicholson, F.E., Grommen, S.V.H., Marras, G., Sébillot, A., Demeneix, B.A., Pallud-Mothré, S., Lemkine, G.F., Tindall, A.J. & Du Pasquier, D. (2017). Using short-term bioassays to evaluate the endocrine disrupting capacity of the pesticides linuron and fenoxycarb. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part C, 200, pp. 52–58. DOI:10.1016/j.cbpc.2017.06.006
  28. Swarcewicz, M., Gregorczyk, A. & Sobczak, J. (2013). Comparison of linuron degradation in the presence of pesticide mixtures in soil under laboratory conditions. Environ Monit Assess, 185, pp. 8109–8114. DOI:10.1007/s10661-013-3158-7
  29. Zhao, S., Wang, Y. & Duo, L. (2021). Biochemical toxicity, lysosomal membrane stability and DNA damage induced by graphene oxide in earthworms. Environmental Pollution, 269, 116225. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116225
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Radosław Józefczyk
1
Piotr Antos
2
Marcin Pieniążek
1
Maciej Balawejder
1

  1. University of Rzeszów, Poland
  2. Rzeszow University of Technology, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Pollution continues to experience a rapid increase so cities in the world have required the use of renewable energy. One of the keys that can prevent climate change with a sustainable system is renewable energy. Renewable energy production, especially for hybrid systems from biomass and wind, is the objective of the analysis in this work. The potential of feedstock for different biofuels such as bio-diesel, bio-ethanol, bio-methane, bio-hydrogen, and biomass is also discussed in this paper. The sustainability of the energy system for the long term is the main focus of work in this investigation. The configuration of the hybrid system between biomass energy and wind energy as well as some problems from various design factors are also presented. Based on the findings, this alternative energy utilization through biomass-based hybrids can save costs and improve environmental conditions, especially for the electrification of off-grid rural areas. This paper will provide important information to policymakers, academics, and investors, especially in carrying out the development and factors related to the utilization of wind-biomass-based hybrid energy systems.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Aguilar-Rivera, N., Michel-Cuello, C., Cervantes-Niño, J.J, Gómez-Merino, F.C. Olvera, & Vargas, L.A. (2021). 12 - Effects of public policies on the sustainability of the biofuels value chain. In: Ray RCBT-SB (ed) Applied Biotechnology Reviews. Academic Press, pp 345–379
  2. Al-Ghussain, L., Darwish, Ahmad, A., Abubaker, A. M. & Mohamed, M. A. (2021). An integrated photovoltaic/wind/biomass and hybrid energy storage systems towards 100% renewable energy microgrids in university campuses. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments, 46:101273. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101273
  3. Alagumalai, A., Mathimani, T., Pugazhendhi, A., Atabani, A.E., Brindhadevi, K. & Canh, N.D. (2020). Experimental insight into co-combustion characteristics of oxygenated biofuels in modified DICI engine. Fuel, 278:118303. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118303
  4. Amjith, L.R. & Bavanish, B. (2021a). Design and analysis of 5 MW horizontal axis wind turbine. Mater Today Proc. 37, pp. 3338–3342.
  5. Amjith, L.R. & Bavanish, B. (2021b). Optimization of horizontal axis wind turbine blade using FEA. Mater Today Proc. 37, pp. 3367–3371. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.215
  6. Arias, D.M., Ortíz-Sánchez, E., Okoye, P.U., Rodríguez-Rangel, H., Ortega, A.B., Longoria, A., Domínguez-Espíndola, R. & Sebastian, P.J. (2021). A review on cyanobacteria cultivation for carbohydrate-based biofuels: Cultivation aspects, polysaccharides accumulation strategies, and biofuels production scenarios. Sci Total Environ. 794:148636. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148636
  7. Arteaga-López, E. & Angeles-Camacho, C. (2021). Innovative virtual computational domain based on wind rose diagrams for micrositing small wind turbines. Energy, 220:119701. DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2020.119701
  8. Arumugam, P., Ramalingam, V. & Bhaganagar, K. (2021). A pathway towards sustainable development of small capacity horizontal axis wind turbines – Identification of influencing design parameters & their role on performance analysis. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments, 44:101019. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101019
  9. Bodzek, M. (2022). Nanoparticles for water disinfection by photocatalysis: A review. Arch Environ Prot. 48, pp. 3–17. DOI:10.24425/aep.2022.140541
  10. Chen, H., Xia, A., Zhu, X., Huang, Y., Zhu, X. & Liao, Q. (2022). Hydrothermal hydrolysis of algal biomass for biofuels production: A review. Bioresour Technol. 344:126213. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126213
  11. Chen, J., Li, X., Jia, W., Shen, S., Deng, S., Ji, B. & Chang, J. (2021). Promotion of bioremediation performance in constructed wetland microcosms for acid mine drainage treatment by using organic substrates and supplementing domestic wastewater and plant litter broth. J Hazard Mater, 404:124125. DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124125
  12. Chilakamarry, C.R., Mimi Sakinah, A.M., Zularisam, A.W., Pandey, A. & Dai-Viet, N. Vo. (2021). Technological perspectives for utilisation of waste glycerol for the production of biofuels: A review. Environ Technol Innov. 24:101902. DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101902
  13. Chmielniak, T. (2019). Wind and solar energy technologies of hydrogen production – a review of issues. Polityka Energ - Energy Policy J. 22, pp.5–20.
  14. Chowdhury, H., Loganathan, B., Mustary, I., Alam, F. & Mobil, S.M.A. (2019). Chapter 12 - Algae for biofuels: The third generation of feedstock. [In:] Basile, A., Dalena, F.B.T-S. and TG, F. (eds). Elsevier, pp 323–344
  15. Chudy, R., Szulecki, K., Siry, J. & Grala, R. (2021). Woody Biomass for Energy Production. Acad - Mag Polish Acad Sci. 62–65. DOI:10.24425/academiaPAS.2021.138414
  16. Council GWE (2021) GWEC global wind report 2021. Glob Wind Energy Counc Brussels, Belgium
  17. Das, P.V.P. C., Mathimani, T. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021a). A comprehensive review on the factors affecting thermochemical conversion efficiency of algal biomass to energy. Sci Total Environ. 766:144213. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144213
  18. Das, P.V.P.C., Mathimani, T. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021b). Recent advances in thermochemical methods for the conversion of algal biomass to energy. Sci Total Environ. 766:144608. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144608
  19. Deviram, G., Mathimani, T., Anto, S., Ahamed, T.S., Ananth, D.A. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2020). Applications of microalgal and cyanobacterial biomass on a way to safe, cleaner and a sustainable environment. J Clean Prod. 253:119770. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119770
  20. Erdiwansyah, E., Mahidin, M., Husin, H., Nasaruddin, N., Khairil, K., Zaki, M. & Jamaluddin, J. (2020). Investigation of availability, demand, targets, economic growth and development of RE 2017-2050: Case study in Indonesia. International Journal of Coal Science & Technology, 8, pp. 483–499. DOI:10.1007/s40789-020-00391-4
  21. Erdiwansyah, E., Gani, A. M.H.N., Mamat, R. & Sarjono, R.E. (2022). Policies and laws in the application of renewable energy Indonesia: A reviews. AIMS Energy, 10, pp. 23–44. DOI:10.3934/energy.2022002
  22. Erdiwansyah, E., Mahidin, H. H., Nasaruddin, S., Zaki, M. & Muhibbddin. (2021). A critical review of the integration of renewable energy sources with various technologies. Prot Control Mod Power Syst. 6:3. DOI:10.1186/s41601-021-00181-3
  23. Erdiwansyah, E., Mamat, R., Sani, M.S.M., Sudhakar, K., Kadarohman, A. & Sardjono, R.E. (2019a). An overview of Higher alcohol and biodiesel as alternative fuels in engines. Energy Reports, 5, pp.467–479. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2019.04.009
  24. Erdiwansyah,E., Mamat, R., Sani, M.S.M. & Sudhakar, K. (2019b). Renewable energy in Southeast Asia: Policies and recommendations. Sci Total Environ. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.273
  25. Ergal, İ., Fuchs, W., Hasibar, B., Thallinger, B., Bochmann, G. & Rittmann, S.K-M.R. (2018). The physiology and biotechnology of dark fermentative biohydrogen production. Biotechnol Adv. 36, pp. 2165–2186. DOI:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.10.005
  26. Farina, A. & Anctil, A. (2022). Material consumption and environmental impact of wind turbines in the USA and globally. Resour Conserv Recycl. 176:105938. DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105938
  27. Ferreira Mota, G., Germano de Sousa, I., Luiz Barros de Oliveira, A., Cavalcante, A.L.G., Moreira, K.S., Cavalcante, F.T.T., Erick da Silva Souza, J., Rafael de Aguiar Falcão, I., Rocha, T.G., Valério, R.B.R., Cristina Freitas de Carvalho, S., Neto, F.S., Serpa, J.F., Karolinny Chaves de Lima, R., Cristiane Martins de Souza, M. & José C.S. dos Santos. (2022). Biodiesel production from microalgae using lipase-based catalysts: Current challenges and prospects. Algal Res. 62:102616. DOI:10.1016/j.algal.2021.102616
  28. Gambelli, D., Alberti, F., Solfanelli, F., Vairo, D. & Zanoli, R. (2017). Third generation algae biofuels in Italy by 2030: A scenario analysis using Bayesian networks. Energy Policy, 103, pp. 165–178. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.01.013
  29. Gaonkar, R.U. & Hegde, R.N. (2022). An investigation on the performance and viability of a hybrid twisted blade profile for a horizontal axis micro wind turbine. Mater Today Proc. 49, pp. 1200–1209. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.06.288
  30. Ge, S., Manigandan, S., Mathimani, T., Basha, S., Xia, C., Brindhadevi, K., Unpaprom, Y., Whangchai, K. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2022). An assessment of agricultural waste cellulosic biofuel for improved combustion and emission characteristics. Sci Total Environ. 813:152418
  31. Ge, S., Yek, P.N.Y., Cheng, Y.W., Xia, C., Mahari, W.A.W., Liew, R.K., Peng, W., Yuan, T.Q., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Sonne, C. & Lam S.S. (2021). Progress in microwave pyrolysis conversion of agricultural waste to value-added biofuels: A batch to continuous approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 135:110148. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110148
  32. Ghosh, M., Ghosh, A. & Roy, A. (2020). Renewable and Sustainable Materials in Automotive Industry. [In:] Hashmi, S., Choudhury IABT-E of R and SM (eds). Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 162–179
  33. Glivin, G., Edwin, M. & Sekhar, S.J. (2018). Techno‐economic studies on the influences of nonuniform feeding in the biogas plants of educational institutions. Environ Prog Sustain Energy, 37, pp. 2156–2164
  34. Glivin, G., Kalaiselvan, N., Mariappan, V., Premalatha, M., Murugan, P.C. & Sekhar, J. (2021a). Conversion of biowaste to biogas: A review of current status on techno-economic challenges, policies, technologies and mitigation to environmental impacts. Fuel, 302:121153. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121153
  35. Glivin, G. & Sekhar, J. (2020a). Simulation of anaerobic digesters for the non-uniform loading of biowaste generated from an educational institution. Lat Am Appl Res Int J. 50, pp. 33–40.
  36. Glivin, G. & Sekhar, S.J. (2020b). Waste potential, barriers and economic benefits of implementing different models of biogas plants in a few Indian educational institutions. BioEnergy Res. 13, pp. 668–682.
  37. Glivin, G., Vairavan, M., Manickam, P. & Santhappan, J.S. (2021b). Techno Economic Studies on the Effective Utilization of Non-Uniform Biowaste Generation for Biogas Production. Anaerob Dig Built Environ. 81.
  38. Goh, Y., Yap, S.P. & Tong, T.Y. (2020). Bamboo: The Emerging Renewable Material for Sustainable Construction. [In:] Hashmi S, Choudhury IABT-E of R and SM (eds). Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 365–376
  39. Guo, T., Guo, X., Gao, Z., Li, S., Zheng, X., Gao, X., Li, R., Wang, T., Li, Y. & Li, D. (2021). Nacelle and tower effect on a stand-alone wind turbine energy output—A discussion on field measurements of a small wind turbine. Appl Energy, 303:117590. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117590
  40. Gururani, P., Bhatnagar, P., Bisht, B., Jaiswal, K.K., Kumar, V., Kumar, S., Vlaskin, M.S., Grigorenko, A.V. & Rindin, K.G. (2022). Recent advances and viability in sustainable thermochemical conversion of sludge to bio-fuel production. Fuel, 316:123351. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123351
  41. GWEC (2021). GWEC forecasts 817 GW of wind power in 2021. https://gwec.net/gwec-forecasts-817-gw-of-wind-power-in-2021/#:~:text=The global cumulative installed wind,153.5 GW in 2017-2021.
  42. Heffron, R.J., Körner, M-F., Sumarno, T., Wagner, J., Weibelzahl, M. & Fridgen, G. (2022). How different electricity pricing systems affect the energy trilemma: Assessing Indonesia’s electricity market transition. Energy Econ, 107:105663. DOI:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105663
  43. Hien, P.D. (2019) Excessive electricity intensity of Vietnam: Evidence from a comparative study of Asia-Pacific countries. Energy Policy, 130, pp. 409–417. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.025
  44. Indonesia C (2021) RI Targets Renewable Energy to Reach 50% by 2050
  45. International Energy Agency IEA, Bank W (2014) Sustainable Energy for All 2013-2014: Global Tracking Framework Report. The World Bank
  46. Jurasz, J. & Mikulik, J. (2017) Economic and environmental analysis of a hybrid solar, wind and pumped storage hydroelectric energy source: a Polish perspective. Bull. Polish Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 65, pp. 859–869
  47. Kalinichenko, A. & Havrysh, V. (2019). Feasibility study of biogas project development: technology maturity, feedstock, and utilization pathway. Arch Environ Prot. 45, pp. 68–83. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.126423
  48. Kandasamy, S., Bhuvanendran, N., Narayanan, M. & He, Z. (2022). Chapter 13 - Thermochemical conversion of algal biomass. [In:] El-Sheekh, M., Abomohra AE-FBT-H of AB (eds). Elsevier, pp. 281–302
  49. Kandasamy, S., Devarayan, K., Bhuvanendran, N., Zhang, B., He, Z., Narayanan, M., Mathimani, T., Ravichandran, S. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021). Accelerating the production of bio-oil from hydrothermal liquefaction of microalgae via recycled biochar-supported catalysts. J Environ Chem Eng. 9:105321. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105321
  50. Karpagam, R., Jawaharraj, K. & Gnanam, R. (2021). Review on integrated biofuel production from microalgal biomass through the outset of transesterification route: a cascade approach for sustainable bioenergy. Sci Total Environ. 766:144236. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144236
  51. Kim, B., Heo, H.Y., Son, J., Yang, J., Chang, Y.K., Lee, J.H. & Lee, J.W. (2019). Simplifying biodiesel production from microalgae via wet in situ transesterification: A review in current research and future prospects. Algal Res. 41:101557. DOI:10.1016/j.algal.2019.101557
  52. Klaimi, R., Alnouri, S.Y. & Stijepović, M. (2021). Design and thermo-economic evaluation of an integrated concentrated solar power – Desalination tri-generation system. Energy Convers Manag. 249:114865. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114865
  53. Kulyal, L. & Jalal, P. (2022). Bioenergy, a finer alternative for India: Scope, barriers, socio-economic benefits and identified solution. Bioresour Technol Reports, 17:100947. DOI:10.1016/j.biteb.2022.100947
  54. Kumar, G., Cho, S-K., Sivagurunathan, P., Anburajan, P., Mahapatra, D.M., Park, J.H., Pugazhendhi, A. (2018) Insights into evolutionary trends in molecular biology tools in microbial screening for biohydrogen production through dark fermentation. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 43: pp. 19885–19901. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.040
  55. Kumar, G., Mathimani, T., Sivaramakrishnan, R., Shanmugam, S., Bhatia, S.K., Pugazhendhi, A. (2020). Application of molecular techniques in biohydrogen production as a clean fuel. Sci Total Environ. 722:137795. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137795
  56. Kumar Sharma, A., Kumar Ghodke, P., Manna, S. & Chen, W-H. (2021). Emerging technologies for sustainable production of biohydrogen production from microalgae: A state-of-the-art review of upstream and downstream processes. Bioresour Technol. 342:126057. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126057
  57. Lagdani, O., Tarfaoui, M., Nachtane, M., Trihi, M. & Laaouidi, H. (2021). Modal analysis of an iced offshore composite wind turbine blade. Wind Eng. 0309524X211011685
  58. Lin, C-Y. & Lu, C. (2021). Development perspectives of promising lignocellulose feedstocks for production of advanced generation biofuels: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 136:110445. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110445
  59. Liu, H., Li, Y., Duan, Z. & Chen, C. (2020). A review on multi-objective optimization framework in wind energy forecasting techniques and applications. Energy Convers Manag. 224:113324. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113324
  60. Malik, P., Awasthi, M. & Sinha, S. (2022). A techno-economic investigation of grid integrated hybrid renewable energy systems. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments, 51:101976. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2022.101976
  61. Mathimani, T. & Mallick, N. (2019). A review on the hydrothermal processing of microalgal biomass to bio-oil - Knowledge gaps and recent advances. J Clean Prod. 217, pp. 69–84. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.129
  62. Mathimani, T., Sekar, M., Shanmugam, S., Sabir, J.S.M., Chi, N.T.L. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021). Relative abundance of lipid types among Chlorella sp. and Scenedesmus sp. and ameliorating homogeneous acid catalytic conditions using central composite design (CCD) for maximizing fatty acid methyl ester yield. Sci Total Environ. 771:144700. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144700
  63. Micallef, D. & Rezaeiha, A. (2021). Floating offshore wind turbine aerodynamics: Trends and future challenges. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 152:111696. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111696
  64. Mielcarek-Bocheńska, P. & Rzeźnik, W. (2019) Ammonia emission from livestock productionin Poland and its regional diversity in the years 2005–2017. Arch Environ Prot. 45, pp. 114–121. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.130247
  65. Mori, A. (2021) 2 Struggles for energy transition in the electricity system in Asian countries. China’s Carbon-Energy Policy Asia’s Energy Transit Carbon Leakage, Relocat Halos 23
  66. Moshood, T.D., Nawanir, G. & Mahmud, F. (2021). Microalgae biofuels production: A systematic review on socioeconomic prospects of microalgae biofuels and policy implications. Environ Challenges, 5:100207. DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100207
  67. Musharavati, F., Khanmohammadi, S. & Pakseresht, A. (2021). A novel multi-generation energy system based on geothermal energy source: Thermo-economic evaluation and optimization. Energy Convers Manag. 230:113829. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2021.113829
  68. Narwane, V.S., Yadav, V.S., Raut, R.D., Narkhede, B.E. & Gardas, B.B. (2021). Sustainable development challenges of the biofuel industry in India based on integrated MCDM approach. Renew Energy 164, pp. 298–309. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.077
  69. Neupane, D., Kafle, S., Karki, K.R., Kim, D.H. & Pradhan, P. (2022). Solar and wind energy potential assessment at provincial level in Nepal: Geospatial and economic analysis. Renew Energy, 181, pp. 278–291. DOI:10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.027
  70. Oliveira, C.Y.B., D’Alessandro, E.B., Antoniosi Filho, N.R., Lopes, R.G. & Derner, R.B. (2021). Synergistic effect of growth conditions and organic carbon sources for improving biomass production and biodiesel quality by the microalga Choricystis minor var. minor. Sci Total Environ. 759:143476. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143476
  71. Olsztyńska, I. (2019). Biomass in the fuel mix of the Polish energy and heating sector. Polityka Energ - Energy Policy J. 22, pp. 99–118
  72. Ong, E.S., Rabbani, A.H., Habashy, M.M., Abdeldayem, O.M., Al-Sakkari, E.G. & Rene, E.R. (2021). Palm oil industrial wastes as a promising feedstock for biohydrogen production: A comprehensive review. Environ Pollut. 291:118160. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118160
  73. Openshaw, K. (2010). Biomass energy: Employment generation and its contribution to poverty alleviation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 34, pp. 365–378. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.11.008
  74. Ortolani, A., Persico, G., Drofelnik, J., Jackson, A. & Campobasso, M.S. (2020). Cross-comparative analysis of loads and power of pitching floating offshore wind turbine rotors using frequency-domain Navier-Stokes CFD and blade element momentum theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p 52016
  75. Outlook IIET. (2021). Tracking Progress of Energy Transition in Indonesia. Jakarta Inst Essent Serv Reform
  76. Pichika, S.V.V.S.N., Yadav, R., Geetha Rajasekharan, S., Praveen, H.M. & Inturi, V. (2022). Optimal sensor placement for identifying multi-component failures in a wind turbine gearbox using integrated condition monitoring scheme. Appl Acoust. 187:108505. DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108505
  77. Pitchia Krishnan, B., Mathanbabu, M., Sathyamoorthy, G., Gokulnath, K. & Kumar, L.G.S. (2021). Performance estimation and redesign of horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blade. Mater Today Proc. 46, pp. 8025–8031. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.777
  78. Pourrajabian, A., Dehghan, M. & Rahgozar, S. (2021). Genetic algorithms for the design and optimization of horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) blades: A continuous approach or a binary one? Sustain Energy Technol Assessments, 44:101022. DOI:10.1016/j.seta.2021.101022
  79. Reilly, L.A. (2020). Exploration of Model-Resolution Dependence of Forecasted Wind Hazards for Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations. The University of North Dakota ProQuest Dissertations Publishing,   2020. 28085974.
  80. Saha, R., Bhattacharya, D. & Mukhopadhyay, M. (2022). Enhanced production of biohydrogen from lignocellulosic feedstocks using microorganisms: A comprehensive review. Energy Convers Manag. X 13:100153. DOI:10.1016/j.ecmx.2021.100153
  81. Sameeroddin, M., Deshmukh, M.K.G., Viswa, G. & Sattar, M.A. (2021). Renewable energy: Fuel from biomass, production of ethanol from various sustainable sources by fermentation process. Mater Today Proc. DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.746
  82. Sangeetha, T., Rajneesh, C.P. & Yan, W-M. (2020). 15 - Integration of microbial electrolysis cells with anaerobic digestion to treat beer industry wastewater. [In:] Abbassi, R., Yadav, A.K., Khan, F. & Garaniya, VBT-IMFC for WT (eds). Butterworth-Heinemann, pp. 313–346
  83. Saravanan, A.P., Pugazhendhi, A. & Mathimani, T. (2020). A comprehensive assessment of biofuel policies in the BRICS nations: Implementation, blending target and gaps. Fuel 272:117635. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117635
  84. Sellevold, E., May, T., Gangi, S., Kulakowski, J., McDonnell, I., Hill, D. & Grabowski, M. (2020). Asset tracking, condition visibility and sustainability using unmanned aerial systems in global logistics. Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 8:100234. DOI:10.1016/j.trip.2020.100234
  85. Shakya, S. (2020). Performance analysis of wind turbine monitoring mechanism using integrated classification and optimization techniques. J Artif Intell. 2, pp. 31–41.
  86. Shanmugam, S., Mathimani, T., Rene, E.R., Geo, V.E., Arun, A., Brindhadevi, K. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021a). Biohythane production from organic waste: Recent advancements, technical bottlenecks and prospects. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, pp. 11201–11216. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.132
  87. Shanmugam, S., Sekar, M., Sivaramakrishnan, R., Raj, T., Ong, E.S., Rabbani, A.H., Rene, E.R., Mathimani, T., Brindhadevi, K. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021b). Pretreatment of second and third generation feedstock for enhanced biohythane production: Challenges, recent trends and perspectives. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 46, pp. 11252–11268. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.083
  88. Sharma, M., Singh, J., Baskar, C. & Kumar, A. (2019). A comprehensive review of renewable energy production from biomass-derived bio-oil. Biotechnol J Biotechnol Comput Biol Bionanotechnol, 100:
  89. Sheng, Y., Mathimani, T., Brindhadevi, K., Basha, S., Elfasakhany, A., Xia, C. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2022). Combined effect of CO2 concentration and low-cost urea repletion/starvation in Chlorella vulgaris for ameliorating growth metrics, total and non-polar lipid accumulation and fatty acid composition. Sci Total Environ, 808:151969. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151969
  90. Sitarz-Palczak, E., Kalembkiewicz, J. & Galas, D. (2019). Comparative study on the characteristics of coal fly ash and biomass ash geopolymers. Arch Environ Prot. 45, pp. 126–135. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.126427
  91. Solomin, E. V., Terekhin, A.A., Martyanov, A.S., Shishkov, A.N., Kovalyov, A.A., Ismagilov, D.R. & Ryavkin, G.N. (2022). Horizontal axis wind turbine yaw differential error reduction approach. Energy Convers Manag. 254:115255. DOI:10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115255
  92. Srivastava, R.K., Shetti, N.P., Reddy, K.R., Kwon, E.E., Nadagouda, M.N. & Aminabhavi, T.M. (2021) Biomass utilization and production of biofuels from carbon neutral materials. Environ Pollut. 276:116731. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116731
  93. Sudhakar, M.P., Kumar, B.R., Mathimani, T. & Arunkumar, K. (2019). A review on bioenergy and bioactive compounds from microalgae and macroalgae-sustainable energy perspective. J Clean Prod. 228, pp. 1320–1333. DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.287
  94. Sutherland, D.L., McCauley, J., Labeeuw, L., Ray, P., Kuzhiumparambil, U., Hall, C., Doblin, M. & Nguyen, L.N. (2021). How microalgal biotechnology can assist with the UN Sustainable Development Goals for natural resource management. Curr Res Environ Sustain. 3:100050. DOI:10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100050
  95. Ta, D-T., Lin, C-Y., Ta, T-M-N. & Chu, C-Y. (2020). Biohythane production via single-stage fermentation using gel-entrapped anaerobic microorganisms: Effect of hydraulic retention time. Bioresour Techno.l 317:123986. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123986
  96. Tarique, J., Sapuan, S.M., Khalina, A., Sherwani, S.F.K., Yusuf, J. & Ilyas, R.A. (2021). Recent developments in sustainable arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea Linn) starch biopolymers, fibres, biopolymer composites and their potential industrial applications: A review. J Mater Res Technol. 13, pp. 1191–1219. DOI:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.047
  97. Thanarasu, A., Periyasamy, K. & Subramanian, S. (2022). An integrated anaerobic digestion and microbial electrolysis system for the enhancement of methane production from organic waste: Fundamentals, innovative design and scale-up deliberation. Chemosphere, 287:131886. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131886
  98. Thanigaivel, S., Priya, A.K., Dutta, K., Rajendran, S. & Vasseghian, Y. (2022) Engineering strategies and opportunities of next generation biofuel from microalgae: A perspective review on the potential bioenergy feedstock. Fuel, 312:122827. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122827
  99. Tuan Hoang, A. & Viet Pham, V. (2021). 2-Methylfuran (MF) as a potential biofuel: A thorough review on the production pathway from biomass, combustion progress, and application in engines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 148:111265. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111265
  100. Update AM (2017) Global wind report. Glob Wind Energy Council.
  101. Velusamy, K., Devanand, J., Senthil Kumar, P., Soundarajan, K., Sivasubramanian, V., Sindhu, J. & Vo, D.V.N. (2021). A review on nano-catalysts and biochar-based catalysts for biofuel production. Fuel, 306:121632. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121632
  102. Wang, L., Liu, X. & Kolios, A. (2016). State of the art in the aeroelasticity of wind turbine blades: Aeroelastic modelling. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 64, pp. 195–210. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.007
  103. Whangchai, K., Mathimani, T., Sekar, M., Shanmugam, S., Brindhadevi, K., Hung, T.V., Chinnathambi, A., Alharbi, S.A. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2021). Synergistic supplementation of organic carbon substrates for upgrading neutral lipids and fatty acids contents in microalga. J Environ Chem Eng. 9:105482. DOI:10.1016/j.jece.2021.105482
  104. Wicker, R.J., Kumar, G., Khan, E. & Bhatnagar, A. (2021). Emergent green technologies for cost-effective valorization of microalgal biomass to renewable fuel products under a biorefinery scheme. Chem Eng J. 415:128932. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2021.128932
  105. Wijayasekera, S.C., Hewage, K., Siddiqui, O., Hettiaratchi, P. & Sadiq, R. (2022). Waste-to-hydrogen technologies: A critical review of techno-economic and socio-environmental sustainability. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 47, pp. 5842–5870. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.226
  106. Wójcik, M. & Stachowicz, F. (2019). Influence of sewage sludge conditioning with use of biomass ash on its rheological characteristics. Arch Environ Prot. 45, pp. 92–102. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.126425
  107. Wu, L., Wei, W., Song, L., Woźniak-Karczewska, M., Chrzanowski, L. & Ni, B.J. (2021). Upgrading biogas produced in anaerobic digestion: Biological removal and bioconversion of CO2 in biogas. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 150:111448. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2021.111448
  108. Xu, L., Zhang, Q. & Shi, X. (2019). Stakeholders strategies in poverty alleviation and clean energy access: A case study of China’s PV poverty alleviation program. Energy Policy, 135:111011. DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111011
  109. Yin, Z., Zhu, L., Li, S., Hu, T., Chu, R., Mo, F., Hu, D., Liu, C. & Li, Bin. (2020). A comprehensive review on cultivation and harvesting of microalgae for biodiesel production: Environmental pollution control and future directions. Bioresour Technol. 301:122804. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122804
  110. Zhang, L., Wang, J., Niu, X. & Liu, Z. (2021). Ensemble wind speed forecasting with multi-objective Archimedes optimization algorithm and sub-model selection. Appl Energy, 301:117449. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117449
  111. Zhao, S., Yao, L., He, H., Yiping, Z., Lei, H., Yujia, Z., Yajing, Y. & Jianli, J. (2019). Preparation and environmental toxicity of non-sintered ceramsite using coal gasification coarse slag. Arch Environ Prot. 45, pp. 84–90. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.127983
  112. Zheng, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Z., Jing, Y., Hu, J., He, C. & Lu, C. (2021). A review on biological recycling in agricultural waste-based biohydrogen production: Recent developments. Bioresour Technol. 126595. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126595
  113. Zhuang, X., Liu, J., Wang, C., Zhang, Q. & Ma, L. (2022). A review on the stepwise processes of hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL): Recovery of nitrogen sources and upgrading of biocrude. Fuel, 313:122671. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122671
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

E. Erdiwansyah
ORCID: ORCID
Asri Gani
1 5
ORCID: ORCID
Rizalman Mamat
2
M. Mahidin
ORCID: ORCID
K. Sudhakar
3
ORCID: ORCID
S.M. Rosdi
4
Husni Husin
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh 23111, Indonesia
  2. College of Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Pahang, Malaysia
  3. Energy Centre, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, India
  4. Politeknik Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu
  5. Research Center of Palm Oil and Coconut, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Indonesia
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion (AD) converts organic matter and biomass waste into biogas, making it an environmentally friendly technology to improve energy resources for a wide range of applications. Jerusalem artichoke straw (JAS) has an enriched content of cellulose and exhibits a high potential for methane production. AD-based production of methane can eff ectively utilize waste JAS. This study investigated the AD performance of JAS to explore the enhancement of methane yields by employing a Box-Behnken experimental design (BBD) of response surface methodology (RSM). The overall goal was to identify the optimal levels of pretreatment factors, including HCl concentration, pretreatment time, and pretreatment temperature, for producing optimal biomethane yields from JAS. The highest value of methane production achieved was 256.33 mL g-1VS by using an optimal concentration of HCl as 0.25 M, a pretreatment time of 10 h, and a pretreatment temperature of 25°C. These results inform the future application of JAS in enhanced methane production.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Adeleke, A.O., Latiff, A.A.A., Al-Gheethi, A.A. & Daud, Z. (2017). Optimization of operating parameters of novel composite adsorbent for organic pollutants removal from POME using response surface methodology,Chemosphere, 174, pp. 232-242. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.110.
  2. APHA. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water & wastewater, American Public Health (Association. ed.), Washington DC: American Public Health Association.
  3. Cai, Y., Zhao, X., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., Yuan, X., Zhu, W., Cui, Z. & Wang, X. (2018). Optimization of Fe2+ supplement in anaerobic digestion accounting for the Fe-bioavailability, Bioresource Technology, 250, pp. 163-170. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.151.
  4. Cai, Y., Gallegos, D., Zheng, Z., Stinner, W., Wang, X., Pröter, J. & Schäfer, F. (2021). Exploring the combined effect of total ammonia nitrogen, pH and temperature on anaerobic digestion of chicken manure using response surface methodology and two kinetic models, Bioresource Technology, 337, 125328. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125328.
  5. Ciccoli, R., Sperandei, M., Petrazzuolo, F., Broglia, M., Chiarini, L., Correnti, A., Farneti, A., Pignatelli, V. & Tabacchioni, S. (2018). Anaerobic digestion of the above ground biomass of Jerusalem Artichoke in a pilot plant: Impact of the preservation method on the biogas yield and microbial community,Biomass and Bioenergy, 108, pp. 190-197. DOI:10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.11.003.
  6. Gabriel, S.A, Funmilayo, D.F. & Evariste, G.K. (2020). Process Optimisation of Enzymatic Saccharification of Soaking Assisted and Thermal Pretreated Cassava Peels Waste for Bioethanol Production, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 4, pp. 2409-2420. DOI:10.1007/s12649-018-00562-0.
  7. Gnansounou, E. & Dauriat, A. (2010). Techno-economic analysis of lignocellulosic ethanol: A review, Bioresource Technology, 101, 13, pp. 4980-4991. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.009.
  8. Gunnarsson, I. B., Svensson, S. E., Johansson, E., Karakashev, D. & Angelidaki, I. (2014). Potential of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthustuberosus L.) as a biorefinery crop, Industrial Crops & Products, 56, pp. 231-240. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.03.010.
  9. Günerhan, Ü., Us, E., Dumlu, L., Yılmaz, V., Carrère, H. & Perendeci, A.N. (2020). Impacts of Chemical-Assisted Thermal Pretreatments on Methane Production from Fruit and Vegetable Harvesting Wastes: Process Optimization, Molecules, 23, 25, 500. DOI:10.3390/molecules25030500.
  10. Hassan, T.M., Hossain, M.S., Kassim, M.H., Ibrahim, M., Mohammad, N.F. & Hussin, M. H. (2020). Optimizing the Acid Hydrolysis Process for the Isolation of Microcrystalline Cellulose from Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches Using Response Surface Methods, Waste and Biomass Valorization, 11, 6, pp. 2755-2770. DOI:10.1007/s12649-019-00627-8.
  11. Hossain, M. Z., Suely, A., Yun, J., Zhang, G., Faisal, N. A., Qi, X. & J.N. S. (2019). Recent advances in biological pretreatment of microalgae and lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, pp. 105-128. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.048.
  12. Kafle, Gopi Krishna, Kim & Sang Hun. (2013). Anaerobic treatment of apple waste with swine manure for biogas production: batch and continuous operation, Applied Energy, 103, pp. 61-72. DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.10.018.
  13. Khalid, H., Cai, F., Zhang, J., Zhang, R., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2019). Optimizing key factors for biomethane production from KOH-pretreated switchgrass by response surface methodology, Environmental science and pollution research international, 26, 24, pp. 25084-25091. DOI:10.1007/s11356-019-05615-y.
  14. Kim, M., Kim, B., Nam, K. & Choi, Y. (2018). Effect of pretreatment solutions and conditions on decomposition and anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass in rice straw, Biochemical Engineering Journal, 140, pp. 108-114. DOI:10.1016/j.bej.2018.09.012.
  15. Kim, S., Park, J.M. & Kim, C.H. (2013). Ethanol production using whole plant biomass of Jerusalem artichoke by Kluyveromycesmarxianus CBS1555, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 169, 5, pp. 1531-1545. DOI:10.1007/s12010-013-0094-5.
  16. Kozłowski, K., Dach, J., Lewicki, A., Malińska, K., Isaias Emilio Paulino do Carmo. & Czekała, W. (2019). Potential of biogas production from animal manure in Poland, Archives of Environmental Protection, 45, 3, pp. 98-108. DOI:10.24425/aep.2019.128646.
  17. Kreuger, E., Sipos, B., Zacchi, G., Svensson, S.E., Bjornsson, L. (2011). Bioconversion of industrial hemp to ethanol and methane: The benefits of steam pretreatment and co-production, Bioresource Technology, 102, pp. 3457-3465. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.126.
  18. Li, C., Liu, G., Nges, I. A. & Liu, J. (2016). Enhanced biomethane production from Miscanthuslutarioriparius using steam explosion pretreatment, Fuel, 179, pp. 267-273. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.087.
  19. Liu, J., Yang, M., Zhang, J., Zheng, J., Xu, H., Wang, Y. & Wei, Y. (2018). A comprehensive insight into the effects of microwave-H2O2 pretreatment on concentrated sewage sludge anaerobic digestion based on semi-continuous operation, Bioresource Technology, 256, pp. 118-127. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.126.
  20. Li, W., Zhang, J., Yu, C., Li, Q., Dong, F., Wang, G., Gu, G. & Guo, Z. (2015). Extraction, degree of polymerization determination and prebiotic effect evaluation of inulin from Jerusalem artichoke, Carbohydrate Polymers, 121, pp. 315-319. DOI:10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.055.
  21. Long, X., Shao, H., Liu, L., Liu, L. & Liu, Z. (2016). Jerusalem artichoke: A sustainable biomass feedstock for biorefinery, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54, pp. 1382-1388. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.063.
  22. Monlau, F., Sambusiti, C., Barakat, A., Guo, X.M., Latrille, E., Trably, E., Steyer, J.P., Carrere, H. (2012). Predictive models of biohydrogen and biomethane production based on the compositional and structural features of lignocellulosic materials, Environmental science & technology, 6, 46, pp. 12217-12225. DOI:10.1021/es303132t.
  23. Nges, A. I., Li, C., Wang, B., Xiao, L., Yi, Z., Liu, J. (2016). Physio-chemical pretreatments for improved methane potential of Miscanthuslutarioriparius, Fuel, 166, pp. 29-35. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.108.
  24. Nowicka, A., Zieliński, M., Dębowski, M., Dudek, M. (2021). Progress in the Production of Biogas from Maize Silage after Acid-Heat Pretreatment, Energies, 14, 8018. DOI:10.3390/EN14238018.
  25. Oh, S.Y., Yoo, D.I., Shin, Y., Kim, H.C., Kim, H.Y., Chung, Y.S., Park, W.H. & Youk, J.H. (2005). Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy, Carbohydrate Research, 340, 15, pp. 2376-2391. DOI:10.1016/j.carres.2005.08.007.
  26. Oyekanmi, A.A., Ahmad,A., MohdSetapar, S.H., Alshammari, M.B., Jawaid, M., Hanafiah, M.M., Abdul Khalil, H.P.S. & Vaseashta, A. (2021a). Sustainable Duriozibethinus-Derived Biosorbents for Congo Red Removal from Aqueous Solution: Statistical Optimization, Isotherms and Mechanism Studies, Sustainability, 13, 13264. DOI:10.3390/SU132313264.
  27. Oyekanmi, A.A., Alshammari, M.B., Ibrahim, M.N.M., Hanafiah, M.M., Elnaggar, A.Y., Ahmad, A., Oyediran, A.T., Rosli, M.A., Mohd, Setapar, S.H., Nik, Daud, N.N. & Hussein, E.E. (2021b). Highly Effective Cow Bone Based Biocomposite for the Sequestration of Organic Pollutant Parameter from Palm Oil Mill Effluent in a Fixed Bed Column Adsorption System, Polymers (Basel), 27, 14, 86. DOI:10.3390/polym14010086.
  28. Passos, F., Felix, L., Rocha, H., Pereira, Jde, O., de, Aquino, S. (2016). Reuse of microalgae grown in full-scale wastewater treatment ponds: Thermochemical pretreatment and biogas production, Bioresource Technology, 209, pp. 305-312. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.006.
  29. Passos, F., Ortega, V. & Donoso-Bravo, A. (2017). Thermochemical pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure: Experimental and economic evaluation, Bioresource Technology, 227, pp. 239-246. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.034.
  30. Paudel, S.R., Banjara, S.P., Choi, O.K., Park, K.Y., Kim, Y.M. & Lee, J.W. (2017). Pretreatment of agricultural biomass for anaerobic digestion: Current state and challenges, Bioresource Technology, 245, pp. 1194-1205. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.182.
  31. Pfariso, M., Eugéne, R., Annie, F. A. C & Johann, F. G. (2021). Maximising the Benefits of Enzyme Synergy in the Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) Tuber Residues into Ethanol, Waste and Biomass Valorization.Waste Biomass Valor, 13, pp. 535–546. DOI:10.1007/S12649-021-01488-W.
  32. Pokój, T., Gusiatin, M. Z., Bułkowska, K. & Dubis, B. (2014). Production of biogas using maize silage supplemented with residual glycerine from biodiesel manufacturing, Archives of Environmental Protection, 40, 4, pp. 17-29. DOI:10.2478/aep-2014-0035.
  33. Shen, J., Zhang, J., Wang, W., Liu, G. & Chen, Ch. (2019). Assessment of pretreatment effects on anaerobic digestion of switchgrass: Economics-energy-environment (3E) analysis, Industrial Crops & Products, 145, 111957. DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111957.
  34. Song, Z., Yang, G., Liu, X., Yan, Z., Yuan, Y. & Liao, Y. (2014). Comparison of seven chemical pretreatments of corn straw for improving methane yield by anaerobic digestion, PLoS One, 2, 9. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0093801.
  35. Tian, W., Li, J., Zhu, L., Li, W., He, L., Gu, L., Deng, R., Shi, D., Chai, H. & Gao M. (2021). Insights of enhancing methane production under high-solid anaerobic digestion of wheat straw by calcium peroxide pretreatment and zero valent iron addition, Renewable Energy, 177,pp. 21-32. DOI:10.1016/J.RENENE.2021.06.042.
  36. Van Soest P.J., Robertson J.B. & Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for Dietary Fiber, Neutral Detergent Fiber, and Nonstarch Polysaccharides in Relation to Animal Nutrition, Journal of Dairy Science, 74, 10, pp. 3583–3597. DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
  37. Wang, D.L., Ai, P., Yu, L., Tan, Z.X. & Zhang, Y.L. (2015). Comparing the hydrolysis and biogas production performance of alkali and acid pretreatments of rice straw using two-stage anaerobic fermentation, Biosystems Engineering, 132, pp. 47-55. DOI:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2015.02.007.
  38. Wu, Z., Nguyen, D., Lam, T.Y.C., Zhuang, H., Shrestha, S., Raskin, L., Khanal, S.K. & Lee, P.H. (2021). Synergistic association between cytochrome bd-encoded Proteiniphilum and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-scavenging methanogens in microaerobic-anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass, WaterResearch, 15, 190, 116721. DOI:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116721.
  39. Yang, S., Sun, X., Jiang, X., Wang, L., Tian, J., Li, L., Zhao, M. & Zhong, Q. (2019). Characterization of the Tibet plateau Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) transcriptome by de novo assembly to discover genes associated with fructan synthesis and SSR analysis, Hereditas, 6, 156, 9. DOI:10.1186/s41065-019-0086-8.
  40. Zhang, H., Khalid, H., Li, W., He, Y., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018a). Employing response surface methodology (RSM) to improve methane production from cotton stalk, Environmental science and pollution research international, 25,8, pp. 7618-7624. DOI:10.1007/s11356-017-0682-y.
  41. Zhang, H., Ning, Z., Khalid, H., Zhang, R., Liu, G. & Chen, C. (2018b). Enhancement of methane production from Cotton Stalk using different pretreatment techniques, Scientific reports, 8, 1, 3463. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-21413-x.
  42. Zhang, H., Wang, L., Dai, Z., Zhang, R., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2019). Effect of organic loading, feed-to-inoculum ratio, and pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of tobacco stalks, Bioresource Technology, 298, 122474. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122474.
  43. Zhao, C., Cui, X., Liu, Y., Zhang, R., He, Y., Wang, W., Chen, C. & Liu, G. (2017). Maximization of the methane production from durian shell during anaerobic digestion, Bioresource Technology, 238, pp. 433-438. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.184.
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Yan Meng
1
Yi Li
1
Laisheng Chen
1
Rui Han
1

  1. Qinghai Key Laboratory of Vegetable Genetics and Physiology, Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai 810016, China
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Environmental risk assessment is one of the key tools in environmental engineering. This risk assessment can be qualitative or quantitative and it is based on preliminary studies i.e., baseline study for waste disposal sites. Even though the literature exists on baseline study in general, still there is a lack of guidance regarding development of a site-specific baseline study model for a waste disposal site. This study has two-fold aim, firstly, how to develop site-specific baseline study model for a selected dumping site, and secondly, how this site-specific baseline study can support the environmental engineering via mathematical risk estimation. Mahmood Booti Open Dumping Site (MBODS) is selected to demonstrate the development and application of site-specific baseline study model. This is followed by building a framework that shows how the output of the baseline study can lead to environmental engineering via mathematical risk estimation. The paper provides a mechanism of how to construct a bespoke baseline-study model that is readily useable, avoiding procurement of expensive computer software and yet smoothly connecting with the follow-on stages of the risk assessment. The work presented in this paper can be reproduced repeatedly to create site-specific baseline study models for risk assessment of other waste disposal sites in a cost-effective, consistent and cohesive manner.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Ahmad, S.R., M.S. Khan, A.Q. Khan, S. Ghazi & Ali S. (2012). Sewage Water Intrusion in the Groundwater of Lahore, its Causes and Protections. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 11(5), pp. 484-488.
  2. Alam, A., Tabinda, A. B., Qadir, A., Butt, T. E., Siddique, S., & Mahmood, A. (2017). Ecological Risk Assessment of an Open Dumping Site at Mehmood Booti Lahore, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(21), pp. 17889–17899. DOI:10.1007/s11356-017-9215-y
  3. Alam A., Chaudhry M.N., Ahmad S.R., Batool S.A., Mahmood A., & Al-Ghamdi H.A. (2021a). Application of Easewaste Model for Assessing Environmental Impacts from Solid Waste Landfilling. Archives of Environmental Protection, 47(4), pp. 84 ̶92. DOI:10.24425/Aep.2021.139504
  4. Alam A., Chaudhry M.N., Mahmood A., Ahmad S.R., & Butt T.E. (2021b). Development and Application of Conceptual Framework Model (CFM) for Environmental Risk Assessment of Contaminated Lands. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 28(11), pp. 6167–6177. DOI:10.1016/J.Sjbs.2021.06.069
  5. Alam, A., Chaudhry, M. N., Ahmad, S. R., Ullah, R., Batool, S. A., Butt, T. E., & Mahmood, A. (2022). Application of Landgem Mathematical Model for the Estimation of Gas Emissions From Contaminated Sites. a Case Study of a Dumping Site in Lahore, Pakistan. Environment Protection Engineering, 48(1), pp. 69–81. DOI:10.37190/epe220105
  6. Butt, T. E., Alam, A., Gouda, H. M., Paul, P., & Mair, N. (2017). Baseline Study and Risk Analysis of Landfill Leachate – Current State-of-the-Science of Computer aided approaches. Science of the Total Environment, 580, pp.130–135. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.035
  7. Butt, T. E. Entwistle, J. A. Sagoo, A. S. Akram, H. & Massacci, G. (2019). Combined Risk Assessment for Landfill Gas and Leachate – Informing contaminated land reclamation for appropriate construction projects, The 17th International Waste Management and Landfill Symposium, 30 September - 04 October, Sardinia, Italy
  8. Butt, T. E., Javadi, A. A., Nunns, M. A., & Beal, C. D. (2016). Development of a Conceptual Framework of Holistic risk assessment — Landfill as a Particular Type of Contaminated Land. Science of the Total Environment, 569, pp 815–829. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.152
  9. Butt, T.E., Gouda, H.M., Baloch, M.I., Paul, P., Javadi, A.A., & Alam, A. (2014). Literature review of baseline study for risk analysis. Environmental International, 63, pp.149–162.
  10. Environment Agency. (2011). Waste and Resources Assessment Tool for the Environment (WRATE), Environment Agency. http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/research/commercial/102922.aspx,
  11. EPA (Environment Protection Agency) US. (2004 November). EPA’s Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessment (3MRA) Modelling System – A review by the 3MRA review panel of the EPA science advisory board, EPA-SAB-05-003, EPA.
  12. Environment Agency. (2003). LandSim 2.5 – groundwater risk assessment tool for landfill design. Bristol: Environment Agency.
  13. Gołek-Schild, J. (2018). Municipal Waste Thermal Treatment Installations in Poland – a Source of Energy of Environmental Importance. Zeszyty Naukowe IGSMiE PAN, 105, pp. 147–156. DOI: 10.24425/124370 (in Polish)
  14. Haydar, S., Haider, H., Bari, A. J., & Faragh, A. (2012). Effect of Mehmood Booti Dumping Site in Lahore on Ground Water Quality. Pakistan Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 10, pp 51–56.
  15. Mahmood, Khalid, Batool, S. A., Chaudhry, M. N., & Daud, A. (2015). Evaluating Municipal Solid Waste Dumps using Geographic Information System. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 24(2), pp. 879–886.
  16. Mahmood, K., Batool, S. A., & Chaudhry, M. N. (2016). Studying bio-thermal effects at and around MSW dumps using Satellite Remote Sensing and GIS. Waste Management, 55, pp 118–128. DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.020
  17. Mahmood, A., Eqan, M., Pervez, S., Tabinda, A.B., Yasar, A., Brindhadevi, K. & Pugazhendhi, A. (2020). COVID-19 and frequent use of hand sanitizers; human health and environmental hazards by exposure pathways. Science of the Total Environment, 742, 140561. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140561.
  18. Mahmood, A., Malik, R.N., Syed, J.H., Li, J., Zhang, G. (2015a). Dietary exposure and screening-level risk assessment of Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and Dechloran plus (DP) in wheat, rice, soil and air along two tributaries of the River Chenab, Pakistan. Chemosphere.118, pp. 57–64.
  19. Mahmood, A., Malik, R.N., Li, J., Zhang, G. (2015b). Distribution, congener profile, and risk of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and dechloran plus (DP) in water and sediment from two tributaries of the Chenab River, Pakistan. Archives of Environmental Contaminations. 68(1), pp. 83-91.
  20. Mahmood, A., Malik, R. N., Li, J., & Zhang, G. (2014a). Levels, distribution pattern and ecological risk assessment of organochlorines pesticides (OCPs) in water and sediments from two tributaries of the Chenab River, Pakistan. Ecotoxicology, 23(9), pp. 1713–1721. DOI:10.1007/s10646-014-1332-5
  21. Mahmood, A., Malik, R.N., Li, J. & Zhang, G. (2014b). Levels, distribution profile and risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in water and sediment from two tributaries of River Chenab, Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 21, pp. 7847–7855.
  22. Muhammad, A. M., & Zhonghua, T. (2014). Municipal Solid Waste and its Relation with Groundwater Contamination in. Resrearch Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(8), pp 1551–1560. DOI:10.19026/rjaset.7.431
  23. Policy and Regulations on SWM– Pakistan (2010). Extract from the report "Converting Waste Agricultural Biomass into Energy Source - Legal Framework and Financing Mechanisms for Waste Agricultural Biomass (WAB)/Solid Waste in District Sanghar, Pakistan”
  24. Scientific Software Group. (2012). HELP model, landfill design – risk assessment models and modelling/modelling software. http://www.geology-software.com/help.html, (Viewed January).
  25. Singh, A. & Raj, P. (2018). Segregation of waste at source reduces the environmental hazards of municipal solid waste in Patna, India. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44(4), pp. 96–110. DOI:10.24425/aep.2018.122306
  26. Smol, M., Kulczycka, J., Lelek, Ł., Gorazda, K. & Wzorek, Z. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the integrated technology for the phosphorus recovery from sewage sludge ash (SSA) and fertilizers production. Archives of Environmental Protection, 46(2), pp. 42–52. DOI:10.24425/aep.2020.133473
  27. Szymański, K. & Janowska, B. (2016). Migration of pollutants in porous soil environment. Archives of Environmental Protection, 42(3), pp. 87–95. DOI:10.1515/aep-2016-0026
  28. Golder Associates. (2016). GasSim 2.5, Golder Associates, Website: http://www.gassim.co.uk/Technical_Information.html, (Viewed: 16 August)
  29. Landcare Research (Manaaki Whenua Land care Research – a New Zealand Crown Research Institute). (2003). Risk Assessment Model Reviews, http://www.contamsites.landcarere search.co.nz/risk_assessment_models_reviews.htm
  30. RockWare, 2016. RockWorks 17. Rock Ware Inc. (2004–2016), Website: https//www.rockware.com, (Viewed: 16 August).
  31. Robinson, P. (1997). Geo-technical Engineer. Environment Agency, Pers. Commu.
  32. Vrabel, R., Abas, M., Tanuska, P., Vazan, P., Kebisek, M., Elias, M. & Pavliak, D. (2015). Mathematical Approach to Security Risk Assessment. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 1, pp 1–11. DOI:10.1155/2015/417597
  33. Zhang, Z., Li, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Research on a Risk Assessment Method considering Risk Association. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, ID 9191360, pp. 1-7. DOI:10.1155/2016/9191360
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Asifa Alam
1
Adeel Mahmood
2
M. Nawaz Chaudhry
3
Sajid Rashid Ahmad
1
Noor Ul Safa
2
Huda Ahmed Alghamdi
4
Heba Waheeb Alhamdi
4
Rizwan Ullah
5

  1. College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab Lahore, Pakistan
  2. Department of Environmental Sciences, GC Women University Sialkot, Pakistan
  3. Lahore Schools of Economics, Lahore, Pakistan
  4. Department of Biology, College of Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
  5. Department of Zoology, Mirpur University of Science of Technology (MUST), Mirpur Azad Kashmir, Pakistan
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

Glyphosate is an inhibitor of the shikimate pathway in plants and the most widely used broad-spectrum herbicide. Due to the abundance of its use, there exists a necessity to measure the levels both in humans and in the environment to control the nefarious outcomes of its use. The appropriateness, selectivity, and the specifi city of the employed analytical methods are crucial for the reliability of the resultant deductions when conducting biomonitoring studies on possible exposure to chemicals, whether the samples are biological or environmental in nature. The aim of this study is to evaluate the analytical techniques used to monitor glyphosate levels in human and environmental samples. A detailed web-based literature search was conducted to gather data on the analytical techniques used for glyphosate determination. The most preferred authentic samples are blood, urine, and milk. Environmental samples include plants, soil, and water. Among widely used analytical techniques used to detect glyphosate are High Performance Liquid Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, Gas Chromatography – Tandem Mass Spectrometry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Depending on the sample and study, the most suitable analytical method has been selected. A critical evaluation and publication of pre-existing literature on analytical methods in glyphosate-based herbicide detection will thus aid all relevant researchers in the determination of an appropriate, selective, and specific methodology
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Acquavella, J.F., Alexander, B.H., Mandel, J.S., Gustin, C., Baker, B. & Chapman, P. (2004). Glyphosate biomonitoring for farmers and their families: Results from the farm family exposure study. Environmental Health Perspectives 112, pp. 321–326. DOI:10.1289/ehp.6667
  2. Alexa, E., Bragea, M., Sumalan, R., Lăzureanu, A., Negrea, M. & Iancu, S.(2009). Dynamic of glyphosate mineralization in different soil types. Romanian Agricultural Research, https://www.incda-fundulea.ro/rar/nr26/rar26.11.pdf
  3. Anifandis, G., Katsanaki, K., Lagodonti, G., Messini, C., Simopoulou, M., Dafopoulos, K. & Daponte, A. (2018). The effect of glyphosate on human sperm motility and sperm DNA fragmentation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15. DOI:10.3390/ijerph15061117
  4. Aparicio, V.C., De Gerónimo, E., Marino, D., Primost, J., Carriquiriborde, P. & Costa, J.L. (2013). Environmental fate of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters and soil of agricultural basins. Chemosphere 93, pp. 1866–1873. DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.06.041
  5. Avila-Vazquez, M., Difilippo, F.S., Lean, B. Mac, Maturano, E. & Etchegoyen, A. (2018). Environmental Exposure to Glyphosate and Reproductive Health Impacts in Agricultural Population of Argentina. Journal of Environmental Protection 9, pp. 241–253. DOI:10.4236/jep.2018.93016
  6. Banks, M.L., Kennedy, A.C., Kremer, R.J. & Eivazi, F. (2014). Soil microbial community response to surfactants and herbicides in two soils. Applied Soil Ecology 74, pp. 12–20. DOI:10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.018
  7. Bento, C.P.M., Goossens, D., Rezaei, M., Riksen, M., Mol, H.G.J., Ritsema, C.J. & Geissen, V. (2017). Glyphosate and AMPA distribution in wind-eroded sediment derived from loess soil. Environmental Pollution 220, pp. 1079–1089. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.033
  8. Biagini, R.E., Smith, J.P., Sammons, D.L., MacKenzie, B.A., Striley, C.A.F., Robertson, S.K. & Snawder, J.E. (2004). Development of a sensitivity enhanced multiplexed fluorescence covalent microbead immunosorbent assay (FCMIA) for the measurement of glyphosate, atrazine and metolachlor mercapturate in water and urine. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 379, pp. 368–374. DOI:10.1007/s00216-004-2628-8
  9. Bienvenu, J.F., Bélanger, P., Gaudreau, É., Provencher, G. & Fleury, N. (2021). Determination of glyphosate, glufosinate and their major metabolites in urine by the UPLC-MS/MS method applicable to biomonitoring and epidemiological studies. Anal Bioanal Chem, 413, pp. 2225–2234. DOI:10.1007/S00216-021-03194-X
  10. Bothwell, J.H.F. & Griffin, J.L. (2011). An introduction to biological nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biological Reviews. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00157.x
  11. Bressán, I.G., Llesuy, S.F., Rodriguez, C., Ferloni, A., Dawidowski, A.R., Figar, S.B. & Giménez, M.I. (2021). Optimization and validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of glyphosate in human urine after pre-column derivatization with 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl chloride. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 1171. DOI:10.1016/J.JCHROMB.2021.122616
  12. Brewster, D.W., Warren, J.A. & Hopkins, W.E. (1991). Metabolism of glyphosate in Sprague-Dawley rats: Tissue distribution, identification, and quantitation of glyphosate-derived materials following a single oral dose. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 17, pp. 43–51. DOI:10.1016/0272-0590(91)90237-X
  13. Brito, I.P.F.S., Tropaldi, L., Carbonari, C.A. & Velini, E.D. (2018). Hormetic effects of glyphosate on plants. Pest Management Science. DOI:10.1002/ps.4523
  14. Cantwell, F.F. & Losier, M. (2002). Liquid-liquid extraction. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry, 37, pp. 297–340. DOI:10.1016/S0166-526X(02)80048-4
  15. Cartigny, B., Azaroual, N., Imbenotte, M., Mathieu, D., Vermeersch, G., Goullé, J.P. & Lhermitte, M. (2004). Determination of glyphosate in biological fluids by 1H and 31P NMR spectroscopy, Forensic Science International, pp. 141–145. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.03.025
  16. Cassigneul, A., Benoit, P., Bergheaud, V., Dumeny, V., Etiévant, V., Goubard, Y., Maylin, A., Justes, E. & Alletto, L. (2016). Fate of glyphosate and degradates in cover crop residues and underlying soil: A laboratory study. Science of the Total Environment, 545–546, pp. 582–590. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.052
  17. Chiu, H.Y., Lin, Z.Y., Tu, H.L. & Whang, C.W. (2008). Analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid by capillary electrophoresis with electrochemiluminescence detection. Journal of Chromatography, A, 1177, pp. 195–198. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.042
  18. Connolly, A., Jones, K., Galea, K.S., Basinas, I., Kenny, L., McGowan, P.& Coggins, M. (2017). Exposure assessment using human biomonitoring for glyphosate and fluroxypyr users in amenity horticulture. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 220, pp. 1064–1073. DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.06.008
  19. Curwin, B.D., Hein, M.J., Sanderson, W.T., Striley, C., Heederik, D., Kromhout, H., Reynolds, S.J. & Alavanja, M.C. (2007). Urinary Pesticide Concentrations Among Children, Mothers and Fathers Living in Farm and Non-Farm Households in Iowa. The Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 51, pp. 53–65. DOI:10.1093/ANNHYG
  20. de Villiers, L. & Toit Loots, D. (2013). Using Metabolomics for Elucidating the Mechanisms Related to Tuberculosis Treatment Failure. Current Metabolomics, 1(4), 2013, pp. 306-317.
  21. Delhomme, O., Rodrigues, A., Hernandez, A., Chimjarn, S., Bertrand, C., Bourdat-Deschamps, M., Fritsch, C., Pelosi, C., Nélieu, S. & Millet, M. (2021). A method to assess glyphosate, glufosinate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in soil and earthworms. Journal of Chromatography, A, 1651, 462339. DOI:10.1016/J.CHROMA.2021.462339
  22. Dhamu, V.N., Poudyal, D.C., Telang, C.M., Paul, A., Muthukumar, S. & Prasad, S. (2021). Electrochemically mediated multi‐modal detection strategy‐driven sensor platform to detect and quantify pesticides. Electrochemical Science Advances. DOI:10.1002/elsa.202100128
  23. EFSA, n.d. Glossary | European Food Safety Authority [WWW Document]. EFSA. URL https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/glossary-taxonomy-terms (accessed 5.19.20a).
  24. EFSA, n.d. Why do some scientists say that glyphosate is carcinogenic? DOI:10.2805/654221
  25. El Deeb, S., Wätzig, H., Abd El-Hady, D., Sänger-van de Griend, C. & Scriba, G.K.E. (2016). Recent advances in capillary electrophoretic migration techniques for pharmaceutical analysis (2013–2015). Electrophoresis. DOI:10.1002/elps.201600058
  26. El-Gendy, K., Mosallam, E., Ahmed, N. & Aly, N. (2018). Determination of glyphosate residues in Egyptian soil samples. Analytical Biochemistry, 557, pp. 1–6. DOI:10.1016/j.ab.2018.07.004
  27. European Comission, n.d. EU Pesticides database - European Commission [WWW Document]. URL https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/eu-pesticides-database/public/?event=activesubstance.detail&language=EN&selectedID=1438 (accessed 2.26.20a).
  28. European Comission, n.d. Evaluation of the impact of glyphosate residues in food on human health.
  29. FDA, 2016. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Supporting Document for Action Level for Inorganic Arsenic in Rice Cereals for Infants.
  30. Fluegge, Keith R. & Fluegge, Kyle R. (2015). Glyphosate use predicts ADHD hospital discharges in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Net (HCUPnet): A two-way fixed-effects analysis. PLoS ONE, 10. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0133525
  31. Fontàs, C. & Sanchez, J.M. (2020). Evaluation and optimization of the derivatization reaction conditions of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid with 6‐aminoquinolyl‐N‐hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate using reversed‐phase liquid chromatography. Journal of Separation Science, 43, pp. 3931–3939. DOI:10.1002/jssc.202000645
  32. Gerbreders, V., Krasovska, M., Mihailova, I., Ogurcovs, A., Sledevskis, E., Gerbreders, A., Tamanis, E., Kokina, I. & Plaksenkova, I. (2021). Nanostructure-based electrochemical sensor: Glyphosate detection and the analysis of genetic changes in rye DNA. Surfaces and Interfaces 26, 101332. DOI:10.1016/J.SURFIN.2021.101332
  33. Glass, R.L. (1987). Adsorption of Glyphosate by Soils and Clay Minerals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 35, pp. 497–500. DOI:10.1021/jf00076a013
  34. Gotti, R., Fiori, J., Bosi, S. & Dinelli, G. (2019). Field-amplified sample injection and sweeping micellar electrokinetic chromatography in analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in wheat. Journal of Chromatography, A, 1601, pp. 357–364. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2019.05.013
  35. Grau, D., Grau, N., Gascuel, Q., Paroissin, C., Stratonovitch, C., Lairon, D., Devault, D.A. & di Cristofaro, J. (2022). Quantifiable urine glyphosate levels detected in 99% of the French population, with higher values in men, in younger people, and in farmers. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 29. DOI:10.1007/S11356-021-18110-0
  36. Grebe, S.K.G. & Singh, R.J. (2011). LC-MS/MS in the clinical laboratory - Where to from here? Clinical Biochemist Reviews, 32, pp. 5–31.
  37. Guo, H., Riter, L.S., Wujcik, C.E. & Armstrong, D.W. (2016). Direct and sensitive determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in environmental water samples by high performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography, A, 1443, pp. 93–100. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2016.03.020
  38. Guo, H., Wang, H., Zheng, J., Liu, W., Zhong, J. & Zhao, Q. (2018). Sensitive and rapid determination of glyphosate, glufosinate, bialaphos and metabolites by UPLC–MS/MS using a modified Quick Polar Pesticides Extraction method. Forensic Science International, 283, pp. 111–117. DOI:10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.016
  39. Habekost, A. (2017). Rapid and sensitive spectroelectrochemical and electrochemical detection of glyphosate and AMPA with screen-printed electrodes. Talanta, 162, pp. 583–588. DOI:10.1016/J.TALANTA.2016.10.074
  40. Hottes, E. (2021). Rapid quantification of residual glyphosate in water treated with layered double hydroxides using liquid chromatography / quantificação rápida de glifosato residual em água tratada com hidróxidos duplos lamelares usando cromatografia líquida. Brazilian Journal of Development, 7(3), pp. 20923–20938. DOI:10.34117/bjdv7n3-006
  41. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015. IARC Monograph on Glyphosate.
  42. Jansons, M., Pugajeva, I., Bartkevics, V. & Karkee, H.B. (2021). LC-MS/MS characterisation and determination of dansyl chloride derivatised glyphosate, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), and glufosinate in foods of plant and animal origin. Journal of Chromatography, B, 1177, 122779. DOI:10.1016/J.JCHROMB.2021.122779
  43. Jayasumana, C., Gunatilake, S. & Siribaddana, S. (2015). Simultaneous exposure to multiple heavy metals and glyphosate may contribute to Sri Lankan agricultural nephropathy. BMC Nephrol, 16, 103. DOI:10.1186/s12882-015-0109-2
  44. Jensen, P.K., Wujcik, C.E., McGuire, M.K. & McGuire, M.A. (2016). Validation of reliable and selective methods for direct determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in milk and urine using LC-MS/MS. Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part B, Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes 51, pp. 254–259. DOI:10.1080/03601234.2015.1120619
  45. Ladeira, C. & Viegas, S. (2016). Human Biomonitoring – An overview on biomarkers and their application in Occupational and Environmental Health. Biomonitoring, 3. DOI:10.1515/BIMO-2016-0003
  46. Łozowicka, B. & Kaczyński, P. (2011). Pesticide Residues In Apples (2005–2010) . Archives of Environmental Protection, 37(3), pp. 43-54.
  47. Manno, M., Viau, C., Cocker, J., Colosio, C., Lowry, L., Mutti, A., Nordberg, M. & Wang, S. (2010). Biomonitoring for occupational health risk assessment (BOHRA). Toxicology Letters, 192, pp. 3–16. DOI:10.1016/J.TOXLET.2009.05.001
  48. Marcelo, G., Elise. Smedbol, Annie, C., Louise, H.-E., Michel, L., Laurent, L., Marc, L. & Philippe, J. (2004). Alteration of Plant Physiology by Glyphosate and Its By-Product Aminomethylphosphonic Acid: An Overview. Journal of Experimental Botany, 65, pp. 4691–4703. DOI:10.1093/jxb
  49. Marek, L.J. & Koskinen, W.C. (2014). Simplified analysis of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in water, vegetation and soil by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pest Management Science, 70, pp. 1158–1164. DOI:10.1002/ps.3684
  50. Martin-Reina, J., Dahiri, B., Carbonero-Aguilar, P., Soria-Dıaz, M.E., González, A.G., Bautista, J. & Moreno, I. (2021). Validation of a simple method for the determination of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in human urine by UPLC-MS/MS. Microchemical Journal, 170, 106760. DOI:10.1016/J.MICROC.2021.106760
  51. Masár, M., Hradski, J., Schmid, M.G. & Szucs, R. (2020). Advantages and pitfalls of capillary electrophoresis of pharmaceutical compounds and their enantiomers in complex samples: Comparison of hydrodynamically opened and closed systems. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21, pp. 1–14. DOI:10.3390/ijms21186852
  52. Mcguire, M.K., Mcguire, M.A., Price, W.J., Shafii, B., Carrothers, J.M., Lackey, K.A., Goldstein, D.A., Jensen, P.K. & Vicini, J.L. (2016). Glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid are not detectable in human milk. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 103, pp. 1285–1290. DOI:10.3945/ajcn.115.126854
  53. Meftaul, I.M., Venkateswarlu, K., Dharmarajan, R., Annamalai, P., Asaduzzaman, M., Parven, A. & Megharaj, M. (2020). Controversies over human health and ecological impacts of glyphosate: Is it to be banned in modern agriculture? Environmental Pollution. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372
  54. Moldoveanu, S. & David, V. (2015). The Role of Sample Preparation, [In:] Modern Sample Preparation for Chromatography. Elsevier, pp. 33–49. DOI:10.1016/b978-0-444-54319-6.00002-5
  55. Nagatomi, Y., Yoshioka, T., Yanagisawa, M., Uyama, A. & Mochizuki, N. (2013). Simultaneous LC-MS/MS analysis of glyphosate, glufosinate, and their metabolic products in beer, barley tea, and their ingredients. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 77, pp. 2218–2221. DOI:10.1271/bbb.130433
  56. Ohara, T., Yoshimoto, T., Natori, Y. & Ishii, A. (2021). A simple method for the determination of glyphosate, glufosinate and their metabolites in biological specimen by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry: an application for forensic toxicology. Nagoya Journal of Medical Science, 83, 567. DOI:10.18999/NAGJMS.83.3.567
  57. Okada, E., Coggan, T., Anumol, T., Clarke, B. & Allinson, G. (2019). A simple and rapid direct injection method for the determination of glyphosate and AMPA in environmental water samples. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 411, pp. 715–724. DOI:10.1007/s00216-018-1490-z
  58. Okada, E., Costa, J.L. & Bedmar, F. (2016). Adsorption and mobility of glyphosate in different soils under no-till and conventional tillage. Geoderma, 263, pp. 78–85. DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.09.009
  59. Philipp Schledorn, M.K. (2014). Detection of Glyphosate Residues in Animals and Humans. Journal of Environmental & Analytical Toxicology, 04. DOI:10.4172/2161-0525.1000210
  60. Phillips, T.M. (2018). Recent advances in CE and microchip-CE in clinical applications: 2014 to mid-2017. Electrophoresis. DOI:10.1002/elps.201700283
  61. Poiger, T., Buerge, I.J., Bächli, A., Müller, M.D. & Balmer, M.E. (2017). Occurrence of the herbicide glyphosate and its metabolite AMPA in surface waters in Switzerland determined with on-line solid phase extraction LC-MS/MS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24, pp. 1588–1596. DOI:10.1007/s11356-016-7835-2
  62. PubChem, n.d. Glyphosate | C3H8NO5P - PubChem [WWW Document]. URL https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Glyphosate#section=Solubility (accessed 7.31.21).
  63. Rendón-Von Osten, J. & Dzul-Caamal, R. (2017). Glyphosate Residues in Groundwater, Drinking Water and Urine of Subsistence Farmers from Intensive Agriculture Localities: A Survey in Hopelchén, Campeche, Mexico. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Article. DOI:10.3390/ijerph14060595
  64. Ruiz, P., Dualde, P., Coscollà, C., Fernández, S.F., Carbonell, E. & Yusà, V. (2021). Biomonitoring of glyphosate and AMPA in the urine of Spanish lactating mothers. Sci Total Environ, 801. DOI:10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.149688
  65. Sadkowska, J., Caban, M., Chmielewski, M., Stepnowski, P. & Kumirska, J. (2019). The use of gas chromatography for determining pharmaceutical residues in clinical, cosmetic, food and environmental samples in the light of the requirements of sustainable development. Archives of Environmental Protection, 45, pp. 42–49. DOI:10.24425/AEP.2019.124829
  66. Sakamoto, S., Putalun, W., Vimolmangkang, S., Phoolcharoen, W., Shoyama, Y., Tanaka, H. & Morimoto, S. (2018). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the quantitative/qualitative analysis of plant secondary metabolites. Journal of Natural Medicines. DOI:10.1007/s11418-017-1144-z
  67. Scandurra, A., Censabella, M., Gulino, A., Grimaldi, M.G. & Ruffino, F. (2022). Gold nanoelectrode arrays dewetted onto graphene paper for selective and direct electrochemical determination of glyphosate in drinking water. Sens Biosensing Res, 36, 100496. DOI:10.1016/J.SBSR.2022.100496
  68. Sidoli, P., Baran, N. & Angulo-Jaramillo, R. (2016). Glyphosate and AMPA adsorption in soils: laboratory experiments and pedotransfer rules. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, pp. 5733–5742. DOI:10.1007/s11356-015-5796-5
  69. Steinborn, A., Alder, L., Michalski, B., Zomer, P., Bendig, P., Martinez, S.A., Mol, H.G.J., Class, T.J. & Costa Pinheiro, N. (2016). Determination of Glyphosate Levels in Breast Milk Samples from Germany by LC-MS/MS and GC-MS/MS. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 64, pp. 1414–1421. DOI:10.1021/acs.jafc.5b05852
  70. Sviridov, A. V., Shushkova, T. V., Ermakova, I.T., Ivanova, E. V., Epiktetov, D.O. & Leontievsky, A.A. (2015). Microbial degradation of glyphosate herbicides (review). Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology, 51, pp. 188–195. DOI:10.1134/S0003683815020209
  71. Tsao, Y.C., Lai, Y.C., Liu, H.C., Liu, R.H. & Lin, D.L. (2016). Simultaneous determination and quantitation of paraquat, diquat, glufosinate and glyphosate in postmortem blood and urine by LC-MS-MS. Journal of Analytical Toxicology, 40, pp. 427–436. DOI:10.1093/jat/bkw042
  72. Valle, A.L., Mello, F.C.C., Alves-Balvedi, R.P., Rodrigues, L.P. & Goulart, L.R. (2019). Glyphosate detection: methods, needs and challenges. Environmental Chemistry Letters. DOI:10.1007/s10311-018-0789-5
  73. Van Bruggen, A.H.C., He, M.M., Shin, K., Mai, V., Jeong, K.C., Finckh, M.R. & Morris, J.G. (2018). Environmental and health effects of the herbicide glyphosate. Science of the Total Environment. DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.309
  74. Von Ehrenstein, O.S., Ling, C., Cui, X., Cockburn, M., Park, A.S., Yu, F., Wu, J. & Ritz, B. (2019). Prenatal and infant exposure to ambient pesticides and autism spectrum disorder in children: Population based case-control study. The BMJ, 364. DOI:10.1136/bmj.l962
  75. Yadav, P. & Zelder, F. (2021). Detection of glyphosate with a copper(ii)-pyrocatechol violet based GlyPKit. Analytical Methods, 13, pp. 4354–4360. DOI:10.1039/D1AY01168E
  76. Zhang, C., Hu, X., Luo, J., Wu, Z., Wang, L., Li, B., Wang, Y. & Sun, G. (2015). Degradation dynamics of glyphosate in different types of citrus orchard soils in China. Molecules, 20, pp. 1161–1175. DOI:10.3390/molecules20011161
  77. Zhang, H., Liu, X., Huo, Z., Sun, H., Zhang, F. & Zhu, B. (2021). An ion chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (IC-MS/MS) method for glyphosate and amino methyl phosphoric acid in serum of occupational workers. Microchemical Journal, 170. DOI:10.1016/J.MICROC.2021.106614
  78. Zoller, O., Rhyn, P., Zarn, J.A. & Dudler, V. (2020). Urine glyphosate level as a quantitative biomarker of oral exposure. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 228, 113526. DOI:10.1016/J.IJHEH.2020.113526
  79. Zouaoui, K., Dulaurent, S., Gaulier, J., Moesch, C. & Lachâtre, G. (2013). Determination of glyphosate and AMPA in blood and urine from humans: about 13 cases of acute intoxication. Forensic Sci Int, 226. DOI:10.1016/J.FORSCIINT.2012.12.010
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Kumsal Kocadal
1
ORCID: ORCID
Fehmi Burak Alkas
2
ORCID: ORCID
Dilek Battal
2 3
ORCID: ORCID
Sahan Saygi
3

  1. Near East University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Cyprus
  2. Mersin University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Cyprus
  3. Near East University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Toxicology, Turkey
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The work describes the methodology and results of analysis for the consequences assessment of eruption from Cumbre Vieja volcano in Canary Islands. The preliminary analysis of dispersion of emitted pollutants was performed using Lagrangian trajectories model. To estimate long-term outcomes of eruption in terms of deposition and concentration of eruption products the Eulerian model of air dispersion was used. The model uses data from Global Forecasting System meteorological model launched at the NCEP-NOAA centre. The average concentration and deposition of sulfur compounds as well as the probability and time of the pollution cloud reaching all European capitals were examined. In 90 days a cloud of pollutants (SO2, volcanic ashes) spread over the northern hemisphere. Pollution reached Africa, North Sea and Europe. With an average emission of 15,000 tons of SO2/day, the maximum calculated deposition to the Earth’s surface reached 0.8g/m2, while overall deposition – 35 kilotons in the domain area.
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Bartnicki, J., Haakenstad, H. & Benedictow, A. (2010). Atmospheric transport and deposition of radioactive debris to Norway in case of a hypothetical accident in Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant. Met.no report 1/2010. Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo.
  2. Bouallegue, Z.B., Theis, S.E. & Gebhardt, C. (2013). Enhancing COSMO-DE ensemble forecasts by inexpensive techniques. Meteorologische Zeitschrift 22, 1, pp. 49–59. DOI:10.1127/0941-2948/2013/0374
  3. Bott, A. (1989) A positive definite advection scheme obtained by nonlinear renormalization of the advective fluxes. Mon. Wea. Rev. 117, pp. 1006-1015, DOI:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<1006:APDASO>2.0.CO;2
  4. Businger, S., Huff, R., Horton, K., Sutton, A.J. & Elias, T. (2015). Observing and forecasting vog dispersion from Kīlauea Volcano, Hawaii. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 96, pp. 1667-1686. DOI:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00150.1
  5. Carboni, E., Grainger, R.G., Mather, T.A., Pyle, D.M., Thomas, G.E., Siddans, R., Smith, A.J.A., Dudhia, A., Koukouli, M.E. & Balis, D. (2016). The vertical distribution of volcanic SO2 plumes measured by IASI. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, pp. 4343–4367, DOI:10.5194/acp-16-4343-2016
  6. Chen, M., Wang, W. & Kumar, A. (2013). Lagged ensembles, forecast configuration, and seasonal predictions. Mon. Wea. Rev. 141, no. 10, pp. 3477-3497. DOI:10.1175/MWR-D-12-00184.1
  7. DelSole, T., Trenary, L. & Tippett, M.K. (2017). The Weighted-Average Lagged Ensemble. J. Adv. Model Earth Syst. 9, 7, pp. 2739–2752. DOI: 10.1002/2017MS001128.
  8. Draxler, R.R. (2007). Demonstration of a global modeling methodology to determine the relative importance of local and long-distance sources. Atmos. Env. 41, pp. 776-789, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.08.052
  9. Eckhardt, S., Prata, A.J., Seibert, P., Stebel, K. & Stohl, A. (2008). Estimation of the vertical profile of sulfur dioxide injection into the atmosphere by a volcanic eruption using satellite column measurements and inverse transport modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, pp. 3881–3897, DOI:10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008
  10. Juda-Rezler, K. (2010). New challenges in air quality and climate modeling. Arch. Environ. Prot., 36, 1, pp. 3-28
  11. Kryza, M., Błaś, M., Dore, A.J. & Sobik, M. (2010). Fine-Resolution Modeling of Concentration and Deposition of Nitrogen and Sulphur Compounds for Poland – Application of the FRAME Model. Arch. Environ. Prot., 36, 1, pp. 49-61
  12. Lax, P.D. (2013). Stability of Difference Schemes, [In:] de Moura, C.A. & Kubrusly C.S. (eds.) The Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy (CFL) Condition 80 Years After Its Discovery. ISBN 978-0-8176-8393-1, DOI 10.1007/978-0-8176-8394-8 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London
  13. Lu, C., Yuan, H., Schwartz, B.E. & Benjamin, S.G. (2007). Short-range numerical weather prediction using time-lagged ensembles. Weather and Forecasting 22, 3, pp. 580–595. DOI:10.1175/WAF999.1
  14. Mazur, A. (2008) Unified model for atmospheric transport of pollutants over Poland. Doctoral Dissertation. (in Polish) Warsaw, IMGW.
  15. Mazur, A., Bartnicki, J. & Zwoździak, J. (2014). Operational model for atmospheric transport and deposition of air pollution. Ecol. Chem. Eng. – S 21, 3, pp. 385-400, DOI: 10.2478/eces-2014-0028.
  16. Mazur, A. (2016). Air transport of pollutants between Poland and neighbouring countries in 2008–2012 – assessment of the balance, based on the simulation of atmospheric dispersion. Part II – nitrogen and sulphur compounds. Sci. Rev. Eng. Env. Sci., 25(4), 472–482 (in Polish)
  17. Mazur, A. (2019). Hypothetical Accident In Polish Nuclear Power Plant. Worst Case Scenario for Main Polish Cities. Ecol. Chem. Eng. – S 26, 1, pp. 9-28, DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0001
  18. NASA (2021) NASA Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory Global Sulfur Dioxide Monitoring Home Page, (https://so2.gsfc.nasa.gov/volcano_past.html, (21.12.2021))
  19. NOMADS (2021). NOAA Operational Model Archive and Distribution System, (https://nomads.ncep.noaa.gov (21.12.2021))
  20. Nordlund, G., Rossi, J., Valkama, I. & Seppo, V. (1998). Probabilistic trajectory and dose analysis for Finland due to hypothetical radioactive release at Sosnovy Bor. Research Note 847. Tech. Res. Centre of Finland. Espoo. ISBN 951-38-3106.
  21. Pongkiatkul, P. & Kim Oanh, N.T. (2007). Assessment of potential long-range transport of particulate air pollution using trajectory modeling and monitoring data. Atmos. Res., 85, pp. 3-17, DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2006.10.003.
  22. Schaettler, U. & Blahak, U. (2013). A Description of the Nonhydrostatic Regional COSMO-Model. Part V: Initial and Boundary Data for the COSMO-Model. Publisher: Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach. DOI: 10.5676/DWD pub/nwv/cosmo-doc_5.00_V.
  23. De Visscher, A. (2014). Air Dispersion Modeling. Foundations and Applications. ISBN 978-1-118-07859-4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
  24. Yuan, H., Lu, C., McGinley, J.A., Schultz, P.J., Jamison, B.D., Wharton, L. & Anderson, C.J. (2009). Evaluation of short-range quantitative precipitation forecasts from a time-lagged multimodel ensemble. Weather and Forecasting 24, 1, pp. 18–38. DOI:10.1175/2008WAF2007053.1
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Andrzej Mazur
1
ORCID: ORCID

  1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute, Poland
Download PDF Download RIS Download Bibtex

Abstract

The aim of the study is to present the FAPPS (Forecasting of Air Pollution Propagation System) based on the CALPUFF puff dispersion model, used for short-term air quality forecasting in Krakow and Lesser Poland. The article presents two methods of operational air quality forecasting in Krakow. The quality of forecasts was assessed on the basis of PM10 concentrations measured at eight air quality monitoring stations in 2019 in Krakow. Apart from the standard quantitative forecast, a qualitative forecast was presented, specifying the percentage shares of the city area with PM10 concentrations in six concentration classes. For both methods, it was shown how the adjustment of the emissions in the FAPPS system to changes in emissions related to the systemic elimination of coal furnaces in Krakow influenced the quality of forecasts. For standard forecasts, after the emission change on June 7, 2019, the average RMSE value decreased from 23.9 μg/m3 to 14.9 μg/m3, the average FB value changed from -0.200 to -0.063, and the share of correct forecasts increased from 0.74 to 0.91. For qualitative forecasts, for the entire year 2019 and separately for the periods from January to March and October to December, Hit Rate values of 5.43, 2.18 and 3.48 were obtained, the False Alarm Ratios were 0.28, 0.24 and 0,26, and the Probability of Detection values were 0.66, 0.75, and 0.74. The presented results show that the FAPPS system is a useful tool for modelling air pollution in urbanized and industrialized areas with complex terrain
Go to article

Bibliography

  1. Chlebowska-Styś, A., Kobus, D., Zathey, M. & Sówka, I. (2019). The impact of road transport
  2. on air quality in selected Polish cities, Ecol. Chem Eng. A. 26(1–2), pp.19–36
  3. CIBSE TM41 (2006). Degree-days: theory and application, The Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers 222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS
  4. Dresser, A.L. & Huizer, R.D. (2011). CALPUFF and AERMOD model validation study in the near field: Martins Creek revisited, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 61, pp. 647–659. DOI:10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647.
  5. EEA Report 9/2020 (2020). Air quality in Europe — 2020 report (https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/air-quality-in-europe-2020-report/(25.02.2022)).
  6. EMEP/CEIP (2018). Present state of emission data; https://www.ceip.at/status-of-reporting-and-review-results/2019-submissions
  7. ETC/ACM (2013). Technical Paper 2013/11 (R. Rouil, B. Bessagnet, eds). How to start with PM modelling for air quality assessment and planning relevant to AQD
  8. Gawuc, L., Szymankiewicz, K., Kawicka, D., Mielczarek, E., Marek, K., Soliwoda, M. & Maciejewska, J. (2021). Bottom–Up Inventory of Residential Combustion Emissions in Poland for National Air Quality Modelling: Current Status and Perspectives, Atmosphere 12, no. 11: 1460. DOI:10.3390/atmos12111460
  9. Ghannam, K. & El-Fadel, M. (2013). Emissions characterization and regulatory compliance at an industrial complex: an integrated MM5/CALPUFF approach. Atmos. Environ. 69, pp.156–169. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.12.022.
  10. GMES Mapping Guide for a European Urban Atlas v.1.01, (2010). (http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data )
  11. Godlowska, J., Tomaszewska, A.M., Kaszowski, W. .& Hajto, M. J. (2012) Comparison between modelled (ALADIN/MM5/CALMET) and measured (SODAR) planetary boundary layer height. in: Proc. ICUC8 – 8th International Conference on Urban Climates, 6-10.08.2012, Dublin, Ireland, 255 (http://smog.imgw.pl/pdf/255.pdf )
  12. Godłowska, J. (2019). The impact of meteorological conditions on air quality in Krakow. Comparative research and an attempt at a model approach. Seria: Monografie Instytutu Meteorologii I Gospodarki Wodnej Państwowego Instytutu Badawczego, p. 104, ISBN: 978-83-64979-29-3 9 (In Polish) (https://www.imgw.pl/sites/default/files/2019-12/wplyw-warunkow-meteorologicznych-na-jakosc-powietrza-w-krakowie.pdf )
  13. Godłowska, J. & Kaszowski, W. (2019): Testing various morphometric methods to determine vertical profile of wind speed in Krakow, Poland, Bound.-Layer Meteorol., 172, pp.107-132 DOI:10.1007/s10546-019-00440-9
  14. Grimmond, C. S. B. & Oke, T. R. (1999). Aerodynamic Properties of Urban Areas Derived from Analysis of Surface Form, J. Appl. Meteorol.38, 1262- 1292. DOI:10.1175/1520-0450(1999)038<1262:APOUAD>2.0.CO;2
  15. Holnicki, P., Kałuszko, A., Nahorski, Z., Stankiewicz, K. & Trapp, W. (2017). Air quality modeling for Warsaw agglomeration, Arch. Environ. Prot. 43, pp. 48–64. DOI:10.1515/aep-2017-0005 .
  16. Jiřík, V., Hermanová, B., Dalecká, A., Pavlíková, I., Bitta, J., Jančík, P., Ośródka, L., Krajny, E., Sładeczek, F., Siemiątkowski, G., Kiprian, K. & Głodek Bucyk, E. (2020). Wpływ zanieczyszczenia powietrza na zdrowie ludności w obszarze polsko-czeskiego pogranicza. Opole 2020, ISBN 978-83-7342-714-3 (In Polish and Czech)
  17. Juda-Rezler, K. (2010) New challenges in air quality and climate modeling. Arch. Environ. Prot. 36, pp.3–28.
  18. Juginović, A., Vuković, M., Aranza, I. et al. (2021). Health impacts of air pollution exposure from 1990 to 2019 in 43 European countries. Sci Rep 11, 22516. DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-01802-5.
  19. Kanda, M, Inagaki, A, Miyamoto, T, Gryschka, M. & Raasch, S. (2013). A new aerodynamic parametrization for real urban surfaces. Bound.-Layer Meteorol.148, pp.357–377.DOI:10.1007/s10546-013-9818-x
  20. Oleniacz, R. & Rzeszutek, M. (2018). Intercomparison of the CALMET/CALPUFFmodeling system for selected horizontal grid resolutions at a local scale: a case study of the MSWI Plant in Krakow, Poland. Appl. Sci. 8, 1–19. DOI:10.3390/app8112301.
  21. PSU/NCAR Mesoscale Modeling System (https://a.atmoswashington.edu/~ovens/newwebpage/mm5-home.html (26.02.2022))
  22. Rood, A.S. (2014). Performance evaluation of AERMOD, CALPUFF, and legacy air dispersion models using the Winter Validation Tracer Study dataset. Atmos. Environ. 89, pp.707–720. DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.02.054.
  23. Rzeszutek M. (2019). Parameterization and evaluation of the CALMET/CALPUFF model system in near-field and complex terrain– Terrain data, grid resolution and terrain adjustment method, Sci. Total Environ 689, pp.31–46, DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.379
  24. Samek, L., Styszko, K., Stegowski, Z., Zimnoch, M., Skiba, A., Turek-Fijak, A., Gorczyca, Z., Furman,P., Kasper-Giebl, A., Rozanski, K. (2021) Comparison of PM10 Sources at Traffic and Urban Background Sites Based on Elemental, Chemical and Isotopic Composition: Case Study from Krakow, Southern Poland. Atmosphere, 12, 1364. DOI:10.3390/atmos12101364
  25. Scire, J. S., Robe, F. R., Fernau, M. E. & Yamartino R. J. (2000a). A user’s guide for the CALMET Meteorological Model (Version 5.0). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA
  26. Scire, J. S., Strimaitis, D. G. & Yamartino R.J. (2000b). A user’s guide for the CALPUFF Dispersion Model (Version 5.0). Earth Tech, Inc., Concord, MA
  27. Schlünzen, K.H. & Sokhi, R.S. (2008). Overview of Tools And Methods For Meteorological And Air Pollution Mesoscale Model Evaluation And User Training. Joint Report by WMO and COST Action 728, GURME. pp. 116.
  28. Termonia, P., Fischer, C., Bazile, E., Bouyssel, F., Brožková, R., Bénard, P., Bochenek, B., Degrauwe, D., Derková, M., El Khatib, R., Hamdi, R., Mašek, J., Pottier, P., Pristov, N., Seity, Y., Smolíková, P., Španiel, O., Tudor, M., Wang, Y., Wittmann, C.& Joly, A. (2018). The ALADIN System and its canonical model configurations AROME CY41T1 and ALARO CY40T1 . Geosci. Model Dev., 11, pp.257–281. DOI:10.5194/gmd-11-257-2018
  29. Thunis, P., Miranda, A., Baldasano, J.M., Blond, N., Douros, J., Graff, A., Janssen, S., Juda-Rezler, K., Karvosenoja, N., Maffeis, G., Martilli, A., Rasoloharimahefa, M., Real, E., Viaene, P., Volta, M. & White, L. (2016). Overview of current regional and local scale air quality modelling practices: assessment and planning tools in the EU. Environ. Sci. Policy. 65, pp.13–21. DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.013.
  30. WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. (2021). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021
  31. Yessad K. (2019). Basics about ARPEGE/IFS, ALADIN and AROME in the cycle 46t1r1 of ARPEGE/IFS (http://www.umr-cnrm.fr/gmapdoc/IMG/pdf/ykarpbasics46t1r1.pdf /28.02.2022
Go to article

Authors and Affiliations

Jolanta Godłowska
1
ORCID: ORCID
Kamil Kaszowski
1
Wiesław Kaszowski
1

  1. Institute of Meteorology and Water Management – National Research Institute, Poland

Instructions for authors

Archives of Environmental Protection
Instructions for Authors

Archives of Environmental Protection is a quarterly published jointly by the Institute of Environmental Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences and the Committee of Environmental Engineering of the Polish Academy of Sciences. Thanks to the cooperation with outstanding scientists from all over the world we are able to provide our readers with carefully selected, most interesting and most valuable texts, presenting the latest state of research in the field of engineering and environmental protection.

Scope
The Journal principally accepts for publication original research papers covering such topics as:
– Air quality, air pollution prevention and treatment;
– Wastewater treatment and utilization;
– Waste management;
– Hydrology and water quality, water treatment;
– Soil protection and remediation;
– Transformations and transport of organic/inorganic pollutants in the environment;
– Measurement techniques used in environmental engineering and monitoring;
– Other topics directly related to environmental engineering and environment protection.

The Journal accepts also authoritative and critical reviews of the current state of knowledge in the topic directly relating to the environment protection.

If unsure whether the article is within the scope of the Journal, please send an abstract via e-mail to: aep@ipispan.edu.pl

Preparation of the manuscript
The following are the requirements for manuscripts submitted for publication:
• The manuscript (with illustrations, tables, abstract and references) should not exceed 20 pages. In case the manuscript exceeds the required number of pages, we suggest contacting the Editor.
• The manuscript should be written in good English.
• The manuscript ought to be submitted in doc or docx format in three files:
– text.doc – file containing the entire text, without title, keywords, authors names and affiliations, and without tables and figures;
– figures.doc – file containing illustrations with legends;
– tables.doc – file containing tables with legends;
• The text should be prepared in A4 format, 2.5 cm margins, 1.5 spaced, preferably using Time New Roman font, 12 point. Thetext should be divided into sections and subsections according to general rules of manuscript editing. The proposed place of tables and figures insertion should be marked in the text.
• Legends in the figures should be concise and legible, using a proper font size so as to maintain their legibility after decreasing the font size. Please avoid using descriptions in figures, these should be used in legends or in the text of the article. Figures should be placed without the box. Legends should be placed under the figure and also without box.
• Tables should always be divided into columns. When there are many results presented in the table it should also be divided into lines.
• References should be cited in the text of an article by providing the name and publication year in brackets, e.g. (Nowak 2019). When a cited paper has two authors, both surnames connected with the word “and” should be provided, e.g. (Nowak and Kowalski 2019). When a cited paper has more than two author, surname of its first author, abbreviation ‘et al.’ and publication year should be provided, e.g. (Kowalski et al. 2019). When there are more than two publications cited in one place they should be divided with a coma, e.g. (Kowalski et al. 2019, Nowak 2019, Nowak and Kowalski 2019). Internet sources should be cited like other texts – providing the name and publication year in brackets.
• The Authors should avoid extensive citations. The number of literature references must not exceed 30 including a maximum of 6 own papers. Only in review articles the number of literature references can exceed 30.
• References should be listed at the end of the article ordered alphabetically by surname of the first author. References should be made according to the following rules:

1. Journal:
Surnames and initials. (publication year). Title of the article, Journal Name, volume, number, pages, DOI.
For example:

Nowak, S.W., Smith, A.J. & Taylor, K.T. (2019). Title of the article, Archives of Environmental Protection, 10, 2, pp. 93–98. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.126330

If the article has been assigned DOI, it should be provided and linked with the website on which it is made available.

2. Book:
Surnames and initials. (publication year). Title, Publisher, Place and publishing year.
For example:

Kraszewski, J. & Kinecki, K. (2019). Title of book, Work & Studies, Zabrze 2019.

3. Edited book:

Surnames and initials of text authors. (publishing year). Title of cited chapter, in: Title of the book, Surnames and
initials of editor(s). (Ed.)/(Eds.). Publisher, Place, pages.
For example:

Reynor, J. & Taylor, K.T. (2019). Title of chapter, in: Title of the cited book, Kaźmierski, I. & Jasiński, C. (Eds.). Work & Studies, Zabrze, pp. 145–189.

4. Internet sources:
Surnames and initials or the name of the institution which published the text. (publication year). Title, (website address (accessed on)).
For example:

Kowalski, M. (2018). Title, (http://www.krakow.pios.gov.pl/publikacje/2009/ (03.12.2018)).

5. Patents:

Orszulik, E. (2009). Palenisko fluidalne, Patent polski: nr PL20070383311 20070910 z 16 marca 2009.
Smith, I.M. (1988). U.S. Patent No. 123,445. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

6. Materials published in language other than English:
Titles of cited materials should be translated into English. Information of the language the materials were published in should be provided at the end.
For example:

Nowak, S.W. & Taylor, K.T. (2019). Title of article, Journal Name, 10, 2, pp. 93–98. DOI: 10.24425/aep.2019.126330. (in Polish)

Not more than 30 references should be cited in the original research paper.


Submission of the manuscript
By submitting the manuscript Author(s) warrant(s) that the article has not been previously published and is not under consideration by another journal. Authors claim responsibility and liability for the submitted article.
The article is freely available and distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License (CC BY SA 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the article is properly cited.


© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International Public License (CC BY SA 4.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the article is properly cited.


The manuscripts should be submitted on-line using the Editorial System available at http://www.editorialsystem.com/aep.

Review Process
All the submitted articles are assessed by the Editorial Board. If positively assessed by at least two editors, Editor in Chief, along with department editors selects two independent reviewers from recognized authorities in the discipline.
Review process usually lasts from 1 to 4 months.
Reviewers have access to PUBLONS platform which integrates into Bentus Editorial System and enables adding reviews to their personal profile.
After completion of the review process Authors are informed of the results and – if both reviews are positive – asked to correct the text according to reviewers’ comments. Next, the revised work is verified by the editorial staff for factual and editorial content.

Acceptance of the manuscript

The manuscript is accepted for publication on grounds of the opinions of independent reviewers and approval of Editorial Board. Authors are informed about the decision and also asked to pay processing charges and to send completed declaration of the transfer of copyright to the editorial office.

Proofreading and Author Correction
All articles published in the Archives of Environmental Protection go through professional proofreading process. If there are too many language errors that prevent understanding of the text, the article is sent back to Authors with a request to correct the indicated fragments or – in extreme cases – to re-translate the text.
After proofreading the manuscript is prepared for publishing. The final stage of the publishing process is Author correction. Authors receive a page proof copy of the article with a request to make final corrections.

Article publication charges


The publication fee in the Journal of an article up to 20 pages is 520 EUR/2500 zł

Payments in Polish zlotys
Bank BGK
Account no.: 20 1130 1091 0003 9111 7820 0001

Payments in Euros
Bank BGK
Account no.: 20 1130 1091 0003 9111 7820 0001
IBAN: PL 20 1130 1091 0003 9111 7820 0001
SWIFT: GOSKPLPW

Authors are kindly requested to inform the editorial office of making payment for the publication, as well as to send all necessary data for issuing an invoice
 

Peer-review Procedure

The reviewing procedure for papers published in Archives of Environmental Protection

1) After accepting the paper as matching to the scope of the Journal Editor-in-Chief with Section Editors choose two independent Reviewers (authorities in the domain/discipline). The chosen Reviewers (from professors and senior academic staff members) have to guarantee:

  • autonomous opinion,
  • the lack of interests conflict – especially the lack of personal and business relations with the Authors of the paper,
  • the preservation of confidentiality about the paper content and the Reviewer opinion about the paper.

2) After the Reviewers selection, Assistant Editor send them (via e-mail) requests to review the paper. Reviewers receive the full text of the paper (without Author personal data) qualified for the reviewing process and referee form, sometimes supplemented with the additional questions connected with the article. In the e-mail Assistant Editor also determine the extent of the review and the deadline (usually a month).

3) The personal data of Reviewers are not open (double-blind review). It can be declassify only on Author’s special request and after the Reviewer agreement. It sometimes happen when the review outcome is: manuscript rejection or when the paper contain controversial issues.

4) The reviewer send the review to the Editorial Office via e-mail. After receiving the review the Assistant Editor:

  • inform Authors about it (in the case of the review without corrections or when there are only small, editorial changes needed),
  • send the reviews to Authors. Authors have to correct the paper according to Reviewers comment and prepare the reply to Reviewers,
  • send the paper corrected by Authors to Reviewers again – when Reviewer wanted to review it again.

5) The final decision about manuscript is made by the Editorial Board on the basis of the analysis of remarks contained in the review and the final version of the paper send by Authors. 6) The final version of the paper, after typesetting and text makeup is being sent to Authors, who make an author’s corrections. Afterwards the paper is ready to be printed in the specific issue.

Reviewers

All Reviewers in 2022

Alonso Rosa (University of the Basque Country/EHU, Bilbao, Spain), Alwaeli Mohamed (Silesian University of Technology), Arora Amarpreet (Sherpa Space Inc., Republic of Korea), Babu A.( Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea), Barbieri Maurizio (Sapienza University of Rome), Bień Jurand (Wydział Infrastruktury i Środowiska, Politechnika Częstochowska), Bogacki Jan (Wydział Instalacji Budowlanych, Hydrotechniki i Inżynierii Środowiska, Politechnika Warszawska), Bogumiła Pawluśkiewicz (Katedra Kształtowania Środowiska, SGGW), Boutammine Hichem (Laboratory of Industrial Process Engineering and Environment, Faculty of Process Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Bab-Ezzouar, Algiers, Algeria), Burszta-Adamiak Ewa (Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu), Cassidy Daniel (Western Michigan University, United States), Chowaniec Józef (Polish Geological Institute - National Research Institute), Czerniawski Robert (Instytut Biologii, Uniwersytet Szczeciński), da Silva Elaine (Fluminense Federal University, UFF, Brazil), Dąbek Lidia (Wydział Inżynierii Środowiska, Geodezji i Energetyki Odnawialnej, Politechnika Świętokrzyska), Dannowski Ralf (Leibniz-Zentrum für Agrarlandschaftsforschung: Müncheberg, Brandenburg, DE), Delgado-González Cristián Raziel (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Tulancingo , Mexico), Dewil Raf (KU Leuven, Belgium), Djemli Samir (University Badji Mokhtar Annaba, Algeria), Du Rui (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China), Egorin AM (Institute of Chemistry FEBRAS, Russia), Fadillah‬ ‪Ganjar‬‬ (Universitas Islam Indonesia, Indonesia), Gangadharan Praveena (Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, India), Garg Manoj (Amity University, Noida, India), Gębicki Jacek (Politechnika Gdańska, Poland), Generowicz Agnieszka (Politechnika Krakowska, Poland), Gnida Anna (Silesian University of Technology, Poland), Golovatyi Sergey (Belarusian State University, Belarus), Grabda Mariusz (General Tadeusz Kosciuszko Military Academy of Land Forces, Poland), Guo Xuetao (Northwest A&F University, China), Gusiatin Mariusz (Uniwersytet Warminsko-Mazurski, Polska), Han Lujia (Instytut Badań Systemowych PAN, Polska), Holnicki Piotr (Systems Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Poland), Houali Karim (University Mouloud MAMMERI, Tizi-Ouzou , Algeria), Iwanek Małgorzata (Lublin University of Technology, Poland), Janczukowicz Wojciech (University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland), Jan-Roblero J. (Instituto Politécnico Nacional,Prol.de Carpio y Plan de Ayala s/n. Col. Sto. Tomás, Mexico), Jarosz-Krzemińska Elżbieta (AGH, Wydział Geologii, Geofizyki i Ochrony Środowiska, Katedra Ochrony Środowiska), Jaspal Dipika (Symbiosis Institute of Technology (SIT), Symbiosis International (Deemed University), (SIU), Jorge Dominguez (Universidade de Vigo, Spain), Kabała Cezary (Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Poland), Kalka Joanna (Silesian University of Technology, Poland), Karaouzas Ioannis (Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Greece), Khadim Hussein (University of Baghdad, Iraq), Khan Moonis Ali (King Saud University, Saudi Arabia), Kojić Ivan (University of Belgrade, Serbia), Kongolo Kitala Pierre (University of Lubumbashi, Congo), Kozłowski Kamil (Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu, Poland), Kucharski Mariusz (IUNG Puławy, Poland), Lu Fan (Tongji University, China), Łukaszewski Zenon (Politechnika Poznańska; Wydział Technologii Chemicznej), Majumdar Pradeep (Addis Ababa Sciennce and Technology University, Ethiopia), Mannheim Viktoria (University of Miskolc, Hungary), Markowska-Szczupak Agata (Zachodniopomorski Uniwersytet Technologiczny w Szczecinie; Wydział Technologii i Inżynierii Chemicznej), Mehmood Andleeb (Shenzhen University, China), Mol Marcos (Fundação Ezequiel Dias, Brazil), Mrowiec Bożena (Akademia Techniczno-Humanistyczna w Bielsku-Białej, Poland), Nałęcz-Jawecki Grzegorz (Zakład Toksykologii i Bromatologii, Wydział Farmaceutyczny, WUM), Ochowiak Marek (Politechnika Poznańska, Poland), Ogbaga Chukwuma (Nile University of Nigeria, Nigeria), Oleniacz Robert (AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Poland), Pan Ligong (Northeast Forestry University, China) Paruch Adam (Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway), Pietras Dariusz (ATH Bielsko-Biała, Poland), Piotrowska-Seget Zofia (Uniwersytet Ślaski, Polska), Płaza Grażyna (IETU Katowice, Poland), Pohl Alina (IPIS PAN Zabrze, Poland), Poikane Sandra (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy), Poluszyńska Joanna (Łukasiewicz Research Network - Institute of Ceramics and Building Materials, Poland), Dudzińska Marzenna (Katedra Jakości Powietrza Wewnętrznego i Zewnętrznego, Politechnika Lubelska), Rawtani Deepak (National Forensic Sciences University, Gandhinagar, India) Rehman Khalil (GC Women University Sialkot, Pakistan), Rogowska Weronika (Bialystok University of Technology, Poland), Rzeszutek Mateusz (AGH, Wydział Geodezji Górniczej i Inżynierii Środowiska, Katedra Kształtowania i Ochrony Środowiska), Saenboonruang Kiadtisak (Faculty of Science, Kasetsart University, Bangkok), Sebakhy Khaled (University of Groningen, Netherlands), Sengupta D.K. (Regional Research Laboratory, Bhubaneswar. India), Shao Jing (Anhui University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chile), Sočo Eleonora (Rzeszów University of Technology, Poland), Sojka Mariusz (Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poland), Sonesten Lars (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden), Song Wencheng (Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Medical Physics and Technology, Chinese), Song ZhongXian (Henan University of Urban Construction, China), Spiak Zofia (Uniwersyet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Poland), Srivastav Arun (Chitkara University, Himachal Pradesh, India), Steliga Teresa (Instytut Nafty i Gazu -Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Poland), Surmacz-Górska Joanna (Silesian University of Technology, Poland), Świątkowski Andrzej (Wojskowa Akademia Techniczna, Poland), Symanowicz Barbara (Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Poland), Szklarek Sebastian (European Regional Centre for Ecohydrology, Polish Academy of Sciences), Tabina Amtul (GC University,Lahore, Pakistan), Tang Lin (Hunan University, China), Torrent Sergi (Innovación, Aigües de Manresa, S.A, Manresa, Spain, Spain), Trafiałek Joanna (Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Poland), Vijay U. (Department of Microb, Jaipur, India, India), Vojtkova Hana (University of Ostrava, Czech Republic), Wang Qi (City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong), Wielgosiński Grzegorz (Wydziału Inżynierii Procesowej i Ochrony Środowiska, Politechnika Łódzka), Wilk Pawel (IMGW-PIB, Poland), Wiśniewska Marta (Warsaw University of Technology, Poland), Yin Xianqiang (Northwest A&F University, Yangling China), Zając Grzegorz (University Of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland), Zalewski Maciej (European Regional Centre for Ecohydrologyunder the auspices of UNESCO, Poland), Zegait Rachid (Ziane Achour University of Djelfa), Zerafat Mohammad (Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran), Zgórska Aleksandra (Central Mining Institute, Poland), Zhang Chunhui (China University of Mining & Technology, China), Zhang Wenbo (Northwest Minzu University, Lanzhou China), Zhu Guocheng (Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, China), Zwierzchowski Ryszard (Zakład Systemów Ciepłowniczych i Gazowniczych, Politechnika Warszawska)

All Reviewers in 2021

Adamkiewicz Łukasz, Aksoy Özlem, Alwaeli Mohamed, Aneta Luczkiewicz, Anielak Anna, Antonkiewicz Jacek, Avino Pasquale, Babbar Deepakshi, Badura Marek, Bajda Tomasz, Biedka Paweł, Błaszczak Barbara, Bodzek Michał, Bogacki Jan, Burszta-Adamiak Ewa, Cheng Gan, Chojecka Agnieszka, Chrzanowski Łukasz, Chwojnowski Andrzej, Ciesielczuk Tomasz, Cimochowicz-Rybicka Małgorzata, Curren Emily, Cydzik-Kwiatkowska Agnieszka, Czajka Agnieszka, Danielewicz Jan, Dannowski Ralf, Daoud Mounir, Değermenci Gökçe, Dejan Dragan, Deluchat Véronique, Demirbaş Ahmet, Dong Shuying, Dudzińska Marzenna, Dunalska Julita, Franus Wojciech, G. Uchrin Christopher, Generowicz Agnieszka, Gębicki Jacek, Giergiczny Zbigniew, Gierszewski Piotr, Glińska-Lewczuk Katarzyna, Godłowska Jolanta, Gokalp Fulya, Gospodarek Janina, Górecki Tadeusz, Grabińska-Sota Elżbieta, Grifoni M., Gromiec Marek, Guo Xuetao, Gusiatin Zygmunt, Hartmann Peter, He Jianzhong, He Yong, Heese Tomasz, Hybská Helena, Imhoff Silvia, Iurchenko Valentina, Jabłońska-Czapla Magdalena, Janowski Mirosław, Jordanov Igor, Jóżwiakowski Krzysztof, Juśkiewicz Włodzimierz, Kabsch-Korbutowicz Małgorzata, Kalinowski Radosław, Kalka Joanna, Kapusta Paweł, Karczewska Anna, Karczmarczyk Agnieszka, Kicińska Alicja, Kiciński Jan, Kijowska-Strugała Małgorzata, Klejnowski Krzysztof, Kłosok-Bazan Iwona, Kolada Agnieszka, Konieczny Krystyna, Kostecki Maciej, Kowalczewska-Madura Katarzyna, Kowalczuk Marek, Kozielska Barbara, Kozłowski Kamil, Krzemień Alicja, Kulig Andrzej, Kwaśny Justyna, Kyzioł-Komosińska Joanna, Ledakowicz Stanislaw, Leites Luchese Claudia, Leszczyńska-Sejda Katarzyna, Li Mingyang, Liu Chao, Mahmood Khalid, Majewska-Nowak Katarzyna, Makisha Nikolay, Malina Grzegorz, Markowska-Szczupak Agata, Mocek Andrzej, Mokrzycki Eugeniusz, Molenda Tadeusz, Molkenthin Frank, Mosquera Corral Anuska, Muhmood Atif, Myrta Anna, Narayanasamy Selvaraju, Nzila Alexis, OIkuski Tadeusz, Oleniacz Robert, Pacyna Jozef, Pająk Tadeusz, Pal Subodh Chandra, Panagopoulos Argyris, Paruch Adam, Paszkowski Waldemar, Pawęska Katarzyna, Paz-Ferreiro Jorge, Paździor Katarzyna, Pempkowiak Janusz, Piątkiewicz Wojciech, Piechowicz Janusz, Piotrowska-Seget Zofia, Pisoni E., Piwowar Arkadiusz, Pleban Dariusz, Policht-Latawiec Agnieszka, Polkowska Żaneta, Poluszyńska Joanna, Rajca Mariola, Reizer Magdalena, Riesgo Fernández Pedro, Rith Monorom, Rybicki Stanisław, Rydzkowski Tomasz, Rzepa Grzegorz, Rzeźnik Wojciech, Rzętała Mariusz, Sabovljevic Marko, Scudiero Rosaria, Sekret Robert, Sheng Yanqing, Sławomir Stelmach, Słowik Leszek, Sočo Eleonora, Sojka Mariusz, Sophonrat Nanta, Sówka Izabela, Spiak Zofia, Stachowski Piotr, Stańczyk-Mazanek Ewa, Stebel Adam, Sulieman Magboul, Surmacz-Górska Joanna, Szalinska van Overdijk Ewa, Szczerbowski Radosław, Szetela Ryszard, Szopińska Kinga, Szymański Kazimierz, Ślipko Katarzyna, Tepe Yalçin, Tórz Agnieszka, Tyagi Uplabdhi, Uliasz-Bocheńczyk Alicja, Urošević Mira, Uzarowicz Łukasz, Vakili Mohammadtaghi, Van Harreveld A.P., Voutchkova Denitza, Wang Gang, Wang X.K., Werbińska-Wojciechowska Sylwia, Wiatkowski Mirosław, Wielgosiński Grzegorz, Wilk Pawel, Willner Joanna, Wisniewski Jacek, Wiśniowska Ewa, Włodarczyk-Makuła Maria, Wojciechowska Ewa, Wojnowska-Baryła Irena, Wolska Małgorzata, Wszołek Tadeusz, Wu Yonghua, Yusuf Mohammad, Zuberi Amina, Zuwała Jarosław, Zwoździak Jerzy.


All Reviewers in 2020

Adamiec Ewa, Adamkiewicz Łukasz, Ahammed M. Mansoor, Akcicek Ekrem, Ameur Houari, Anielak Anna, Antonkiewicz Jacek, Avino Pasquale, Badura Marek, Barabasz Wiesław, Barthakur Manoj, Battegazzore Daniele, Biedka Paweł, Bilek Maciej, Bisschop Lieselot, Błaszczak Barbara, Błażejewski Ryszard, Bochoidze Inga, Bodzek Michał, Bogacki Jan, Borella Paola, Borowiak Klaudia, Borralho Teresa, Boyacioglu Hülya, Bunjongsiri Kultida, Burszta-Adamiak Ewa, Calderon Raul, Chatveera Burachat Chatveera, Cheng Gan, Chiwa Masaaki, Chojnicki Józef, Chrzanowski Łukasz, Ciesielczuk Tomasz, Czajka Agnieszka, Czaplicka Marianna, Daoud Mounir, Dąbek Lidia, Değermenci Gökçe, Dejan Dragan, Deluchat Véronique, Dereszewska Alina, Dębowski Marcin, Dong Shuying, Dudzińska Marzenna, Dunalska Julita, Dymaczewski Zbysław, El-Maradny Amr, Farfan-Cabrera Leonardo, Filizok Işık, Franus Wojciech, García-Ávila Fernando, Gariglio N.F., Gaya M.S, Gebicki Jacek, Giergiczny Zbigniew, Glińska-Lewczuk Katarzyna, Gnida Anna, Gospodarek Janina, Grabińska-Sota Elżbieta, Gusiatin Zygmunt, Harnisz Monika, Hartmann Peter, Hawrot-Paw Małgorzata, He Jianzhong, Hirabayashi Satoshi, Hulisz Piotr, Imhoff Silvia, Iurchenko Valentina, Jabłońska-Czapla Magdalena, Jacukowicz-Sobala Irena, Jeż-Walkowiak Joanna, Jordanov Igor, Jóżwiakowski Krzysztof, Kabsch-Korbutowicz Małgorzata, Kajda-Szcześniak Małgorzata, Kalinowski Radosław, Kalka Joanna, Karczewska Anna, Karwowska Ewa, Kim Ki-Hyun, Klejnowski Krzysztof, Klojzy-Karczmarczyk Beata, Korniłłowicz-Kowalska Teresa, Korus Irena, Kostecki Maciej, Koszelnik Piotr, Koter Stanisław, Kowalska Beata, Kowalski Zygmunt, Kozielska Barbara, Krzyżyńska Renata, Kulig Andrzej, Kwarciak-Kozłowska Anna, Kyzioł-Komosińska Joanna, Lagzdins Ainis, Ledakowicz Stanislaw, Ligęza Sławomir, Liu Xingpo, Loga Małgorzata, Łebkowska Maria, Macherzyński Mariusz, Makisha Nikolay, Makowska Małgorzata, Masłoń Adam, Mazur Zbigniew, Michel Monika, Miechówka Anna, Miksch Korneliusz, Mnuchin Nathan, Mokrzycki Eugeniusz, Molkenthin Frank, Mosquera Corral Anuska, Muhmood Atif, Muntean Edward, Myrta Anna, Nahorski Zbigniew, Narayanasamy Selvaraju, Naumczyk Jeremi, Nawalany Marek, Noubactep C., Nowakowski Piotr, Obarska-Pempkowiak Hanna, Orge C.A., Paul Lothar, Pawęska Katarzyna, Paździor Katarzyna, Pempkowiak Janusz, Peña A., Pietr Stanisław, Piotrowska-Seget Zofia, Pisoni E., Płaza Grażyna, Polkowska Żaneta, Reizer Magdalena, Renman Gunno, Rith Monorom, Romanovski Valentin, Rybicki Stanisław, Rydzkowski Tomasz, Rzętała Mariusz, Sadeghi Mahdi, Sakakibara Yutaka, Scudiero Rosaria, Semaan Mary, Seredyński Franciszek, Sergienko Ruslan, Shen Yujun, Sheng Yanqing, Sidełko Robert, Sočo Eleonora, Sojka Mariusz, Sówka Izabela, Spiak Zofia, Stegenta-Dąbrowska Sylwia, Steliga Teresa, Sulieman Magboul, Surmacz-Górska Joanna, Suryadevara Nagaraja, Suska-Malawska Małgorzata, Szalinska van Overdijk Ewa, Szczerbowski Radosław, Szetela Ryszard, Szpyrka Ewa, Szulczyński Bartosz, Szwast Maciej, Szyszlak-Bargłowicz Joanna, Ślipko Katarzyna, Świetlik Ryszard, Tabernacka Agnieszka, Tepe Yalçin, Tobiszewski Marek, Treichel Wiktor, Tyagi Uplabdhi, Uliasz-Bocheńczyk Alicja, Uzarowicz Łukasz, Van Harreveld A.P., Wang X. K., Wasielewski Ryszard, Wiatkowski Mirosław, Wielgosiński Grzegorz, Willner Joanna, Wisniewski Jacek, Witczak Joanna, Witkiewicz Zygfryd, Włodarczyk Małgorzata, Włodarczyk-Makuła Maria, Wojciechowska Ewa, Wojtkowska Małgorzata, Xinhui Duan, Yang Chunping, Yaqian Zhao Yaqian, Załęska-Radziwiłł Monika, Zamorska Justyna, Zasina Damian, Zawadzki Jarosław, Zdeb Monika M., Zheng Guodi, Zhu Ivan X., Ziułkiewicz Maciej, Zuberi Amina, Zwoździak Jerzy, Żabczyński Sebastian, Żukowski Witold, Żygadło Maria.




Plagiarism Policy

Anti-plagiarism policy

In accordance with AEP requirements, the authors of all articles submitted to the Editorial Office declare that the paper is an original work. Articles that have been approved by the Editorial Board for further processing are checked for originality using the program and iThenticate. As plagiarism, the Editorial Board (according to the definition of plagiarism/anti-plagiarism) recognizes:

• claiming someone else's work or parts of it as your own;
• copying someone else's or your own (self-plagiarism) fragments of articles without reference to the publication (title of the work, names of authors) from which it was taken
• inserting fragments of other works into the article, changing only the order of the sentence or introducing only minor changes to it
• an article in which the copied fragments, despite citing their sources, constitute a significant/major part of the article.

In case of plagiarism/self-plagiarism, further work on this article is stopped and it is removed from the Editorial System. The authors of the article (via the corresponding author) submitted to the Editorial Office of the AEP are informed about the reasons for removing the article.

This page uses 'cookies'. Learn more